Published date: Oct 04 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR)

Pages: 492–505

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i15.12123

Nur Putri Hidayahnurputri@umm.ac.idFaculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Komariah .Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia

In a fiduciary guarantee agreement, both the fiduciary recipient and the fiduciary giver according to the fiduciary guarantee law are equally given legal protection. However, there are still weaknesses in legal protection for creditors, exacerbated by the practice of implementing fiduciary agreements in the field, among others in the form of not registering fiduciary objects (only stopping at making authentic deeds). Then, in the practice that occurs, the financial institution in entering into a financing agreement includes the words fiduciary guarantee. However, ironically, it is not made in a notarial deed and is not registered at the Fiduciary Registration Office to obtain a certificate. So, it is not surprising that due to such practice, cases of slow and difficult execution of fiduciaries are a problem. This research is to answer the question: the urgency of implementing strengthening legal protection for creditors in fiduciary guarantee agreements? To answer this problem, the author conducted normative legal research by looking at sociological conditions that occurred or were based on field facts. The results of this study indicate that a fiduciary guarantee that must be made with a Notary Deed, can provide legal protection if the process and procedures are following Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantee, and Fiduciary Guarantee was born since it was registered. In addition, in the practice of administering fiduciary guarantee agreements in Indonesia, legal protection efforts for creditors have not been fully implemented for fiduciary guarantee agreements. This is due to the juridical and non-juridical inhibiting factors in the form of inconsistencies between the mandates contained in the legal basis of fiduciary guarantees and the practices of their organizers.

Keywords: legal protection, creditors, fiduciary guarantee

[1] Tua Siagian M. EXECUTION ANALYSIS OF FIDUCIARY WARRANTIES REGISTERED | SCIENTIA JOURNAL : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa. Sci. J. 2021;4(2).

[2] Khairina N, Bustamam K. “PERJANJIAN DAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA.” J. Justisia J. Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sos. 2019 Dec;3(2):307–334. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v3i2.5935.

[3] Winarno J, Winarno J. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia. J. Indep. 2013 Jun;1(1):44–55.

[4] Novenanty WM. THE LEGAL ASPECT OF CREDIT WITHOUT COLLATERAL IN INDONESIA (ASPEK HUKUM KREDIT TANPA AGUNAN DI INDONESIA). Verit. Justitia. 2018 Jun;4(1):111–30.

[5] Asuan A. PENYELESAIAN DEBITUR WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT JAMINAN FIDUSIA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA. Solusi. 2018 Sep;16(3):253–65.

[6] Mahmud SI, Muhamad Nggilu N, Kasim NM. Menyoroti Kinerja Majelis Pengawas Daerah dalam Pengawasan Notaris di Gorontalo Utara. Indones. Law Reform J. 2021 Nov;1(3):368–83.

[7] Hidayat A, Husin S, Ulfanora U. Legal Protection for the Creditor as the Mortgage Holder for Granting Loan Using Collateral Land and Building Against Bad-Loan Debtor. Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst. 2019 Jul;6(3):766–74.

[8] Siwananda PG, Danyanthi APL. “JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG DIJAMINKAN OLEH PENERIMA FIDUSIA KEPADA PIHAK KETIGA Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum.” Kertha Semaya. 2018:6(8).

[9] Hukum P, Terhadap K, Carakata SP, Budhisulistyawati A. PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR TERHADAP OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA YANG TIDAK DIDAFTARKAN PADA KANTOR PENDAFTARAN FIDUSIA (Studi di Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Kantor Wilayah DIY). J. Priv. Law. 2019 Jul;7(2):295–300.

[10] S. Suyanti and S. B. Purwaningsih, “Weaknesses of Fidusia Execution After Rules of the Constituonal Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019,” Indones. J. Law Econ. Rev., vol. 9, no. 0, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2020.V9.693.

[11] T. Prasetya, S. Sanusi, and M. Jafar, “Akibat Hukum Pelanggaran Ketentuan Dalam Pendaftaran Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia,” J. IUS Kaji. Huk. dan Keadilan, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 495–505, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i3.666.

[12] Refri RR. Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Fidusia yang Dibuat dengan Akta Dibawah Tangan. Notaire. 2018 Jul;1(1):121–34.

[13] Martiawan F, Putra K. PENDAFTARAN ONLINE JAMINAN FIDUSIA SEBAGAI SUATU FASILITAS KREDIT DENGAN POTENSI LEMAHNYA PERLINDUNGAN KREDITOR. Perspektif. 2019 May;24(2):95–105.

[14] J. HALOMOAN. AKIBAT HUKUM BAGI KREDITOR TERHADAP AKTA FIDUSIA YANG TIDAK DIDAFTARKAN KE KANTOR PENDAFTARAN FIDUSIA JIKA DEBITOR WANPRESTASI (STUDI KASUS DI BPR BANK DANA WIRA BUANA). Notarius. 2013 Dec;4(1):50.

[15] C. H. Andari and N. F. Mediawati, “Legal Protection for Creditors Holding Fiduciary Guarantee Due to Debtor Default,” Indones. J. Law Econ. Rev., vol. 13, no. 0, p. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v13i0.738., Nov. 2021.

[16] depri liber sonata, “METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF DAN EMPIRIS: KARAKTERISTIK KHAS DARI METODE MENELITI HUKUM,” Fiat Justisia J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 8, no. 1, Nov. 2014.

[17] Okta M. Y.; Busyra, and W. Azheri Fauzi, “Strength of Fiduciary Deed in the Implementation of Bad Credit Execution by Financial Institutions,”. Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst. 2020 Jul;7(5):593–605.

[18] Soegianto S. D. S. R. S, and M. Junaidi, “EKSEKUSI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM KAJIAN UNDANG- UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA,”. J. Ius Const. 2019 Sep;4(2):207–19.

[19] Usman R. Makna Pengalihan Hak Kepemilikan Benda Objek Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dasar Kepercayaan. J. Huk. IUS QUIA IUSTUM. 2021 Mar;28(1):139–62.

[20] Tri C, Kristiyanti S. LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE PARTIES IN CREDIT AGREEMENT WITH FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE AFTER THE ISSUENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. NOTARIIL J. Kenotariatan. 2021 Dec;6(2):65–77.

[21] Usanti TP. LAHIRNYA HAK KEBENDAAN. Perspektif. 2012 Jan;17(1):44–53.

[22] Edsa Zahra F, Wiryani F. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemenang Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan atas Adanya Perlawanan Pihak Ketiga (Derden Verzet). Indones. Law Reform J. 2021 Jul;1(2):184–96.

[23] M. Yasir, “Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia,” SALAM J. Sos. dan Budaya Syar-i, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 75–92, Jun. 2016. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v3i1.3307.

[24] Cinthya K, Lestari D, Nyoman I, Budiartha P, Made N, Ujianti P. Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan. J. Analog. Huk. 2020 Nov;2(3):383–7.

[25] Sanusi, “LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE CREDITOR ON FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE OBJECTS UNLISTED IN THE FIDUCIARY REGISTRATION OFFICE,”. Int. J. Law Reconstr. 2017 Aug;1(1):74–86.