Published date: Jun 21 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 4th International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science (ICoGPASS)

Pages: 494–502

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i11.13568

Augustin Rina Herawatiaugustinrina@lecturer.undip.ac.idUniversitas Diponegoro

Nina WidowatiUniversitas Diponegoro

Maesaroh .Universitas Diponegoro

The court is one of the government agencies that has the task of providing public services to the community in the field of law and justice. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia oversees all four legal systems in Indonesia: regular courts, religious courts, military courts, and state administrative courts. The Supreme Court consistently implements numerous policies referencing the Blueprint for Judicial Renewal 2010–2035 in an effort to improve court services. A policy that greatly impacts the change in the quality of court services to be more informative, transparent, and accountable is the start of the implementation of the Case Investigation Information System (SIPP). The SIPP program is the first step in the transition of conventional judicial services to the digital age. The policy of digitization in the judiciary has gradually developed until the implementation of e-court and e-litigation as the main forum for the realization of electronic justice in Indonesia. This paper aims to look at the development of court services from time to time, which is analyzed descriptively to examine the application of existing judicial service policies up to the current era of globalization 4.0. The study’s findings provide a history of court services policies that were traditional until Indonesia implemented electronic justice.

Keywords: digitization, e-court, e-litigation, court services, electronic justice

[1] UU 48 tahun 2009. 2009.

[2] Agung KM, Indonesia R. Ketua mahkamah agung republik indonesia. 2007.

[3] Kinerja L, Pemerintah I. Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. 2019.

[4] Hanum Z, Syahr A. Evaluasi Penerapan Standar Akreditasi Penjaminan Mutu Pengadilan Dengan Importance Performance Analysis Evaluation the Implementation of Court Quality Accreditation Standard Using Importance Performance Analysis. 2019;115–124.

[5] Jenderal D, Peradilan B. Peraturan 25 tahun 2009. 2018.

[6] Syahr ZHA. Dinamika Digitalisasi Manajemen Layanan Pengadilan. 2020;3(sosial dan humaniora):1–8.

[7] Faizatus P, Perkara B, Pengadilan DI. Sistem informasi penelusuran perkara (sipp): 2017;1(1).

[8] Kartini F. Dampak Kebijakan Pemekaran Desa pada Aspek Pelayanan Publik Di Desa Sadar Kecamatan Bone-Bone Kabuaten Luwu Utara. Universitas Negeri Makasar. 2016.

[9] Atikah I. Imp lemen tas i E-Court dan Dampakny a Te rhadap Advokat Da lam Proses Penye les aian Pe rkara di Indones ia. 2018;107–127.

[10] SK Pedoman PTSP Badilag 2018.pdf.