Published date: Sep 28 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE)

Pages: 1103–1110

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i14.12060

Sofjan Aripinsofjan@ecampus.ut.ac.idUniversitas Terbuka, Indonesia

Rulinawaty RulinawatyUniversitas Terbuka, Indonesia

Syarif FadillahUniversitas Terbuka, Indonesia

D DarmantoUniversitas Terbuka, Indonesia

The policy tools for implementing services for citizens to increase capacity, competence, and qualifications through distance higher education (DHE) are widely accessible. It is however unclear which methods the Government uses and can use to implement these DHE policies operationally for citizens to immediately obtain the benefits. Furthermore, the opportunities for citizens to continue to higher education are limited, as evidenced by the low gross participation rate (APK). This rate is around 34.5% due to factors such as policymakers’ commitment, policy implementers’ ability, inequality of access, and public knowledge about DHE. Information technology is a tool for implementing distance education that has a substantial systemic and constructive impact on dedicated students. It also affects the continuity of the Government, the House of Representatives, and academics.

Keywords: policy implementation, distance higher education, information technology

[1] RistekDikti, “Penyelenggaraan pendidikan jarak jauh.,” Presented at the (2019).

[2] M. Hill and P. Hupe, Public Policy Analysis Dunn.

[3] M. Hill and P. Hupe, Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice. Sage, 2002.

[4] Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kennudayaan, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayan Republik Indonesia Nomor 109 Tahun 2013 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Jjarak Jauh Pada Pendidikan Tinggi., 2013.

[5] G.E. Gaiden, Administrative reform. Routledge, 2017.

[6] Rulinawati, “Studi Implementasi Kebijakan Publik.,” Kedai Aksara. p. 2013.

[7] G.C. EDWARD III, Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press, 1980.

[8] R. Van De Vord, “Distance students and online research: Promoting information literacy through media literacy.,” Internet and Higher Education. vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 170–175, 2010.

[9] J. Chen, N. Luo, Y. Liu, L. Liu, K. Zhang, and J. Kolodziej, “A hybrid intelligence-aided approach to affect-sensitive e-learning.,” Computing. vol. 98, no. 1–2, pp. 215–233, 2016.

[10] M.H. Huang and R.T. Rust, “Artificial Intelligence in Service.,” Journal of Service Research. vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155–172, 2018.

[11] A. Cam, M. Chui, and B. Hall, “Global AI Survey: AI proves its worth, but few scale impact.,” McKinsey. no. November, pp. 1–16, 2019.

[12] R. Boelens, B. De Wever, and M. Voet, “Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review.,” Educational Research Review. vol. 22, pp. 1–18, 2017.

[13] Y.A. Sheikh, Higher Education in India: Challenges and Opportunities. routledge, 2021.

[14] S. Wan and Z. Niu, “A hybrid e-learning recommendation approach based on learners’ influence propagation,.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 827–840, 2020.