Published date: Dec 07 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference on Environmental, Social and Governance (ICESG 2022)

Pages: 222–238

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i20.14605

John Tin Yuan Enjohn@icats.edu.myFaculty of Engineering and Technology, i-CATS University College

Wan Azlan Zainal AbidinFaculty of Engineering and Technology, i-CATS University College

Thermal comfort is a subjective response that reflects the contentment between one’s state of mind and the current environment. The energy consumption of the building sector has rapidly increased due to improved living standards and rising expectations of residents regarding thermal comfort. Mechanical ventilation, especially air conditioning systems, is essential for hot and humid countries aiming to achieve an ideal indoor comfort condition. However, such cooling systems often consume a significant amount of electricity, which contradicts the concept of energy conservation. Therefore, thermal comfort assessment is a method that can be employed to address this issue. Evaluating the thermal perception of occupants can subsequently facilitate more efficient electricity usage, aligning with the goal of energy conservation. In this study, a thermal comfort analysis was conducted on free-running residential buildings in Sarawak. These buildings were naturally ventilated with minimal use of mechanical ventilation systems. Physical measurements and subjective assessments were employed to evaluate the thermal responses of the residents based on various sensation and comfort scales, including the ASHRAE scale, Bedford scale, thermal acceptability scale, and thermal preference scale. Additionally, the widely used PMV model was utilized to predict the thermal sensation experienced by the residents. The results of the study indicated that the Bedford scale exhibited the highest percentage of acceptable responses, followed by the ASHRAE scale, thermal acceptability scale, and thermal preference scale. The PMV model was observed to overpredict the residents’ thermal responses. The comfort temperatures derived from the study were 27.5 ∘C, 28.1 ∘C, and 26.2 ∘C according to the ASHRAE scale, Bedford scale, and PMV model, respectively. Based on the actual percentage of dissatisfaction that ensures 80% satisfaction, the acceptable indoor temperature range was found to be 27.3 ∘C to 29.6 ∘C. Similarly, the acceptable range for relative humidity was 74.0% to 92.0%, and for air velocity, it was 0.18 m/s to 0.66 m/s.

Keywords: thermal comfort, thermal perception, sensation, comfort scales

[1] Chen R, Tsay YS. Carbon emission and thermal comfort prediction model for an office building considering the contribution rate of design parameters. Energy Rep. 2022;8:8093–107.

[2] Chai J, Fan J. Advanced thermal regulating materials and system for energy saving and thermal comfort in buildings. Mater Today Energy. 2022;24:100925.

[3] Aqilah N, Zaki SA, Hagishima A, Rijal HB, Yakub F. Analysis on electricity use and indoor thermal environment for typical air-conditioning residential buildings in Malaysia. Urban Clim. 2021;37:100830.

[4] Chan HY, Riffat SB, Zhu J. Review of passive solar heating and cooling technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(2):781–9.

[5] Duan Z, Zhan C, Zhang X, Mustafa M, Zhao X, Alimohammadisagvand B, et al. Indirect evaporative cooling: Past, present and future potentials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(9):6823–50.

[6] Luis PL, Jose O, Christine P. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy Build. 2008;40(3):394–8.

[7] Hughes BR, Chaudhry HN, Ghani SA. A review of sustainable cooling technologies in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(6):3112–20.

[8] Asif M, Muneer T, Kelley R. Life cycle assessment: a case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Build Environ. 2007;42(3):1391–4.

[9] Kubota T, Jeong S, Toe DH, Ossen DR. Energy consumption and air-conditioning usage in residential buildings of Malaysia. Journal of International Development and Cooperation. 2011;17(3):61–9.

[10] Zr DL, Mochtar S. Application of bioclimatic parameter as sustainability approach on multi-story building design in tropical area. Procedia Environ Sci. 2013;17:822–30.

[11] Q. J. Kwong, N. M. Adam and B. B. Sahari, (2014). Thermal comfort assessment and potential for energy efficiency enhancement in moderntropical buildings: A review. Energy and Buildings, 68(Part A), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.034.

[12] United Nation Development Programme (UNDP). Achieving Industrial Energy Efficiency in Malaysia. Malaysia: United Nation Development Programme; 2006.

[13] Oh TH, Hasanuzzaman M, Selvaraj J, Teo SC, Chua SC. Energy policy and alternative energy in Malaysia: issues and challenges for sustainable growth – An update. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;81:3021–31.

[14] Hepbasli A. Low exergy (LowEx) heating and cooling systems for sustainable buildings and societies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(1):73–104.

[15] Saidur R, Masjuki HH, Jamaluddin MY. An application of energy and exergy analysis in residential sector of Malaysia. Energy Policy. 2007;35(2):1050–63.

[16] Balta MT, Dincer I, Hepbasli A. Development of sustainable energy options for buildings in a sustainable society. Sustain Cities Soc. 2011;1(2):72–80.

