Published date: Oct 30 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 5th Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (5th SoRes)

Pages: 256–265

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i18.14224

Dian Alan Setiawandian.alan@unisba.ac.idUniversitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Abdul Rohman .Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Fabian Fadhly JambakUniversitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Alfiyan UmbaraUniversitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

Fitrah Wildan SUniversitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

The economic interest that dominates the pattern of modern human life causes the most prominent global transformation in terms of economic activity. Related to this, a macro approach is needed in overcoming technology-based economic crimes. The urgency of this research is expected to provide input for the development of legal science, specifically in Judicial Law and Economic Criminal Law related to cybercrime and make improvements in the provisions of laws and regulations relating to telematics crimes, especially in terms of electronic transactions. This study uses normative legal research. This study uses secondary data and primary data as supporting data. The results of this study show that overcoming technological economic crimes requires a multi-aspect concept because the nature of technological economic crimes is very complex. Its complexity continues to grow following the flow of global transformation in the economy. Therefore, the concept of handling it must be done with a multi-aspect concept.

Keywords: economic, crimes, technology, global

[1] Kagan RA. Globalization and legal change: The ‘Americanization’ of European law? Regul Gov. 2007;1(2):99–120.

[2] Aguilar-Millan S, Foltz JE, Jackson J, Oberg A. “The globalization of crime. USA: The Futurist; 2008. pp. 41–50.

[3] Al W. Telematics crime prevention strategy. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Atma Jaya University Yogyakarta; 2010.

[4] Atmasasmita R. Introduction to Business Crime Law. 1st ed. Bogor: Kencana; 2003.

[5] Marzuki PM. Penelitian Hukum, Cet.6. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.

[6] LD, et al. Simon, Demokrasi dan Internet : Kawan Atau Lawan? (Democracy and The Internet: Allies or Adversaries, Alih Bahasa: Tri Wibowo BS. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2003.

[7] Al Wisnusubroto, “Criminality in E- commerce: Challenges of Operationalization of Criminal Law and Prospects of Its Regulation in Pro Justitia,” Jakarta, Apr. 2001.

[8] Endeshaw A. Hukum E-commerce dan Internet dengan Fokus di Asia Pasifik (Internet and E-commerce Law: With a Focus on Asia Pacific. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2007.

[9] Fakih M. Runtuhnya Teori Pembangunan dan Globalisasi. Yogyakarta: Insist Press dan Pustaka Pelajar, 2003.

[10] Khor M. Globalisasi Perangkap Negara-Negara Selatan (Globalization and the South : Some Critical Issues). Yogyakarta: Cinderelas Pustaka Rakyat Cerdas; 2001.

[11] Barda Nawawi Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.

[12] Trisa U. “Kebijakan Anstisipatif Hukum Pidana Untuk Penanggulangan Cyberterrorism,” Masalah-Masalah Hukum. Volume 43. FH Undip; 2014. pp. 1–10. [Online], Available https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/158219-ID-none.pdf

[13] Bunga D. Politik Hukum Pidana Terhadap Penanggulangan Cybercrime. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. 2019 Mar;16(1): https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v16i1.456.