Published date: Oct 02 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 1st Doctoral International Conference 2023

Pages: 132–142

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i17.14110

Andi Zulkiflyandizulkifly@gmail.comDoctoral Student of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University

Collaborative governance encourages cooperation and active participation among various parties. This study aims to analyze collaborative governance in investment programs in the city of Makassar. It uses a qualitative descriptive research method. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies. The research participants were actors involved in the investment program. Data sources included primary data obtained from observations and in-depth interviews, while secondary data were obtained from document searches. The results show that the collaborative governance process in the investment program in Makassar City is going well, as can be seen from the routine face-to-face dialogue as well as the trust that is built through the provision of information and evaluating services. Joint commitment is achieved by carrying out duties and functions. However, there are still apparatus human resources that have not participated in investment management training, which hinders the optimal implementation of the program. Meanwhile, shared understanding has been built through joint deliberations as a form of constraint discussion. The results of the investment program can be seen in the annual increase in domestic and foreign investment.

Keywords: collaborative governance, investment program, capital investment

[1] Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18(4):543–71.

[2] Alexander JC, Comfort ME, Weiner BJ. Governance in public private community health partnerships: A survey of community care network SM demonstration sites. Nonprofit Management Leadership. 1998;8(4):311–32.

[3] Beierle TC, Konisky DM. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2001;19(4):515–27.

[4] Glasbergen P, Driessen PPJ. Interactive planning of infrastructure: The changing role of Dutch project management. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2005;23(2):263–277.

[5] Imprial M. Using collaboration as a governance strategy. Administration & Society. 2005;37(3):281–320.

[6] BWC, K Murdock. Stakeholder participation in voluntary environmental agreements: Analysis of ten projects XL case studies. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2005;30(2):223–50.

[7] Short C, Winter M. “The problem of common land: Towards stakeholder governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 1999;42(5):613–30.

[8] Tell LC. Collaborative partnerships in community education. Journal of Education Policy. 2003;18(1):37–51.

[9] S & H Vangen. Enacting leadership for collaborative advantage: Dilemmas of ideology and pragmatism in partnership managers. Activities British Journal of Journal of Management. 2003;14(1):561–576.

[10] H. A. e. a. Miles MB. Qualitative data analysis: A method source book. California: SAGE Publications. 2014.