Published date: Oct 12 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Geography and Education (ICGE)

Pages: 45–58

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i16.12152

Lailissa'adah Lailissa'adahsulastri@fkip.unsyiah.ac.idStudent of Disaster Science/Postgraduate Program, Syiah Kuala University,

Sulastri SulastriChemical Education/ Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Syiah Kuala University,

Syamsidik SyamsidikCivil Engineering/ Faculty of Engineering, Syiah Kuala University

The 2004 earthquake and tsunami left a lot of sorrow in Indonesia, especially in Aceh. It was reported that 127,720 people died and 93,285 people were missing after the tsunami. The total damage and losses reached 41.4 trillion rupiah. One of the reasons for the high number of victims in Aceh was the lack of tsunami information and knowledge transfer. The purpose of this study was to analyze how tsunami knowledge transfer occurs across generations and the extent to which people possess basic knowledge about tsunamis. This study used a mixed-methods design. Surveys and interviews were used as the data collection techniques. There were 300 respondents selected with several criteria, spread from three sub-districts. These sub-districts were chosen based on the level of regional risk from low to high, namely Baiturrahman, Syiah Kuala, and Meuraxa sub-districts. In each sub-district, 100 people were included. The data were analyzed using descriptive methods. The results showed that there was a difference in the mechanism of tsunami knowledge transfer between pre-tsunami and post-tsunami generations. The pre-tsunami generation transferred the tsunami knowledge bidirectionally to contemporaries and the younger generation. The post-tsunami generation transferred the knowledge in one direction, contemporaneously. Lastly, factors that influenced tsunami knowledge transfer were: knowledge, experience, work, and the media. Keywords: knowledge transfer, tsunami

knowledge transfer, mechanism, knowledge transfer mechanism

[1] Mangkusubroto K. Analisis dinamika kolaborasi antara Badan Rehabilitasi dan Rekontruksi Aceh dan Nias (BRR) dengan Lembaga Donor Pasca Tsunami 2004 menggunakan Drama Theory. Journal of Technology Management. 2011;10(1):42– 63.

[2] Gaillard JC, Clavé E, Vibert O et al. Ethnic groups’ response to the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia. Natural Hazard. 2008;47(1):17–38.

[3] Bukhari B, Mudatsir M, Sari SA. Hubungan sikap tentang regulasi, pengetahuan dan sikap perawat terhadap kesiapsiagaan bencana gempa bumi di badan layanan umum daerah rumah sakit ibu dan anak pemerintah Aceh Tahun 2013. 2019:. Jurnal Ilmu Kebencanaan. 2015;2(2):2013015;2(2):37-46.

[4] Hidayati D. Kesiapsiagaan masyarakat: Paradigma baru pengelolaan bencana alam. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia. 2008;3(1):69–84.

[5] Argote L, Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process. 2000;82(1):150-169.

[6] Adiyoso W. Manajemen bencana: Pengantar dan isu-isu strategis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2018.

[7] Bagus L. Kamus filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia; 1996.

[8] Bock G, Zmud RW, Kim Y. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces and organizational climate. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 2005;29(1):67- 111.

[9] Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 1996;17:27-43.

[10] Ko DG, Kirsch LJ, King WR. Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 2005;29(1):59–85.

[11] Darr ED, Kurtzberg TR. An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2000;82(1):28–44.

[12] Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

[13] Wan J, Liu Q, Li D, Xu H. Research on knowledge transfer influencing factors in software process improvement. Journal of Software Engineering & Applications. 2010;3(2):134-140.

[14] Osterloh M, Frey BS. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science. 2000;11(5):538–50.

[15] Wibawanto H. Generasi Z dan pembelajaran di pendidikan tinggi. Simposium Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi; 2016 Sep 8; Bandung, Indonesia. Bandung, Indonesia: Institut Teknologi Bandung; 2016.

[16] Mannheim K. The problem of generations. Psychoanalytic Review. 1970;57(3):378– 404.

[17] Ryder NB, Westoff CF. Reproduction in the US, 1965. Vol 4910. United States: Princeton University Press; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400886517

[18] Oblinger D, Oblinger JL, Lippincott JK. Educating the next generation. New York: Brockport Bookshelf; 2005.

[19] Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed method research. Washington: SAGE Publishing; 2011.

[20] Priyono P. Studi keterkaitan antara ikatan sosial dengan pendapatan dan efisiensi ekonomi usaha ternak sapi potong di Kabupaten Banjarnegara [Doctoral dissertation]. Purwokerto: Universitas Jenderal Soedirman; 2008 [cited 2021 Jan 2].

[21] Tobing PL. Knowledge management: Konsep, arsitektur dan implementasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu; 2007.

[22] Kusuma GH. Metode transfer pengetahuan pada perusahaan keluarga di Indonesia. Modus. 2017;27(2), 125-139.