KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Four-Tier Thermodynamics Diagnostic Test (4T-TDT) to Identify Student Misconception

Published date: Sep 28 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE)

Pages: 106–116

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i14.11958

Authors:

Yoga Budi Bhaktibhaktiyoga.budi@gmail.com1Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

Irnin Agustina Dwi Astuti1Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

Rendi PrasetyaProgram StudiTeknik Informatka Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia

Abstract:

There are limited studies on the diagnosis of thermodynamics misconceptions using a four-tier instrument diagnostic test. Therefore, this identifies the misconceptions in thermodynamics material. The survey research was conducted on 577 students at SMAN in Semarang, Central Java. Students were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Identification of student misconceptions was done using the Four Tier Thermodynamics Diagnostic Test (4T-TDT). Students’ conceptual understanding was calculated using the percentage technique. The results of this study indicate that many students still have misconceptions about the concept of thermodynamics. The findings are expected to be a strategic step for designing appropriate remedial teaching.

Keywords: thermodynamics, misconception, four-tier diagnostic test, alternative conception

References:

[1] Ay Y. A review of research on the misconceptions in mathematics education. Education Research Highlights in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 2017;1(1):21–31.

[2] Akmam A, Anshari R, Amir H, Jalinus N, Amran A. Influence of learning strategy of cognitive conflict on student misconception in computational physics course. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018;335(1):1-7

[3] Fitri NL, Prahmana RCI. Misconception in fraction for seventh-grade students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1188(1):1-8

[4] Liu G, Fang N. Student misconceptions about force and acceleration in physics and engineering mechanics education. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2016;32(1):19–29.

[5] Saputra O, Setiawan A, Rusdiana D. Identification of student misconception about static fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1157(3):1-6

[6] Soeharto S. Implementation of text transformation in physics education to reduce students’ misconception. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning. 2016;1(2):56– 60.

[7] Neidorf T, Arora A, Erberber E, Tsokodayi Y, Mai T. Review of Research into Misconceptions and Misunderstandings in Physics and Mathematics. In: Student Misconceptions and Errors in Physics and Mathematics. IEA Research for Education, vol 9; 11–20.. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30188-0_2

[8] Sadler PM, Sonnert G. Understanding misconceptions: Teaching and learning in middle school physical science. American Educator. 2016;40(1):26–32.

[9] Üce M, Ceyhan İ. Misconception in chemistry education and practices to eliminate them: Literature analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2019;7(3):202– 8.

[10] Desstya A, Prasetyo ZK. Developing an instrument to detect science misconception of an elementary school teacher. International Journal of Instruction. 2019;12(3):201– 18.

[11] Sari DR, Ramdhani D, Surtikanti HK. Analysis of elementary school students’ misconception on force and movement concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1157(2):1-5

[12] Wijayanti MD, Raharjo SB, Saputro S, Mulyani S. Investigation to reduce students’ misconception in energy material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018;1013(1):1-6

[13] Tompo B, Ahmad A, Muris M. The development of discovery-inquiry learning model to reduce the science misconceptions of junior high school students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016;11[(12)]:5676–86.

[14] Yeh S-C, Huang J-Y, Yu H-C. Analysis of energy literacy and misconceptions of junior high students in Taiwan. Sustainability. 2017;9(3):1-29

[15] Ermawati FU, Anggrayni S, Isfara L. Misconception profile of students in senior high school iv Sidoarjo East Java in work and energy concepts and the causes evaluated using four-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1387(1);1-6

[16] Irawati RK, Sofianto EWN. The misconception analysis of natural science students on heat and temperature material using four tier test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1321(3):1-6

[17] Mubarak S, Yahdi Y. Identifying undergraduate students’ misconceptions in understanding acid base materials. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2020;9(2):276– 86.

[18] Widarti H, Permanasari A, Mulyani S. Undergraduate students’ misconception on acid-base and argentometric titrations: A challenge to implement multiple representation learning model with cognitive dissonance strategy. International Journal of Education. 2017;9(2):105–12.

[19] Kaltakci-Gurel D, Eryilmaz A, McDermott LC. Development and application of a fourtier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. ReseaRch in Science & Technological EducaTion. 2017;35(2):238–60.

