Published date: Mar 03 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 2nd Paris Van Java International Seminar on Health, Economics, Social Science and Humanities (PVJ-ISHESSH 2021)

Pages: 11–19

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i4.12877

Sistiana Windyarianiwindyariani@ummi.ac.idProgram Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi, Jl. R. Syamsudin S.H. No,50, Sukabumi 43113 Indonesia

Aa JuhandaProgram Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi, Jl. R. Syamsudin S.H. No,50, Sukabumi 43113 Indonesia

Setiono .Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi, Jl. R. Syamsudin S.H. No,50, Sukabumi 43113 Indonesia

Suhendar .Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi, Jl. R. Syamsudin S.H. No,50, Sukabumi 43113 Indonesia

This descriptive study aims to determine the comparison of scientific literacy competence domain appearance in task questions of biology electronic school books (BSE) at each grade of high school. The subjects of this study consisted of 1,650 questions contained in the 2009 edition of the BSE Biology book for grade X, XI, and XII which were determined by purposive sampling technique which included sample questions and question exercises. The instrument used in this study was a document analysis sheet about the domain of scientific literacy competencies. The results of the task question analysis show that the higher level of the grade, the aspect of explaining scientific phenomena and aspects of interpreting data and scientific evidence has increased compared to the aspects of evaluating and designing scientific research that tends not to appear at each grade level. Therefore, based on these results it can be concluded scientific literacy competence domain appearance in task questions of high school biology electronic school books are not distributed well, so it needs improvement in the preparation of these questions in order to increase the domain of students’ scientific literacy competences.

Keywords: question domain of scientific literacy, Biology School Book (BSE)

[1] Rahayu S. Menuju Masyarakat berliterasi sains: Harapan dan tantangan kurikulum 2013. kimia.um.ac.id. 2014.

[2] Safitri A, Erman, Admoko S. Pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan literasi sains SMP. Pendidikan Sains. 2016;4(02):7-14.

[3] OECD. Pisa 2012 results in focus: What 15 year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. New York: Columbia University; 2013.

[4] Basam F, Rusilowati A, Ridlo S. Profil kompetensi sains siswa dalam pembelajaran literasi sains berpendekatan inkuiri saintifik. PSEJ. 2018;3(1):1-8.

[5] Narut YF, Supardi K. Literasi sains peserta didik dalam pembelajaran IPA di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar. 2019;3(1):61-69.

[6] OECD. PISA 2015 Draft mathematics framework. New York: Columbia University; 2015.

[7] Toharudin U. Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Bandung: Humaniora; 2011.

[8] Windyariani S, Setiono, Sutisnawati A. Pengembangan model asesmen literasi sains berbasis konteks bagi siswa sekolah dasar. Seminar nasional kedua pendidikan berkemajuan dan menggembirakan (The second progressive and fun education seminar) Ke-2. Solo: Univeristas Muhammadiyah Surakarta; 2017.

[9] Delil H. An analysis of geometry problems in 6-8 grades Turkish mathematics [Phd thesis]. Middle East technical University; 2006.

[10] Juhanda A. Analisis soal jenjang kognitif taksonomi bloom revisi pada buku sekolah elektronik (BSE) biologi SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA UPI. 2016;21(1):61-66.

[11] Bamoyo QNW. Analisis soal-soal dalam bse (buku sekolah elektronik), un (ujian nasional) dan Timss (Trends in international mathematics and science study) Ditinjau dari domain kognitif dan indikator keterampilan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika ( JIPF). 2014;03(01):8-14.

[12] Mawardini A, Permanasari A, Sanjaya Y. Profil literasi sains siswa SMP pada pembelajaran IPA terpadu tema pencemaran lingkungan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal), Volume IV, Oktober 2015. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta; 2015.

[13] OECD. Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy – A framework for PISA 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016.

[14] Arikunto S. Evaluasi program pendidikan- Pedoman teoritis peraktis bagi mahasiswa dan praktisi pendidikan edisi kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2008.

[15] Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

[16] Permanasari A. Teori, paradigma, prinsip dan pendekatan pembelajaran MIPA dalam konteks Indonesia. Bandung: JICA-FMIPA UPI; 2010.

[17] Novili WI, Saepuzaman D, Karim S. Penerapan scientific approach dalam upaya melatihkan literasi saintifik dalam domain kompetensi dan domain pengetahuan siswa SMP pada topik kalor. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika. 2017;8(1):57-63.

[18] Setiono, Nuranti G, Mariana M. Meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik melalui aktivitas saintifik dan visualisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains ( JPS) 2020;8(1):27-31.

[19] National Research Council. Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press; 2000.

[20] Fakhriyah F, Masfuah S, Mardapi D. Developing scientific literacy-based teaching materials to improve students’ computational thinking skills. JPII. 2019;8(4):482-491.