KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Online Learning Acceptance Model of Indonesian Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Published date: Feb 17 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 2nd International Conference on Science and Its Applications “Sustainable Innovation in Natural Science, Economic and Business Science, and Social Science” (ICOSIAS)

Pages: 196–210

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i2.12764

Authors:

Fachri Eka Saputrafachri_mgt@unib.ac.idDepartment of Management, University of Bengkulu, JL. WR. Supratman Kandang Limun Muara Bangkahulu, Kota Bengkulu, 38371, Indonesia

Andi MakhrianDepartment of Communication Science, University of Bengkulu, JL. WR. Supratman Kandang Limun Muara Bangkahulu, Kota Bengkulu, 38371, Indonesia

Berlian Satya GrahatamaDepartment of Management, University of Bengkulu, JL. WR. Supratman Kandang Limun Muara Bangkahulu, Kota Bengkulu, 38371, Indonesia

Abstract:

This study examines the application of the Technological Acceptance Model (TAM) concept proposed by Davis et al. (1989) to be adopted in online learning in higher education during the Covid-19 pandemic. The quantitative method with purposive sampling method was applied in this study to answer the research question. The online survey was used as a method of data collection. The result of this study contributes to the body of knowledge and gives some practical recommendations for this research.

Keywords: attitude toward use, behavior intention, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use.

References:

[1] Zhang W, Wang Y, Yang L, Wang C. Suspending Classes without Stopping Learning: China’s Education Emergency Management Policy in the COVID-19 Outbreak. J. Risk Finance. Manag. 2020;13(3):55.


[2] Chang CT, Hajiyev J, Su CR. Examining the Student’s Behavioral Intention to Use E-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning Approach. Comput Educ. 2017;111:128–43.


[3] Raaper R, Brown C. The Covid-19 pandemic and the dissolution of the university campus: implications for student support practice. J Prof Cap Community. 2020;5( 3 /4):343–9.


[4] Gikas J, Grant MM. Mobile computing devices in higher education: student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social 229 media. Internet High Educ. 2013;19:18–26.


[5] Koc M. Learning Analytics of Student Participation and Achievement in Online Distance Education: A Structural Equation Modeling. Educ Sci Theor Pract. 2017;17(6):1893–910.


[6] Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A. Personal Learning Environments, social media, and Self- Regulated Learning: A Natural Formula for Connecting Formal and Informal Learning. Internet High Educ. 2007;15(1):3–8.


[7] Quartiroli A, Knight SM, Etzel EF, Monaghan M. Using Skype to facilitate team-based qualitative research, including the process of data analysis. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(6):1–8.


[8] Matthews KL, Baird M, Duchesne G. Using Online Meeting Software to Facilitate Geographically Dispersed Focus Groups for Health Workforce Research. Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1621–8.


[9] Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, Lawless M. Using Zoom Video conferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:1–8.


[10] Hsu SY, Beasley RE. The effects of international email and Skype interactions on computer-mediated communication perceptions and attitudes and intercultural competence in Taiwanese students. Australas J Educ Technol. 2019;35(1):149–62.


[11] Dixon RA, Hall C, Shawon F. Using Virtual Reality and Web Conferencing Technologies: Exploring Alternatives for Microteaching in a Rural Region, Northwest. J Teach Educ. 2019;14(1):1–18.


[12] Fedic D, Krelova KK. Skype-based Educational Method: Experiences in Language Learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Humanities, Literature, and Management (ICHLM’15). Dubai.


[13] Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Manage Inf Syst Q. 1989;13(3):319–40.


[14] Aakers and Myers. Advertising Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1997.


[15] Hanggono, et al. Analisis atas Praktek TAM. (Technology Acceptance Model) dalam Mendukung Bisnis Online dengan Memanfaatkan Jejaring Sosial Instagram. Jurnal AB: Universitas Brawijaya. 2015;26(1).


[16] Jan MW, de Jager J, Ameziane A, Sultan N. Applying Technology Acceptance Model to Investigate the Use of Smartphone Advertising in Malaysia. J Econ Behav Stud. 2019;11(1):202–10.


[17] Cheung R, Vogel D. Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: an extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Comput Educ. 2013;63:160–75.


[18] Hussein Z. Subjective Norm and Perceived Enjoyment Among Students in Influencing the Intention to Use E-Learning [IJCIET]. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 2018;9(13):852–8.


