Published date: Feb 01 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries (EBEEC)

Pages: 194–212

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i1.12647

Valerija Botrićvbotric@eizg.hrThe Institute of Economics, Zagreb, Trg J.F. Kennedy 7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Environmentally oriented firms are more pressed for resources in general, especially during periods of economic downturn. Since their business plans are frequently more innovative, they are perceived as riskier by financial institutions. Furthermore, the recent global COVID-19 crisis was not primarily related to financial disruptions, and most governments provided generous and widespread support to different segments of their economies. However, the evidence on the degree to which firms were faced with access to finance problems during this crisis is still scarce. This paper aims to explore the extent to which environmentally-oriented firms in post-transition economies are disproportionally affected by the financial constraints related to the market disruptions caused by COVID-19 pandemics compared to non-environmentally oriented firms. The World Bank Enterprise Survey 2019 has been used to investigate this issue. Based on this data source, an indicator of firm environmental proactivity is developed. The firms’ financial constraints in the pandemic period are evaluated based on the responses from the three survey rounds of the World Bank COVID-19 follow-up enterprise survey, covering different stages of the pandemic. The post-transition countries in the analysis are heterogeneous, consisting of both EU members (Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovakia, and Slovenia) and EU accession countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia). The lowest percentage of firms having an environmental strategy was found in Croatia, while the highest percentage is in Slovenia. Based on the results, it can be concluded that firms adopting environmental strategies in analyzed countries mostly follow regulations and/or chose low-cost measures.

Keywords: financial constraints, pro-environmental orientation, post-transition, COVID- 19

[1] Adams R, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J, Denyer D, Ovary P. Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2016;18(2):180–205.

[2] Aidis R, Estrin S, Mickiewicz T. Institutions, finance and the level of development: The impact on entrepreneurship in transition. Review of Economics and Institutions. 2010;1(1):a3.

[3] Alt E, Díez-de-Castro EP, Lloréns-Montes FJ. Linking employee stakeholders to environmental performance: The role of proactive environmental strategies and shared vision. Journal of Business Ethics. 2015;128(1):167–181.

[4] Ameer R, Othman R. Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics. 2012;108(1):61–79.

[5] Anderson MS. Ecological modernization or subversion. American Behavioral Scientist. 2002;45(9):1394–1416.

[6] Betts TK, Super JF, North J. Exploring the influence of institutional pressures and production capability on the environmental practices – Environmental performance relationship in advanced and developing economies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;187:1082–1093.

[7] Bakker FGA, Fisscher OAM, Brack AJP. Organizing product-oriented environmental management from a firm’s perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2002;10(5):455–464.

[8] Balaton K. Attitude of Hungarian companies towards challenges created by EU accession. Journal for East European Management Studies. 2005;10(3):247–258.

[9] Bui B, De Villiers C. Business strategies and management accounting in response to climate change risk exposure and regulatory uncertainty. The British Accounting Review. 2017;49(1):4–24.

[10] Buysse K, Verbeke A. Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal. 2003;24(5):453–470.

[11] Carballo-Penela A, Castromán-Diz JL. Environmental policies for sustainable development: An analysis of the drivers of proactive environmental strategies in the service sector. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2015;24(8):802–818.

[12] Cordeiro JJ, Sarkis J. Environmental proactivism and firm performance: Evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment. 1997;6(2):104–114.

[13] Dangelico RM, Pontrandolfo P. From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2010;18(16–17):1608–1628.

[14] Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P. Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies. 2010;47(6):1072–1094.

[15] David P, O’Brien JP, Yoshikava T, Delios A. Do shareholders or stakeholders appropriate the rents from corporate diversification? The influence of ownership structure. Academy of Management Journal. 2010;53(3):636–654.

[16] Davidson DJ, Freudenburg WR. Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior. 1996;28(3):302–339.

[17] De Marchi V. Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy. 2012;41(3):614–623.

[18] Delmas M, Hoffmann VH, Kuss M. Under the tip of the iceberg: Absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Business & Society. 2011;50(1):116–154.

[19] Earnhart D, Lizal L. The effect of corporate environmental performance on financial outcomes – Profits, revenues and costs: Evidence from the Czech transition economy. DRUID Working Paper No. 10–15. 2010. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/reader/6575282

[20] Elijido-Ten E. Applying stakeholder theory to analyze corporate environmental performance: Evidence from Australian listed companies. Asian Review of Accounting. 2007;15(2):164–184.

[21] Elsayed K. Reexamining the expected effects of available resources and firm size on firm environmental orientation: An empirical study of UK firms. Journal of Business Ethics. 2006;65(3):297–308.

[22] Engau C, Hoffmann VH. Effects of regulatory uncertainty on corporate strategy—An analysis of firms’ responses to uncertainty about post-Kyoto policy. Environmental Science & Policy. 2009;12(7):766–777.

[23] Gilley KM, Worrell DL, Davidson WN, El-Jelly A. Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: The differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of Management. 2000;26(6):1199–1216.

