Published date: Oct 04 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR)

Pages: 124–137

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i15.12082

Sonya Claudia SiwuUniversity of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

Rofi Aulia Rahman:University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

The Covid-19 pandemic is interpreted by the President as a public health emergency (KEPPRES No. 12 of 2020). None of those declarations refers to either Article 12 or Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, although the situation (de facto) meets all the criteria of a state of emergency. On behalf of justice, normal law shall be applied in a normal situation, while in an abnormal situation, an abnormal law shall be applied. Regarding that issue, this paper investigates these three questions: i) why is the state of emergency not applied in the time of Covid-19? ii) how to measure the scale of the emergency of Covid-19 pandemic from the perspective of the state of emergency? iii) how should the law of the state of emergency in Indonesia overcome the situation in the future? These questions would be discussed on the level of legal philosophy using legal politics approach, statutory approach, conceptual approach, theoretical approach, and comparative approach. The main principle is solus populi suprema lex. It should be implemented properly. The results of this study indicate and explain that the state emergency law must adhere to the concept of people’s security is state security. In addition, state emergency laws must be anticipatory to new and very diverse developments and forms of danger.

Keywords: state of emergency, political legal dimension, future legal framework, legal reform

[1] Iyer V. States of emergency, the Indian experience. New Delhi, India: Butterworths; 2000.

[2] Crocker TP. Presidential Power and Constitutional Responsibility. Boston College Law Review. 2011;52(5):1552. https:lawdigitalcommons.bc.ed/bclr/vol52/iss5/1

[3] Arifin K. Government regulation in lieu of law on dangerous conditions. Jakarta; PSHTN FH UI; 1960. p. 54.

[4] Soekanto S. Introduction to normative legal research a brief overview. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada; 1995. p. 52.

[5] Marzuki PM. Legal research. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada, Media Group; 2005. p. 35.

[6] Sugono D. Indonesian dictionary. 4th ed. Sugiyono, Yeyen Maryani. Jakarta, Language Center of the Ministry of National Education. 2008. 1844 p. How are small businesses adjusting to COVID-19? Early evidence from a survey. Electron Journal. 2020;20(102):1–37.

[7] Asshiddiqie J. Emergency constitutional law. Jakarta: Public Library Gramedia; 2007. p. 307.

[8] Ferejohn J, Pasquino P. The law of the exception: A typology of emergency powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2004;2(2):215–217.

[9] Ginsburg T, Versteeg M. State of emergencies: Part I. Harvard Law Review. United State of America; 2020 April 17. https://blog.harvardlawreview.org/states-ofemergencies- part-i/

[10] Simamora JP. Multi-interpretation of the understanding of matters of emergencies that forces in issuing PERPPU. Journal of the Legal Pulpit. 2010;22(1):58.

[11] Ibnu Sina Chandranegara. Examination of PERPPU regarding constitutional authority disputes between state institutions, review of the constitutional court’s decision no. 138/PUU-VII/2009. Judicial Journal. 2012; 5(1):72

[12] Daniel P. Yusmic Foekh. Government regulation in lieu of lLaw (PERPU) A study from the perspective of normal constitutional law and emergency constitutional law. Dissertation. Jakarta: Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia. 2011. 338.

[13] Indah Amarita Sari. National security in international concepts and standards. National Security Journal. 2001;1(2):154.

[14] Barry Buzan. People, states, and fears. An agenda for international security studies in postcold war. Boulder. England: Lynne Rienner Publisher. 1983; 184.

[15] Mukhtar S. National security: Between theory and practice in Indonesia. Special edition. Sociae Polites; 2011. p. 128.

[16] Siwu SC. State emergency law in Indonesia. Dissertation. Faculty of Law Universitas Brawijaya. Poor. 2018.

[17] Riani S, Nurhasanah P, Afwa U. Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Direksi Induk Terhadap Risiko Bisnis Anak Perusahaan pada Holding Company BUMN. Indones. Law Reform Journal. 2021 Nov;1(3):303–317.

[18] Muhammadi F, Wulandari E, Susanto MH. Islamic triangle concept of marital age: Indonesian experience. Legality Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum. 2021 May;29(2):161–172.

[19] Kesadaran P et al. “Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum tentang Konsep dan Problematika Pelaksanaan Hukum Gadai.” Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum. 2021 Apr;1(1):58– 72.