Published date: Oct 04 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR)

Pages: 550–562

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i15.12130

Sidik SunaryoFakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Shinta Ayu PurnamawatiFakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Endah LestariFakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

The most obvious shift in the order of interactions and values in social interactions after the reform era is the issue of appropriateness and appropriateness of values and interactions in family-household (private-domestic) affairs. However, after the reform era, the values and interactions in a family or household have been distorted by the state authorities into public affair and are no longer a private (domestic) affair. The fundamental problem of law enforcement lies in the conception of harmonizing the relationship of values. In the context of law enforcement related to domestic violence, the harmonization of the values that form the basis of the interaction system and the values that underlie a household with the values established in the formal state law, namely Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence. The basic problem that occurs is the misalignment of the implementation of legal politics, the values that are the basis of household building as stated in the PKDRT Law, do not originate from religious moral values. Meanwhile, all Indonesian citizens must be religious and believe in God Almighty.

Keywords: politics law, criminal violence, judicial perspective

[1] Kadafi B, et al. Restorative Justice for Young Offenders: An Analysis of the French Circular Confronting a European and National Legal Perspective. J. Law Jurisprud. 2018;17(1):5–12.

[2] Fitriana ZM, Maeyangsari D, Wahyudi E. Implementasi Prinsip Partisipatif dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa(Studi Kasus di Desa Jabung, KabupatenLamongan). J. Dedik. Huk. 2021;3(1).

[3] Darwis N. “Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi,” Membangun Polit. Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi-Tinjauan Status Dwi Kewarganegaraan Berdasarkan Undang. No. 12 Tahun 2006, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 30–31, 2006.

[4] Teitel RG. KeadilanTransisional: Sebuah Tinjauan Komprehensif (Diterjemahkan dari Transitional Justice). 2004.

[5] Raharjo T, Dkk. Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. 2019.

[6] Asshiddiqie J, Safa’at MA. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, no. Jakarta. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2016.

[7] Ingeborg Schwenzer MD. MODEL FAMILY CODE Series: European Family Law, First Edit. Intersentia, 2006.

[8] Budiarsih, “Tindak Pidana Khusus,”. Tindak Pidana Khusus. 2016;5931800(45):102.

[9] S. Bibas, The Machinery of Criminal Justice. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374681.001.0001..

[10] Jaishankar K. International Perspectives on Crime and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing; 2009.

[11] Purpura PP. Terrorism and homeland security: an introduction with applications (Google eBook). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2007.[Online], Available http://books.google.com/books?id=3ItzwLVo8DwC&pgis=1

[12] Jost K. “Criminal Law and Procedure,” in The Supreme Court A to Z, Seventh Ed., Boston, 2014, p. 586. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483300658.n93.

[13] Finkelman J, Dicey AV. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Univ Tor Law J. 1940;3(2):484.

[14] Charles WH, Packer HL. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Univ Tor Law J. 1970;20(1):109.