[17] Culic A, Nizetic S, Solic P, Perkovic T, Andelkovic A, Congradac V. Investigation of personal thermal comfort in office building by implementation of smart bracelet: A case study. Energy. 2022;260:124973.

[18] Nicol F, Stevenson F. Adaptive comfort in an unpredictable world. Build Res Inform. 2013;41(3):255–8.

[19] Nicol F, Humphreys M, Roaf S. Adaptive thermal comfort: principles and practice. Routledge; 2012. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123010.

[20] Xue F, Zhao J. Building thermal comfort research based on energy-saving concept. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2021;2021:7132437.

[21] Gilani SI, Khan MH, Pao W. Thermal comfort analysis of PMV model prediction in air conditioned and naturally ventilated buildings. Energy Procedia. 2015;75:1373–9.

[22] deDear R, Brager G, Cooper D. (1997). Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. In: Final Report—ASHRAE Project RP 884.

[23] Nico F, Roaf S. Pioneering new indoor temperature standard: the Pakistan project. Energy Build. 1996;23(3):169–74.

[24] Wong NH, Khoo SS. Thermal comfort in classrooms in the tropics. Energy Build. 2003;35(4):337–51.

[25] Brager G, deDear R. Thermal adaptation in the built environment: literature review. Energy Build. 1998;27(1):83–96.

[26] Djongyang N, Tchinda R, Njomo D. Thermal comfort: A review paper. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14(9):2626–40

[27] Lin Z, Deng S. A study on the thermal comfort in sleeping environments in the subtropics- developing a thermal comfort model for sleeping environments. Build Environ. 2008;43(1):70–81.

[28] Yao R, Liu J, Li B. Occupants’ adaptive responses and perception of thermal environment in naturally conditioned university classrooms. Appl Energy. 2010;87(3):1015– 22.

[29] Jose AO. A review of general and local thermal comfort models for controlling indoor ambiences. Ashok Kumar. Air Quality. Spain: University of Coruna, Department of Energy and M. P; 2010. https://doi.org/10.5772/9763.

[30] Orosa JA. Research on general thermal comfort models. Eur J Sci Res. 2009;27(2):217–27.

[31] Malaysian Standard. MS 1525:2007, (2007). Code of Practise on Energy Efficiency and Use of Renewable Energy for Non-residential Buildings. Cyberjaya Selangor, Department of Standards Malaysia.

[32] Abdeen MO. Renewable building energy systems and passive human comfort solutions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008;12(6):1562–87.

[33] Yao R, Li B, Jing L. A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort – Adaptive Predicted Mean Vote (aPMV). Build Environ. 2009;44(10):2089–96.

[34] Feriadi H, Wong NH. Thermal comfort for naturally ventilated houses in Indonesia. Energy Build. 2004;36(7):614–26.

[35] Kilic M, Kaynakli O, Yamankaradeniz R. Determination of required core temperature for thermal comfort with steady-state energy balance method. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2006;33(2):199–210.

[36] Candido C, deDear R, Lamberts R. Combined thermal acceptability and air movement assessments in a hot humid climate. Build Environ. 2011;46(2):379–85.

[37] Nguyen AT, Singh MK, Reiter S. An adaptive thermal comfort model for hot humid South-East Asia. Build Environ. 2012;56:291–300.

[38] Ren Z, Chen D. Modelling study of the impact of thermal comfort criteria on housing energy use in Australia. Appl Energy. 2018;210:152–66.

[39] Yun GY. Influences of perceived control on thermal comfort and energy use in buildings. Energy Build. 2018;158:822–30.

[40] deDear RJ, Brager GS. Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy Build. 2002;34(6):549–61.

[41] Kim J, deDear R. Thermal comfort expectations and adaptive behavioural characteristics of primary and secondary school students. Build Environ. 2018;127:13–22.

[42] Wijewardane S, Jayasinghe MT. Thermal comfort temperature range for factory workers in warm humid tropical climates. Renew Energy. 2008;33(9):2057–63.

[43] Feriadi H, Wong NH. Thermal comfort for naturally ventilated houses in Indonesia. Energy Build. 2004;36(7):614–26.

[44] Azizpour F, Moghimi S, Salleh E, Mat S, Lim CH, Sopian K. Thermal comfort assessment of large-scale hospitals in tropical climates: A case study of University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC). Energy Build. 2013;64:317–22.

[45] ASHRAE. Thermal Comfort Tool CD (ASHRAE Item Code 94030). American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers; 1995.

[46] ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2020. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers. 2021.

[47] ASHRAE. Fundamentals Handbook: Thermal Comfort. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers; 2009.

[48] Chew BT, Kazi SN, Amiri A. Adaptive thermal comfort model for air-conditioned lecture halls in Malaysia. International Journal of Civil, Structural. Construction and Architectural Engineering. 2015;9(2):146–53.