KnE Social Sciences
ISSN: 2518-668X
The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.
IMPROVING COMPANY PERFORMANCE IN RURAL AREAS: INSTITUTIONAL THEORY APPROACH
Published date: Jul 24 2023
Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences
Issue title: Third Economic, Law, Education and Humanities International Conference (3rd ELEHIC)
Pages: 129–145
Authors:
Abstract:
Development in rural areas has become the focus of governments in many countries. This study aims to analyze the effect of institutional pressure and strategic orientation on financial performance. This study also examines social performance as a mediating variable. The research was conducted at village institutions, namely Village-Owned Enterprises in four regions in Riau Province, Indonesia. A total of 239 Village-Owned Enterprises were studied with 526 respondents, namely VOE managers. Questionnaires were distributed directly and via the internet. Questionnaires were sent via WhatsApp to the VOE manager. Structural analysis of the equation model with Warp PLs shows that all hypotheses are supported. Institutional pressure and strategic orientation affect financial performance, and social performance is a mediator variable
Keywords: institutional pressure, strategic orientation, social performance, financial performance
References:
[1] Long X, Yu H, Sun M, Wang X-C, Klemeš JJ, Xie W, et al. Sustainability evaluation based on the Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index: A case study on the four island regions in China. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2020;265:110509. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479720304436
[2] Pugh R, Dubois A. Peripheries within economic geography: Four “problems” and the road ahead of us. J Rural Stud [Internet]. 2021;87:267–75. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016721002710
[3] Phillipson J, Tiwasing P, Gorton M, Maioli S, Newbery R, Turner R. Shining a spotlight on small rural businesses: How does their performance compare with urban? J Rural Stud. 2019;(68):230–9.
[4] McElwee G, Smith R, Somerville P. Conceptualising animation in rural communities: the Village SOS case. Entrep Reg Dev. 2018;30(1–2):173–98.
[5] Kania I, Anggadwita G, Alamanda DT. A new approach to stimulate rural entrepreneurship through village-owned enterprises in Indonesia. J Enterprising Communities. 2021;15(3):432–50.
[6] Kotawaringinbaratkab.go.id. Waktunya Maksimalkan Potensi Desa Melalui BUMDes [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://mmc.kotawaringinbaratkab.go.id/berita/waktunya-maksimalkan-potensidesa- melalui-bumdes
[7] Kerlin JA, Lall SA, Peng S, Cui TS. Institutional intermediaries as legitimizing agents for social enterprise in China and India. Public Manag Rev. 2021;23(5):731–53.
[8] Eiadat Y, Kelly A, Roche F, Eyadat H. Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. J World Bus [Internet]. 2008;43(2):131–45. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951607000892
[9] Kalyar MN, Shoukat A, Shafique I. Enhancing firms’ environmental performance and financial performance through green supply chain management practices and institutional pressures. Sustain Accounting, Manag Policy J. 2020;11(2):451–76.
[10] Huang Y-C, Huang C-H. Exploring institutional pressure, the top management team’s response, green innovation adoption, and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan’s electrical and electronics industry. Eur J Innov Manag [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1;aheadof- p(ahead-of-print). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0126
[11] Rizan M, Balfas F, Purwohedi U. The influence of strategic orientation, organizational innovation capabilities and strategic planning on the performance of technologybased firms. Acad Strateg Manag J. 2019;18(3).
[12] Obeidat BY. The Effect of Strategic Orientation on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovation. Int J Commun Netw Syst Sci. 2016;09(11):478–505.
[13] Nzewi H, Ebele M, Jesuwunmi A, Daniel C, Stanley A. Corporate Strategic Planning and Nigerian Deposit Money Banks’ Financial Performance. J Econ Manag Trade. 2017;19(1):1–17.
[14] Bhattarai C, Bhandari M. ’Trade vs. Grant Dependency’and Social Enterprise Performance: a Mediating Role of Learning Orientation. 2021;44(0):1–12. Available from: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/30608{%}0Ahttp://repository. essex.ac.uk/30608/4/ICSB2021WC-TDvsGD-accepted.pdf
[15] DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev. 1983;17(2):143–66.
[16] Bhattarai CR, Kwong CCY, Tasavori M. Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2019;96:47–60. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829631830523X
[17] Scott W. Institutions and Organizations. USA: Sage: Thousand Oaks; 1995.
[18] Muhammad Auwal A, Mohamed Z, Nasir Shamsudin M, Sharifuddin J, Ali F. External pressure influence on entrepreneurship performance of SMEs: a case study of Malaysian herbal industry. J Small Bus Entrep [Internet]. 2020 Mar 3;32(2):149–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1509504
[19] Dagiliene L, Frendzel M, Sutiene K, Wnuk-Pel T. Wise managers think about circular economy, wiser report and analyze it. Research of environmental reporting practices in EU manufacturing companies. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2020;274:121968. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620320151
[20] Pramesti KS, Prayudi MA, Wahyuni MA. Teori Institusional dan Kualitas Penyusunan Indikator Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Studi Pada Pemerintahan Daerah Kabupaten Klungkung). J Akunt Univ Pendidik Ganesha. 2017;8(2):1–12.
