Published date: Feb 24 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Politics, Social, and Humanities Sciences (2nd ICPSH 2022)

Pages: 299–310

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i3.12836

Reggie Tenterotenteroryjj@gmail.comDoctoral Program Student Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto

Pancasila, in the 5th precept, is social justice for all Indonesians. This means that justice that is the ideal of the Indonesian nation is justice that is socially just. The revitalization of Pancasila is the key to restoring and growing social justice in business competition in the global era for small business actors. The implementation of Pancasila revitalization of small business actors in global business competition can be done by making waivers to the Ministerial Conference to follow up on the non-discriminatory principle of business competition against small business actors to get exemptions, so that the value of social justice contained in Pancasila can be realized, especially for small business actors. The existence of the non-discriminatory principle on the implementation of Pancasila revitalization of global business competition to small entrepreneurs is still recognized for its existence, considering that there is no follow-up to the disharmony of regulations in the WTO and business competition law in Indonesia, especially regarding the application of non-discriminatory principles to business competition specifically for small business actors. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a problem approach that has the purpose and purpose of reviewing applicable laws and regulations as well as literature with a theoretical concept, then connected with the problems that are the subject of discussion discussed in this research writing.

Keywords: Pancasila, non-discriminatory principles, global business competition, small/medium enterprises

[1] Taufiq A. Refleksi Atas Revitalisasi Nilai Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Dalam Mengeleminasi Kejahatan Korupsi. UNIVERSUM J Keislam dan Kebud. 2015;9(1). https://doi.org/10.30762/universum.v9i1.73.

[2] Simanjuntak TH, Mukhlis I, Pratama A. Demokrasi Ekonomi Pancasila, Ekonomi Berdikari dalam Menghadapi Arus Globalisasi-Revolusi Industri 4.0. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ekonomi Pembangunan. 2021. p. 91–108.

[3] Deliabilda SA, Marlisa V, Anditya FS, Ariana T, Dasman S. Penerapan Nilai-nilai Ekonomi Pancasila dalam Percepatan Ekonomi Inklusif di Era Society 5.0. Pros EMAS Ekon Manaj Akunt Kewirausahaan. 2021;1(1):1–20.

[4] Mahmud Marzuki P. Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media; 2005. p. 55.

[5] Soemantri S. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pemikiran dan Pandangan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2014.

[6] Leback K. Six Theories of Justice (Teori-Teori Keadilan: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Pemikiran JS Mill. John Rawls, Robert Nozick, Reinhold Neibuhr, Jose Porfirio Miranda), diterjemahkan oleh Yudi Santoso. Bandung: Nusamedia; 1986.

[7] Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Univ. Press; https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605.

[8] Nahak A. Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perjanjian Dan Kegiatan Yang Dilarang Atas Perusahan Diluar Yuridiksi Teritorial Hukum Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 07/Kppu-L/2007). J Ilmu Huk. 2017;6(2):131–42.

[9] Hakim DA. Pengecualian Perjanjian Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Fiat Justisia J Ilmu Huk. 2015;9(4).

[10] Surinda Y. Pengetahuan Hukum, Tips & Info Bermanfaat [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 Aug 31]. Available from: https://yuokysurinda.wordpress.com/2016/02/10/prinsipmost- favoured-nation-dan-national-treatment-di-indonesia/

[11] Erawaty AF. Globalisasi Ekonomi dan Perdagangan Bebas: Suatu Pengantar, dalam buku Aspek Hukum dari Perdagangan Bebas. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti; 2003.

[12] Adolf H. Hukum perdagangan internasional. PT RajaGrafindo Persada; 2006.