Published date: May 26 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Advance & Scientific Innovation (ICASI)

Pages: 616–624

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i9.13376

Sefriani .sefriani@uii.ac.idDepartment of International Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Jawahir ThontowiDepartment of International Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Sri WartiniDepartment of International Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

This study aimed to examine how the Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE) project negatively affected the human rights of the surrounding communities and what steps the government should undertake to achieve food sovereignty without infringing on the rights of the indigenous peoples involved in the initiative. This study employed a conceptual and historical approach and was analyzed qualitatively. The findings of this research indicated that the affected communities, particularly the Malind Anim tribe, experienced human rights violations, including those related to land rights; the right to work; the right to a reasonable standard of living; the right to a safe and healthy environment; the right to food and clothing since they were no longer able to meet and produce their own food needs, and infringement of the rights to culture; self-determination; and free, initiative, and informed consent; as well as the rights to freedom of expression; expression of opinion; and the right to gather. As a result of these violations, the ability of the environment to support life is lost, which has the potential to alight genocide. The suggested solution is to reinstate MIFEE’s original intent, implement moratoriums, evaluate the projects that negatively impacted indigenous peoples’ anthropology and ecology, and provide access to comprehensive forest conversion information. Affected communities are also encouraged to participate fully and effectively, and the granting of permits must consider the principle of justice.

Keywords: Food sovereignty, human rights, Malind Anim

[1] I. A. P. d. J. H. Wijaya, “THE COMPARISON OF FOOD POLICY ERA THE LEADERSHIP OF SOEHARTO AND SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO,”. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah. 2018;2(1):65–80.

[2] INDEKS KETAHANAN PANGAN SINGAPURA TERTINGGI DI DUNIA, DIAKSES DI, 23 NOPEMEBR. [Online]. Available: HTTPS://DATABOKS.KATADATA.CO.ID/DATAPUBLISH/2019/12/13/INDEKSKETAHANAN- PANGAN-SINGAPURA-TERTINGGI-DI-DUNIA. [Accessed 23 November 2022].

[3] IMQ. Bulog Tak Punya Peran Jaga Ketahanan Pangan - IMQ | Indonesia”, diakses 15 Oktober 2022 di ... [Online]. Available: http://202.72.218.170/news/read/87151/20120831/154249/Bulog-Tak- Punya-Peran-Jaga-Ketahanan-Pangan.html. [Accessed 15 October 2022].

[4] Pillay S. “India Sinking: Threats to the right to food, Food security & Development in an ERA of Economic Growth,” Windsor Y.B. Windsor Yearb Access Justice. 2009;27(1):133.

[5] Yeny I, Garsetiasih R, Suharti S, Gunawan H, Sawitr R. Examining the Socio-Economic and Natural Resource Risks of Food Estate Development on Peatlands: A Strategy for Economic Recovery and Natural Resource Sustainability. Sustainability (Basel). 2022;14(7):3961.

[6] Santosa E. Percepatan Pengembangan Food Estate Untuk Meningkatkan Ketahanan dan Kemandirian Pangan Nasional. Risalah Kebijakan Pertanian dan Lingkungan. 2014;1(2):

[7] Ramadayanti ER. Perlindungan Hak Masyarakat Adat setelah Satu Dasawarsa Program MIFEE (Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate) Melalui Citizen Law Suit. Padjadjaran Law Journal. 2020;8(2):82.

[8] Rosita D. “Gaining Recognition Through Participatory Mapping? The Role of Adat Land in the Implementation of the Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate in Papua, Indonesia,” Austrian. J Southeast Asian Stud. ;9(1):2.

[9] Ginting L, Pye O. Resisting Agribusiness Development: The Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate in West Papua, Indonesia. Austrian Journal of South - East Asian Studie. 2013;6(1):160-

[10] McDonnell JE. The Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE): An Ecologically Induced Genocide of the Malind Anim. J Genocide Res. 2020.

[11] T. R. N. F. &. S. L. Ito, ”Kekuasaan untuk membuat perampasan lahan dapat diterima: Analisis wacana kebijakan mengenai Integrated Food And Energy Estate (MIFEE) Merauke, Papua, Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Petani. 2014;41(1):29–50.

[12] Franky Y. Mega Proyek MIFEE: Suku Malind Anim dan Pelanggaran HAM, ELSAM. [Online]. Available: https://referensi.elsam.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/ 12/Mega-Proyek-MIFEE-Suku-malin-Animdan-Pelanggaran-HAM.pdf. [Accessed 22 November 2022].

[13] Zakaria RE. MIFEE: Tak Terjangkau Angan Malind C a t a t a n a t a s u p a y a p e r c e p a t a n pembangunan MIFEE di Kabupaten Merauke. Jakarta (Papua): Yayasan Pusaka; 2011.

[14] Setiawan T. ”Ethnodevelopment: Solusi atas Kegagalan Kebijakan Pembangunan Kapitalistik pada Masyarakat Adat,” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 324703953_Ethnodevelopment_Solusi_atas_Kegagalan_Kebijakan_Pembangunan_Kapitalistik_[Accessed November 23 2022].

[15] D. S. N. A. Purwiyatno Hariyadi, Mewaspadai Jebakan Pangan di Indonesia, Rangkuman Hasil Diskusi Panel ”Kebijakan Pangan untuk Menangkal Jebakan Pangan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2003.

[16] Iskandar, “Aktualisasi Prinsip Hukum Pelestarian Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Kebijakan perubahan Peruntukan,Fungsi, dan penggunaan Kawasan Hutan,”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 2011;11(3):534.