[24] Halladay JS. Exporters and the environment. Canadian Journal of Economics. 2016;49(1):147–172.

[25] Harms D, Hansen EG, Schaltegger S. Strategies in sustainable supply chain management: An empirical investigation of large German companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2013;20(4):205–218.

[26] Hart SL. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(4):986–1014.

[27] Hartmann J, Vachon S. Linking environmental management to environmental performance: The interactive role of industry context. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2018;27(3):359–374.

[28] Judge W, Douglas T. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies. 1998;35(2):241–262.

[29] Keszey T. Environmental orientation, sustainable behavior at the firm-market interface and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;243:e.118524.

[30] Kikuchi R. The relation between privatization policy and environmental problems in countries with transitional economies. Japanese Slavic and East European Studies. 1999;20:85–94.

[31] Kim TH, Kim B. Firm’s environmental expenditure, R&D intensity, and profitability. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):e.2071.

[32] King A, Lenox M. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science. 2002;48(2):289–299.

[33] Lanoie P, Laurent-Lucchetti J, Johnston N, Ambec S. Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights of the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 2011;20(3):803–842.

[34] Lee KH, Cin BC, Lee EY. Environmental responsibility and firm performance: The application of an environmental, social and governance model. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2016;25(1):40–53.

[35] Lee SY, Rhee SK. The change in corporate environmental strategies: A longitudinal empirical study. Management Decision. 2007;45(2):196–216.

[36] Link S, Naveh E. Standardization and discretion: Does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2006;53(4):508–519.

[37] Liu Y, Guo J, Chi N. The antecedents and performance consequences of proactive environmental strategy: A meta-analytic review of national contingency. Management and Organization Review. 2015;11(3):521–557.

[38] López-Gamero MD, Molina-Azorín JF, Claver-Cortés E. The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: Competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables. Journal of Environmental Management. 2009;90(10):3110–3121.

[39] Manrique S, Martí-Ballester CP. Analyzing the effect of corporate environmental performance on corporate financial performance in developed and developing countries. Sustainability. 2017;9(11):19–57.

[40] Melnyk SA, Sroufe RP, Calantone R. Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management. 2003;21(3):329–351.

[41] Menguc B, Auh S, Ozanne L. The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010;94(2):279–298.

[42] Miles MP, Covin JG. Environmental marketing: A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics. 2000;23(3):299–311.

[43] Molina-Azorín JF, Claver-Cortés E, López-Gamero MD, Tarí JR. Green management and financial performance: A literature review. Management Decision. 2009;47(7):1080–1100.

[44] Molina-Azorín JF, Claver-Cortés E, Pereira-Moliner J, Tarí JJ. Environmental practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis in the Spanish hotel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2009;17(5):516–524.

[45] Murillo-Luna JL, Garcés-Ayerbe C, Rivera-Torres P. Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2011;19(13):1417– 1425.

[46] Orsato RJ. Competitive environmental strategies: when does it pay to be green? Strategic Direction. 2006;22(8):127–144.

[47] Porter ME, van der Linde C. Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review. 1995;73(5)120–134.

[48] Pujari D. Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation. 2006;26(1):76–85.

[49] Russo MV, Fouts PA. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal. 1997;40(3):534– 559.

[50] Ryszko A. Proactive environmental strategy, technological eco-innovation and firm performance - Case of Poland. Sustainability. 2016;8(2):e.156.

[51] Schaltegger S, Synnestvedt T. The link between ’green’ and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management. 2002;65(4):339– 346.

[52] Sharma S, Henriques I. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal. 2005;26(2):159– 180.

[53] Söderholm P. Environmental policy in transition economies: Will pollution charges work? Journal of Environment & Development. 2001;10(4):365–390.

[54] Sprenger C. The choice of ownership structure: Evidence from Russian mass privatization. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2011;39(2):260–277.

[55] Stadtler L, Lin H. Moving to the next strategy stage: Examining firms’ awareness, motivation and capability drivers in environmental alliances. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2017;26(6):709–730.

[56] Symeou PC, Zyglidopoulos S, Gardberg NA. Corporate environmental performance: Revisiting the role of organizational slack. Journal of Business Research. 2019;96:169–182.

[57] Tetrault Sirsly CA, Sur S. Strategies for sustainability initiatives: Why ownership matters. Corporate Governance. 2013;13(5):541–550.

[58] Tsai KH, Huang CT, Chen ZH. Understanding variation in the relationship between environmental management practices and firm performance across studies: A metaanalytic review. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020;29(2):547–565.

[59] Wang S, Li J, Zhao D. Institutional pressures and environmental management practices: The moderating effects of environmental commitment and resource availability. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2018;27(1):52–69.

[60] Wu J. Differentiated customer pressures and environmental policies in China. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2015;24(3):175–189.

[61] Yang D, Jiang W, Zhao W. Proactive environmental strategy, innovation capability, and stakeholder integration capability: A mediation analysis. Business, Strategy and the Environment. 2019;28(8):1534–1547.

[62] Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues. 2000;56(3):443–457.