KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Pre-service EFL Teachers' Conceptions of Assessment During Their Teaching Practicum

Published date: Dec 21 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 5th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE)

Pages: 615–626

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i19.12480

Authors:

Entika Fani Prastikawatientikafani@upgris.ac.idUniversitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Januarius MujiyantoUniversitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Mursid SalehUniversitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Sri WuliFitriatiUniversitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Abstract:

Teacher education programs across the globe include a practicum as a required part of their curriculum. The practicum is also viewed as a gateway between theoretical and practical aspects of teaching, enabling prospective teachers to acquire the specific skills and approaches they will need in the classroom. Teaching practicum also provides pre-service EFL teachers with the opportunity to put their assessment knowledge into practice. During the teaching practicum, pre-service EFL teachers may encounter extraordinary changes. This study reports on their conceptions of assessment during the teaching practicum. Some contextual factors shaping their conceptions are also observed. By utilizing a mixed-method study, this study adopted a model of participant selection. In this case, the quantitative method is carried out before the qualitative method. The quantitative data was used to identify participants for the qualitative portion of this mixed-methods study. The results showed that the participants agreed that the main objective of an assessment is to enhance the process of teaching and learning and to validate the students’ and schools’ accountability. Some factors, such as school assessment culture, national assessment policy, and classroom reality, are revealed as contextual factors influencing their conceptions of assessment during their teaching practicum. The findings imply that governments, policymakers, and curriculum developers must collaborate with educators to achieve common goals. The national and school assessment policy must be created in a manner that avoids conflict between pre-service EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices.

Keywords: conceptions of assessment; teaching practicum, pre-service EFL teachers

References:

[1] Babaii E, Asadnia F. A long walk to language assessment literacy: EFL teachers’ reflection on language assessment research and practice. Reflective Practice. 2019;20:745–760.

[2] Fan YC, Wang TH, Wang KH. A web-based model for developing assessment literacy of secondary in-service teachers. Computers & Education. 2011;57:1727–1740.

[3] Coombe C, Vafadar H, Mohebbi H. Language assessment literacy: What do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn? Language Testing in Asia. 2020;10:1–6.

[4] Giraldo F. Language assessment literacy and teachers’ professional development: A review of the literature. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development. 2021;23:265–279.

[5] Kremmel B, Harding L. Towards a comprehensive, empirical model of language assessment literacy across stakeholder groups: Developing the language assessment literacy survey. Language Assessment Quarterly. 2020;17:100–120.

[6] Levi T, Inbar-Lourie O. Assessment literacy or language assessment literacy: Learning from the teachers. Language Assessment Quarterly. 2020;17:168–182.

[7] Sultana N. Language assessment literacy: An uncharted area for the English language teachers in Bangladesh. Language Testing in Asia. 2019;9:1–4.

[8] Puspawati I. Understanding teachers’ knowledge, skills, and principles on language assessment: a survey on teachers’ language assessment literacy. Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019–Humanity, Education and Social Sciences (IcoSIHESS 2019). Atlantis Press; 2019. p. 70–75.

[9] Zulaiha S, Mulyono H, Ambarsari L. An investigation into EFL teachers’ assessment literacy: Indonesian teachers’ perceptions and classroom practice. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2020;9:189–201.

[10] Luthfiyyah R, Basyari IW, Dwiniasih D. EFL secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Assessment conceptions and practices. Journal on English as a Foreign Language. 2020;10:402–421.

[11] Nyudak IB. Assessment literacy of EFL Teachers in Badung, Bali, Indonesia: Conception and practices. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching. 2022;9:178–187.

[12] Opre D. Teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;209:229–233.

[13] Brown GT. Self-regulation of assessment beliefs and attitudes: A review of the students’ conceptions of assessment inventory. Educational Psychology. 2011;31:731–748.

[14] Lisyowati W, Wiyaka W, Prastikawati EF. English teachers’ conceptions of formative assessment in online teaching. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature. 2021;16:177–186.

[15] Peterson ER, Irving SE. Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction. 2008;18:238–250.

[16] Hidri S. Conceptions of assessment: Investigating what assessment means to secondary and university teachers. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2016;1:19–43.

[17] Brown GT. Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2004;11:301–318.

[18] Brown GT, Remesal A. Prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A crosscultural comparison. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 2012;15:75–89.

[19] Postareff L, Virtanen V, Katajavuori N, Lindblom-Ylänne S. Academics’ conceptions of assessment and their assessment practices. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2012;38:84–92.

[20] Xu Y, Brown GT. Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016;58:149–162.

[21] Lutovac S, Flores MA. Conceptions of assessment in pre-service teachers’ narratives of students’ failure. Cambridge Journal of Education. 2022;52:55–71.

[22] Tang EL, Lee JC, Chun CK. Development of teaching beliefs and the focus of change in the process of pre-service ESL teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2012;37:90–107.

[23] Aghabarari M, Rahimi M. EFL teachers’ conceptions of professional development during the practicum: Retrospective perceptions and prospective insights. Asian- Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 2020;5:1–9.

[24] Seden K, Svaricek R. Teacher subjectivity regarding assessment: Exploring English as a foreign language teachers’ conceptions of assessment theories that influence student learning. CEPS Journal. 2018;8:119–139.

[25] Gan Z, Ieong SS, Su Y, He J. Understanding Chinese EFL teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment: Implications for teacher assessment literacy development. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 2018;41:4–27.

[26] Ghaicha A, Omarkaly E. Alternative assessment in the Moroccan EFL classrooms teachers’ conceptions and practices. Higher Education of Social Science. 2018;14:56–68.

[27] Azis A. Teachers’ conceptions and use of assessment in student learning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2012;2:40–52.

[28] Azis A. Conceptions and practices of assessment: A case of teachers representing improvement conception. Teflin Journal. 2015;26:129–154.

[29] Deneen CC, Brown GT. The impact of conceptions of assessment on assessment literacy in a teacher education program. Cogent Education. 2016;3:1225380.

[30] Pastore S, Andrade HL. Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2019;84:128–138.

[31] Looney A, Cumming J, van Der Kleij F, Harris K. Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2018;25:442–467.

[32] DeLuca C, Valiquette A, Coombs A, LaPointe-McEwan D, Luhanga U. Teachers’ approaches to classroom assessment: A large-scale survey. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2018;25:355–375.

[33] Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. California, USA: SAGE Publications; 2018. p. 275.

[34] Levy-Vered A, Alhija FN. The power of a basic assessment course in changing preservice teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2018;59:84–93.

[35] Xu Y, He L. How pre-service teachers’ conceptions of assessment change over practicum: Implications for teacher assessment literacy. Frontiers in Education; 2019:145.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

452 Abstract Views

332 PDF Downloads