[20] Sukarelawan MI, Jumadi J, Rahman NA. An analysis of graduate students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature (H&T) using three-tier diagnostic test. Indonesian Review of Physics. 2019;2(1):9–14.

[21] Champagne Queloz A, Klymkowsky MW, Stern E, Hafen E, Köhler K. Diagnostic of students’ misconceptions using the biological concepts instrument (BCI): A method for conducting an educational needs assessment. PloS One. 2017;12(5);1-13

[22] Dellantonio S, Pastore L. Ignorance, misconceptions and critical thinking. Synthese. 2021;198(8):7473–501.

[23] Aminudin AH, Kaniawati İ, Suhendi E, Samsudin A, Coştu B, Adimayuda R. Rasch analysis of multitier open-ended light-wave instrument (MOLWI): Developing and assessing second-years Sundanese-scholars alternative conceptions. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. 2019;7(3):557–79.

[24] Soeharto S, Csapó B, Sarimanah E, Dewi FI, Sabri T. A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2019;8(2):247–266.

[25] Admoko S, Yantidewi M, Oktafia R. The implementation of guided discovery learning using virtual lab simulation to reduce students’ misconception on mechanical wave. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1417(1):1-7

[26] Fenditasari K, Istiyono E. Identification of misconceptions on heat and temperature among physics education students using four-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1470(1):1-12

[27] Halim A, Lestari D. Identification of the causes of misconception on the concept of dynamic electricity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1280(5):1-6

[28] Tumanggor AMR, Kuswanto H, Ringo ES. Using four-tier diagnostic test instruments to detect physics teacher candidates’ misconceptions: Case of mechanical wave concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020;1440(1):1-8

[29] Yuberti Y, Suryani Y, Kurniawati I. Four-tier diagnostic test with certainty of response index to identify misconception in physics. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2020;3(2):245–53. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6061

[30] Atarés L, Canet MJ, Trujillo M, Benlloch-Dualde JV, Paricio Royo J, Fernandez-March A. Helping pregraduate students reach deep understanding of the second law of thermodynamics. Education Sciences. 2021;11(9):1-14

[31] Firetto CM, Van Meter PN, Kottmeyer AM, Turns SR, Litzinger TA. An extension of the thermodynamics conceptual reasoning inventory (TCRI): Measuring undergraduate students’ understanding of introductory thermodynamics concepts. International Journal of Science Education. 2021;43(15);1–22.

[32] Kamcharean C, Wattanakasiwich P. Development and application of thermodynamics diagnostic test to survey students’ understanding in thermal physics. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 2016;24(2);14-36.

[33] Liberatore MW, Morrish RM, Vestal CR. Effectiveness of just in time teaching on student achievement in an introductory thermodynamics course. Advances in Engineering Education. 2017;6(1):1-15.

[34] Purnama A, Lestari Y, Yennita Y, Fakhruddin F, Zulhelmi Z. Analysis of learning difficulties using the certainty of response index of thermodynamic material. Paperpresented at: Proceedings of the UR International Conference on Educational Sciences; Pekanbaru – Indonesia; 12 October 2019.

[35] Nurulwati N, Rahmadani A. Perbandingan hasil diagnostik miskonsepsi menggunakan threetier dan fourtier diagnostic test pada materi gerak lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education). 2019;7(2):101–10.

[36] Pujayanto P, Budiharti R, Radiyono Y et al. Developing four tier misconception diagnostic test about kinematics. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2018;37(2);237-249.

[37] Liu OL, Lee H-S, Linn MC. An investigation of explanation multiple-choice items in science assessment. Educational Assessment. 2011;16(3):164–84.

[38] Marisda DH, Handayani Y. The combination of interactive conceptual learning models and multimedia interactive to minimize misconceptions on the science content. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020;1572(1):1-7

[39] Hyslop-Margison EJ, Strobel J. Constructivism and education: Misunderstandings and pedagogical implications. The Teacher Educator. 2007;43(1):72–86.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

448 Abstract Views

341 PDF Downloads