[19] Brown MD. 2000. Education World: Technology in the Classroom: Virtual High Schools, Part 1, The Voices of Experience (sumber dari internet 16 September 2021: http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech052.shtml)


[20] Hanum NS. Keefektifan e-learning sebagai media pembelajaran (studi eval- uasi model pembelajaran e-learning SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Purwokerto. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Jurnal pendidikan vokasi 2013;3(1). journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpu/article/view/1584/1314


[21] Sandiwarno S. Perancangan Model E-Learning Berbasis Collaborative Video Conference Learning Guna Mendapatkan Hasil Pembelajaran yang Efektif dan Efisien. Jurnal Ilmiah FIFO. 2016;8(2):191.


[22] Elyas AH. Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran E-Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Warta. 2018;56(04):1–11.


[23] Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003.


[24] Lee MK, Cheung CM, Chen Z. Acceptance of Internet-Based Learning Medium: The Role of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation. Inf Manage. 2005;42(8):1095–104.


[25] Rizun M, Strzelecki A. Students’ Acceptance of the COVID-19 Impact on Shifting Higher Education to Distance Learning in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep;17(18):6468.


[26] Shanmugam, Arunagiri, Savarimuthu, Michael Thaz, Wen, Teoh Chai. Factors Affecting Malaysian Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Banking with Mediating Effects of Attitude. Acad Res Int. 2014;5(2):236–53.


[27] Park SY. An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning. J Educ Technol Soc. 2009;12(3):150–62. Available from: https://library3.hud.ac.uk/summon/


[28] Pertiwi, N, Sharif, O. O. Minat Perilaku Penggunaan Youtube Sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan TAM. Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen, 2019;12(1):9-15. https://doi.org/10.23969/jrbm.v12i1.1522.


[29] Tan, P. J. B. An Empirical Study of How the Learning Attitudes of College Students toward English E-Tutoring Websites Affect Site Sustainability. Sustainability. 2019;11(1748):1-19.


[30] Smet, C. D., Bourgonjon, J., Wever, B. D., Schellens, T, Valcke, M. Researching instructional use and the technology acceptance of learning management systems by secondary school teachers. Computers & Education. 2012;58(2):688-696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.. 2011.09.013.


[31] Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Manage Inf Syst Q. 2003;27(3):425–78.


[32] Thieu, T.Q., Lin, C.C., Le, H.N, & Nguyen, V.Q. (2013). Factors Affecting the Use Of E-Payment in A Developing Country–Vietnam as A Case. IADIS International Conference.


[33] Al-Maroof RS, Al-Emran M. Students’ acceptance of Google classroom: an exploratory study using PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2018;13(6):112–23.


[34] Abbas HA, Hamdy HI. Determinants of continuance intention factor in Kuwait communication market: A case study of Zain-Kuwait. Comput Human Behav. 2015;49:648–57.


[35] Liu SH, Liao HL, Pratt JA. Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Comput Educ. 2009;52(3):599–607.


[36] Lin HF. Measuring online learning systems success: applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Dec;10(6):817–20.


[37] Jogiyanto. Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: Pendekatan Terstruktur Teori dan Praktek Aplikasi Bisnis; 2008.


[38] Guriting P, Ndubisi NO. Borneo online banking: evaluating customer perceptions and behavioral intention. Manage Res News. 2006;29(1/2):6–15.


[39] Al-Somali SA, Gholami R, Clegg B. An investigation into the acceptance of online banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation. 2008;29(2):130–41.


[40] Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. Manage Inf Syst Q. 1992;16(2):227–47.


[41] Nagy JT. Evaluation of Online Video Usage and Learning Satisfaction: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2018;19(1):160–85.


[42] Nasri, W dan Charfeddine, L. Factors affecting the adoption of Internet banking in Tunisia: An integration theory of acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2012


[43] Amin, Rezaei S, Abolghasemi M. User Satisfaction with Mobile Websites: The impact of Perceived usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Trust. Nankai Bus Rev Int. 2014;5(3):258–74.


[44] Moon J, Kim Y. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Inf Manage. 2001;38(4):217–30.


[45] Gefen D, Straub D. Managing user trust in B2C e-services. E-serv J. 2003;2(2):7–24.


[46] Hair JF, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis 6 th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.; 2007.


[47] Hair J, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. United States: Pearson; 2010.


[48] Monny MO. The Effectiveness of Using Questions Technique to Improve Students’ Writing of Recount Text. Austronesian: Journal of Language Science & Literature. 2022;1(1):29–37.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

239 Abstract Views

311 PDF Downloads