Published date: Oct 02 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 1st Doctoral International Conference 2023

Pages: 874–882

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i17.14185

Ruslimin .rusliminmimin73@gmail.comDoctoral Program of Public administration, Faculty of social a nd political Sciences, Hasanuddin University

Mohamad Thahir HaningDoctoral Program of Public administration, Faculty of social a nd political Sciences, Hasanuddin University

Badu AchmadDoctoral Program of Public administration, Faculty of social a nd political Sciences, Hasanuddin University

Gita SusantiDoctoral Program of Public administration, Faculty of social a nd political Sciences, Hasanuddin University

The village holds a significant role in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, but its implementation often faces obstacles. One of the main challenges is the formulation of policies, which may involve assumptions, generalizations, and simplifications that do not align with the practical realities during implementation. Consequently, there is a gap between what is formulated and what is effectively implemented. This study employs a literature review with a qualitative approach, specifically a systemic review. The metaaggressive approach is utilized to synthesize results from various research sources to provide solutions to the research questions. Based on the study’s findings, it is concluded that village fund management in Wajo District has not been effective. In this context, it is recommended to employ Grindle’s theory as an analytical tool to address the issues encountered in managing village funds. Grindle’s theory comprehensively explains that two variables influence the success of policy implementation: policy content and implementation content.

Keywords: policy, policy implementation, village fund

[1] Budiyono, Statistics for Research. Surakarta: UNS Press; 2013.

[2] Hanif N. Growth and Administration of Village Government. Jakarta: Erlangga; 2011.

[3] Nugroho R. Public Policy 7: Dinamika Kebijakan Publik, Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Manajemen Politik Kebijakan Publik, Etika Kebijakan Publik, PT Elex Media Komputindo, 2023.

[4] Easton D. The political system. World Polit. 1957;9(3):383–400.

[5] Wibowo S. Public Policy Evaluation. Jakarta: Raja Gravindo Persada; 1994.

[6] Van Meter D, Van Horn C. Policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society. 1975;6(4):445–488.

[7] Elmore RF. Complexity and control: What legislators and administrators can do about implementating public policy. 1980.

[8] Mazmanian D, Sabatier P. Effective policy implementation. Lexington: Heath and Co.; 1981.

[9] Grindle MS. Political and policy implementation in the third world. New Jersey: Prince University Press; 1980. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400886081

[10] Salusu J. Strategic decision making for public organizations and non-profit organizations. Jakarta: Grasindo; 2003.

[11] Perry A, Hammond N. Systematic Review: The Experience of a PhD Student. Psychology Learning & Teaching. 2002;2(1):32–35.

[12] C. Francis and Baldesari, Systematic review of qualitative literature. Oxford: UK Cochrane Center; 2006.

[13] Lewin S. Methods for synthesis of qualitative evidence alongside cochrane intervention review. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2008.