Published date: Sep 28 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE)

Pages: 117–125

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i14.11959

Ida Dwijayantiidadwijayanti@upgris.ac.idUniversitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia

Aryo Andri NugrohoUniversitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia

Rizky Esti UtamiUniversitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia

This study analyzes the errors made by students when studying geometry and provides prevention strategies for prospective mathematics teachers. The method used in this study is a qualitative descriptive method. The instruments used were tests and interviews involving 16 prospective mathematics teacher respondents. Data were validated using the triangulation techniques by comparing answers based on test and interview results. The results of the research show the following conceptual errors made by the students: (i) while studying the concept of scale, it was seen that the writing of the scale can be expressed in the form of a fraction – the strategy to increase teacher’s TPACK ability is to ask students to analyze the difference between ½ and 1:2; (ii) errors in understanding the concept of a circle – the strategy to prevent this is to show a sample of a circular shape to the students; (ii) errors in distinguishing between the concepts of a circle and round – the strategy to prevent this is to remind students of the lyrics of the song “My hat is round” or the shape of the snack “tofu is round” and ask them to compare it with a ball; and (iv) limited understanding of the principle of the size of a triangle, namely the square of the longest side is less than the sum of the squares of the other sides – the strategy to prevent this is to ask students to analyze the patterns of pairs of sides. The novelty of this study not only analyzes the possible mistakes made by prospective teachers and students in teaching and studying geometry, respectively, but also provides an overview of the solution steps that teachers can take if their students face difficulty in learning geometry.

Keywords: TPACK, errors analyze, geometry

[1] Akturk AO, Ozturk HS. Teachers TPACK levels and students self-efficacy as predictors of students academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science. 2019;5(1):283–94.

[2] Biber C, Tuna A, Korkmas S. The mistake and misconceptions of the eight grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematic Education. 2013;1(2);50-59.

[3] Susanta B. Pembelajaran geometri di sekolah menengah dan permasalahannya. Universitas Sanata Dharma;Yogyakarta; 1999.

[4] Amalia SR. Analisis kesalahan berdasarkan prosedur newmann dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita ditinjau dari gaya kognitif mahasiswa. Aksioma. 2017;8:17–30.

[5] Purniati, T., and E. Sudihartinih. ”Visual Aids in Analytical Geometry Course in Conic Concept.” In Proocedings International Seminar on Mathematics, Science and Computer Science Education. 17 October 2015; Bandung - Indonesia

[6] Purbasari RJ, Kahfi MS, Yunus M. Pengembangan aplikasi android sebagai media pembelajaran matematika pada materi dimensi tiga untuk siswa SMA kelas X. Jurnal Online Universitas Negeri Malang. 2013; 1(1)1–11.

[7] Van de Walle JA. Matematika sekolah dasar dan menengah pengembangan pengajaran jilid 2. Erlangga - Jakarta; 2008.

[8] Ayuningsih R, Setyowati RD, Utami RE. Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah program linear berdasarkan teori kesalahan kastolan. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. 2020;2(6):510-18.

[9] Atiqoh KS. Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah pada materi pokok bangun ruang sisi datar. Algoritma Journal of Mathematics Education (AJME). 2019;1(1);63-73

[10] Dwijayanti I, Budayasa IK, Siswono TYE. Embodied cognition of the student mathematical imaginations in conceptual understanding of algebraic expression. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education of Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. 2018;3:682–86.

[11] Baya’a N, Daher W. The development of college instructors’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;174(2015):1166– 75.

[12] Khasanah M, Utami RE, Rasiman R. Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa SMA berdasarkan gender. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika. 2020;2(5):347–54.

[13] Dirgantoro KPS, Saragih MJ, Listiani T. Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa PGSD dalam menyelesaikan soal statistika penelitian pendidikan ditinjau dari prosedur Newman. JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education. 2019;2(2):83–96.

[14] Foulger T. Graphic assessment of TPACK instrument (GATI) as a professional development tool. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference; 2015; 1(1); 3157-3168.

[15] Sugiyono S. Metode peneliian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta - Bandung; 2014.

[16] Padmavathy R. Diagnostic of errors committed by 9th grade students in solving problems in geometry. International Journal for Research in Education (IJRE). 2015; 4(1)281-31.

[17] Suparno S. Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan Fisika. PT Grasindo - Medan; 2013.

[18] Napitupulu WR, Surya E. Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada ruang dimensi tiga ditinjau dari kecerdasan visual spasial siswa kelas X SMA. Jurnal Universitas Negeri Medan. 2018;1(1):1–8.