[21] Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Urbieta L, Boiral O. Organizations’ engagement with sustainable development goals: From cherry-picking to SDG-washing? Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag [Internet]. 2022 Mar 1;29(2):316–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2202
[22] Lu Y, Zhao C, Xu L, Shen L. Dual institutional pressures, sustainable supply chain practice and performance outcome. Sustain. 2018;10(9):1–25.
[23] Yue X, Huo B, Ye Y. The impact of coercive pressure and ethical responsibility on cross-functional green management and firm performance. J Bus Ind Mark [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1;ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM- 09-2021-0446
[24] Huo B, Han Z, Zhao X, Zhou H, Wood CH, Zhai X. The impact of institutional pressures on supplier integration and financial performance: Evidence from China. Int J Prod Econ [Internet]. 2013;146(1):82–94. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527313000315
[25] Morgan RE, Strong CA. Business performance and dimensions of strategic orientation. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2003;56(3):163–76. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296301002181
[26] Chadwick C, Flinchbaugh C. Searching for Competitive Advantage in the HRM-Firm Performance Relationship. Acad Manag Perspect [Internet]. 2020 Feb 5;35(2):181– 207. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0065
[27] Gatignon H, Xuereb J-M. Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance. J Mark Res
[Internet]. 1997 Oct 15;34(1):77–90. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3152066
[28] Han JK, Kim N, Srivastava RK. Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? J Mark [Internet]. 1998 Oct 1;62(4):30–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200403
[29] Mani V, Gunasekaran A. Four forces of supply chain social sustainability adoption in emerging economies. Int J Prod Econ [Internet]. 2018;199:150–61. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552731830104X
[30] Chardine-Baumann E, Botta-Genoulaz V. A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Comput Ind Eng. 2014;76(1):138– 47.
[31] Dai J, Jia Q, Xie L, Wang J. Research of Performance Evaluation on Sustainable Supply Chain Based on Structural Equation Modeling. Ecol Econ. 2015;31:86–9.
[32] Reefke H, Sundaram D. Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management – identification and evaluation. Omega [Internet]. 2017;66:195–211. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0305048316000347
[33] Laari S, Toyli J, Solakivi T, Ojala L. Firm performance and customer-driven green supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 2016;112(3):1960–70.
[34] Laforet S. Effects of size, market and strategic orientation on innovation in nonhightech manufacturing SMEs. Eur J Mark [Internet]. 2009 Jan 1;43(1/2):188– 212. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910923292
[35] Adams P, Bodas Freitas IM, Fontana R. Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2019;97:129–40. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318306891
[36] Wang W, Liu X, Li H. Optimisation Of Marketing Management By Looking At Strategic Orientation, Technology Orientation And Innovation Performance. Accounting, Organ Econ. 2022;01(03):252–78.
[37] Yeh T-M, Chen S-H, Chen T-F. The Relationships among Experiential Marketing, Service Innovation, and Customer Satisfaction—A Case Study of Tourism Factories in Taiwan. Sustainability [Internet]. 2019;11(4). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1041
[38] Subramanian N, Gunasekaran A. Cleaner supply-chain management practices for twenty-first-century organizational competitiveness: Practice-performance framework and research propositions. Int J Prod Econ. 2015;164.
[39] Hermanto H. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Budaya Organisasi, Dan Orientasi Strategis Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi Melalui Peran Mediasi Knowledge Management (Studi Pada PDAM Di Nusa Tenggara Barat). INOBIS J Inov Bisnis dan Manaj Indones. 2018;1(3):343–56.
[40] Sholihin M, Ratmono D. Analisis SEM-PLS dengan Warp PLS 3.0. Andi Offset Yogyakarta; 2013.
[41] Hair JF, Black WC, Babin JB, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. Amazon; 2010.
[42] Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.
[43] Saeed A, Jun Y, Nubuor SA, Priyankara HPR, Jayasuriya MPF. Institutional Pressures, Green Supply Chain Management Practices on Environmental and Economic Performance: A Two Theory View. Sustainability [Internet]. 2018;10(5). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/5/1517
[44] Huang Y-C, Chen CT. Exploring institutional pressures, firm green slack, green product innovation and green new product success: Evidence from Taiwan’s hightech industries. Technol Forecast Soc Change [Internet]. 2022;174:121196. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521006296
[45] Grawe SJ, Chen H, Daugherty PJ. The relationship between strategic orientation, service innovation, and performance. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag [Internet]. 2009 Jan 1;39(4):282–300. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030910962249