KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Word Analysis Regarding the Terminology of Addiction in Adolescents

Published date: Oct 30 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 5th Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (5th SoRes)

Pages: 513–519

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i18.14253

Authors:

Andhita Nurul KhasanahEmail: andhitanurul@yahoo.com
Affiliation: Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Bandung
Biography:

Indri Utami SumaryantiEmail: N/A
Affiliation: Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Bandung
Biography:

Fira ZidantiEmail: N/A
Affiliation: Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Bandung
Biography:

Salwa AzzahraEmail: N/A
Affiliation: Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Bandung
Biography:

Maureen Ratna UtamiEmail: N/A
Affiliation: Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Islam Bandung
Biography:

Andhita Nurul Khasanah - andhitanurul@yahoo.com - https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3677-8119

Indri Utami Sumaryanti

Fira Zidanti

Salwa Azzahra

Maureen Ratna Utami

Abstract:

The World Drug Report 2018, published by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), states that as many as 275 million people in the world, or 5.6% of the world’s population aged 15 to 64 years, have used drugs. Based on the data obtained and the latest research, the age group most prone to drug exposure and abuse are those between 15 and 35 years old, commonly known as the millennial generation. If adolescents are a group that is susceptible to substance abuse, then promotive interventions must be provided at this age to prevent usage that often results in addiction. Meanwhile, social phenomena related to the public understanding of drug abuse or addictive behavior have changed. These changes are caused by various factors and have resulted in evolving definitions in today’s society, including among adolescents. Adolescents, as a group of people who have the developmental task of building relationships with peers, tend to accept or reject groups that are considered different, which can lead to stigmatization among teenagers. Understanding how teenagers view NAPZA/NARKOBA/substance abuse is important. The data obtained from this study consisted of 27 words, which were analyzed as emergent themes and two pairs of equivalences, serving as experimental material through a neurofeedback approach.

Keywords: addiction, substance abuse, stigma, neurofeedback

References:

[1] Khasanah AN, Damayanti T, Sirodj DA. Gambaran negative automatic thoughts pada remaja korban bullying di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Kota Bandung. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi. 2017;4(2):239–250.

[2] Samenow, “Does the word ‘addiction’ have any meaning?” 2019. https://www.psychologytoday.com/ (accessed May 31, 2023).

[3] Parekh R. What is addiction. American Psychiatric Association; 2017.

[4] D. American Psychiatric Association and A. P. Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American psychiatric association Washington, DC, 2013;5(5).

[5] Hartney E. DSM 5 criteria for substance use disorders. Volume 21. Updated on March; 2020.

[6] Hasin DS, O’Brien CP, Auriacombe M, Borges G, Bucholz K, Budney A, et al. DSM- 5 criteria for substance use disorders: Recommendations and rationale. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;170(8):834–851.

[7] Ardhiyanti Y, Lusiana N, Megasari K. Bahan ajar AIDS pada asuhan kebidanan. Deepublish; 2015.

[8] Badan Narkotika Nasional. “Stigma Pecandu Harus Dirubah,” 2013. https://bnn.go.id/ (accessed May 31, 2023).

[9] Anggarwati S, Nawangsih E. “Pengaruh Pelayanan Komprehensif Terhadap Quality Of Life pada Pengguna Napza di LSM Rehabilitasi Rumah Cemara Bandung Berdasarkan Whoqol-Bref,” 2019.

[10] Kulesza M, Ramsey S, Brown R, Larimer M. Stigma among individuals with substance use disorders: does it predict substance use, and does it diminish with treatment? Journal of Addictive Behaviors,Therapy & Rehabilitation. 2014 Jan;3(1):1000115.

[11] Ashford RD, Brown AM, Curtis B. Substance use, recovery, and linguistics: The impact of word choice on explicit and implicit bias. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2018 Aug;189:131–138.

[12] Ashford RD, Brown AM, Curtis B. The language of substance use and recovery: Novel use of the go/no–go association task to measure implicit bias. Health Communication. 2019 Oct;34(11):1296–1302.

[13] Link BG, Phelan JC. “Labeling and stigma,” Handbook of the sociology of mental health. 2013:525-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_25

[14] Link BG, Phelan J. Stigma power. Social Science & Medicine. 2014 Feb;103:24–32.

[15] Blakemore SJ, Mills KL. Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology. 2014;65(1):187–207.

[16] Livingston JD, Milne T, Fang ML, Amari E. The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: A systematic review. Addiction. 2012 Jan;107(1):39–50.

[17] Elmore KC, Scull TM, Kupersmidt JB. Media as a ‘super peer’: How adolescents interpret media messages predicts their perception of alcohol and tobacco use norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2017 Feb;46(2):376–387.

[18] Kelly JF, Saitz R, Wakeman S. Language, substance use disorders, and policy: The need to reach consensus on an ‘addiction-ary,’. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly. 2016;34(1):116–123.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

150 Abstract Views

123 PDF Downloads