Published date: May 26 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (ICASI)

Pages: 625–633

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i9.13377

Ahmad Sadzalisadzali@uii.ac.idDepartement of Constitutional Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Jamaludin GhafurDepartement of Constitutional Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Idul RishanDepartement of Constitutional Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

The issuance of the latest Constitutional Court Law, Law Number 7 of 2020 on the Third Amendment to Law Number 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court, does not bring significant changes in the mechanism for monitoring constitutional court justices and the enforcement of the Code of Ethics and Conduct of Constitutional Justices. This paper aimed to offer a more holistic means of supervising constitutional court judges. The idea is a triangle of supervision consisting of internal control of individual judges, internal control of the institution, and external supervision.

Keywords: Supervision of Judges/Justices, Constitutional Court, Code of Ethics, Judges Integrity 

[1] Andrade J, Hamza KM, Xara-Brasil DM. Business ethics: international analysis of codes of ethics and conduct. Rev. Bras. Mark. 2017;16(1):1–15.

[2] Haris A. Pengantar Etika Islam. Sidoarjo: Al-Afkar; 2007.

[3] Rahman SNQ. Etika Profesi Hukum. Refleksi. 2014.

[4] Suriasumantri JS. Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta; 2009.

[5] Kusumohamidjojo B. Teori Hukum: Dilema antara Hukum dan Kekuasaan. Bandung: Penerbit Yrama Widya; 2016.

[6] TriwulanTutik T; T. TriwulanTutik. Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Pengawasan Hakim Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Ri 1945. J. Din. Huk. 2012;12(2): https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.2.51.

[7] International Bar Association Code of Minimum Standard of Judicial Independence.

[8] Boccio KM, Cashen M, Joseph A. Schwartz, “The Influence of Low Self-Control and Thoughtfully Reflective Decision Making on Criminal Justice Processing,”. Am J Crim Justice. 2022;47(3):506–25.

[9] J. A. al-F. A. I. al-J. Al-Baghdadi, Shaidu al-Khathir. Beirut: Darul Kutub al-’Ilmiyah, 1992.

[10] Malik, “Perspektif Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006,”. J. Huk. 2007;1(2).

[11] Ashar A. Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial dalam pengangkatan Hakim Agung Berdasarkan pada UU Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial dalam Jurnal DAHA. J. DAHA. 2009;1(42).

[12] Farkašová S. The constitutional reform of the Judicial Council in the Slovak Republic from the European comparative context. Juridical Trib. 2022;12(2).