Published date: Sep 28 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE)

Pages: 64–75

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i14.11954

Supandi .supandi@upgris.ac.idUniversitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia

Lilik AriyantoUniversitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia

Widya KusumaningsihUniversitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia

Mathematical literacy ability is important in the process of learning mathematics at schools. Efforts to improve mathematical literacy skills mostly involve providing materials and integrating learning with an ethnomathematical approach and higherorder thinking skills (HOTs) related to real life. The minimum competency assessment (AKM) is one of the ways to photograph students’ numeracy skills so that students can face and understand the flow of information. This study aims to design AKM tools for junior high school students in the city of Semarang, with a focus on mathematics. The study included the administrators of the association of mathematics teachers and all junior high school mathematics teachers in the city of Semarang. A large-scale focus-group discussion was created. The results show that the AKM design has a positive influence on teachers. Since teachers receive contextual information more quickly, the form of AKM questions becomes up to date. Students, on the other hand, are happy as the questions are presented in the form of stories. Thus, students’ mathematics learning ability increases, this is indicated by students being able to understand information from AKM questions.

Keywords: mathematical literacy, minimum competency assessment, HOTs

[1] Hedriana H, Soemarmo U. Penilaian pembelajaran matematika. Bandung: Refika Aditama; 2014

[2] Al-shammari ZN. Assessment of student learning outcomes: Indicators of assessment of student learning outcomes. International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation 2011; Spain; 14-16 November 2011.

[3] Muskin JA, Ibe. Student learning assessment and the curriculum: Issues and implications for policy, design and implementation. Current and Critical Issues in the Curriculum and Learning; 2015;1(1):1–29.

[4] Carmona G, Lesh RA. External assessment in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education; Springer; Switzerland; 2014.

[5] Nortvedt GA, Buchholtz N. Assessment in mathematics education: Responding to issues regarding methodology, policy, and equity. ZDM – Mathematics Education. 2018;50(4):555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0963-z

[6] E. Scotland. Changes to benchmarks numeracy and mathematics. Education Scotland, Scotland; 2017.

[7] Marwiang M, Junpeng P, Nakorn NN. The development of a model for mathematics classroom assessment: Collaborative assessment pyramid. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; 2014;143:764–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.459

[8] Cedefop. Application of learning outcomes approaches across Europe: A comparative study. Luxembourg: Luxembourg: Publications Office; 2016.

[9] Sary H, Hasratuddin H, Surya E. Effectiveness of development LKS based on international program for student assessment (PISA) with realistic learning for improving mathematical communication skills of student of MTsN 2 Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education; 2019;2(2):388–98. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v2i2.316

[10] Sulistyowati P, Setyaningrum L, Kumala FN, Hudha MN. Android-based monitoring applications of students’ learning outcomes. OP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; 2018;434(1);1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/434/1/012036

[11] Lile R, Bran C. The assessment of learning outcomes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; 2015;163;125–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.297

[12] Budi E, Setia M, Waluya SB, Ridlo S. Development of assessment instrument androidbased students’ interest in learning mathematics SMP with CPS Model. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; 2018;7(2):181–88.

[13] Fauziah F, Mardiyana D, Saputro DRS. Mathematics authentic assessment on statistics learning: The case for student mini projects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series; 2018;983(1);1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012123

[14] Issack SM, Hosany M, Gianeshwar R. A ME (mobile-elearning) adaptive architecture to support flexible learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology. 2006;3(1):19-28.

[15] Shibusawa S, Yonekura T, Niibori M, Kamata M. The mobile web-com e- learning system for mobile phones. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security; 2008;8(3):67-76.

[16] Lu M. Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2008;24(6):515-25.

[17] Taleb Z, Ahmadi A, Musavi M. The effect of m-learning on mathematics learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;171:83-89.

[18] Mamat K, Azmat F. The mobile learning application for basic router and switch configuration on the Android platform. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;90:235-44.

[19] Zaranis N, Kalogiannakis M, Papadakis S. Using mobile devices for teaching realistic mathematics in kindergarten education. Creative Education. 2013;4(7):1-10.

[20] West DM. Mobile learning: Transforming education, engaging students, and improving outcomes. Brookings policy report. Brookings; Washington; 2013.

[21] Singleton M. Going mobile with app inventor for android: A one-week computing workshop for K-12 teachers. Paper presented at: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on computer science education; March 6 - 9, 2013; Denver Colorado USA

[22] Wong GK. Engaging students using their own mobile devices for learning mathematics in classroom discourse: A case study in Hong Kong. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. 2014;8(2):143-65.

[23] Banavar MK, Rajan D, Strom A et al. Embedding android signal processing apps in a high school math class— An RET project. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE); 22-25 October 2014; Madrin - Spain

[24] Vakil S. A critical pedagogy approach for engaging urban youth in mobile app development in an after-school program. Equity & Excellence in Education. 2014;47(1):31-45.

[25] Astra IM, Nasbey H, Nugraha A. Development of an android application in the form of a simulation lab as learning media for senior high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 2015;11(5):1081-88.

[26] Zhang M, Trussell RP, Gallegos B, Asam RR. Using math apps for improving student learning: An exploratory study in an inclusive fourth-grade classroom. TechTrends. 2015;59(2):32-39.

[27] Judge S, Floyd K, Jeffs T. Using mobile media devices and apps to promote young children’s learning. Young children and families in the information age. Springer: Dordrecht; 2015.

[28] Larkin K, Calder N. Mathematics education and mobile technologies. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2016;28(1):1-7.

[29] Fabian K, Topping KJ, Barron IG. Mobile technology and mathematics: Effects on students’ attitudes, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Computers in Education. 2016;3(1):77-104.

[30] Sari S, Anjani R, Farida I, Ramdhani MA. Using android-based educational game for learning colloid material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017;895(1):1-6.

[31] Pratiwi P. Efek program pisa terhadap kurikulum di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan; 2019;4(1):51-71. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1157

[32] Harju-Luukkainen H, Vettenranta J, Ouakrim-Soivio N, Bernelius V. Differences between students’ PISA reading literacy scores and grading for mother tongue and literature at school: A geostatistical analysis of the Finnish PISA 2009 data. Education Inquiry. 2016;7(4); 463-479. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29413

[33] Wagner H, Hahn I, Schöps K, Ihme JM, Köller O. Are the tests scores of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) science tests comparable? An assessment of test equivalence in German schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2018;59:278– 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.09.002

[34] Dohn NB. Knowledge and skills for PISA - Assessing the assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2007;41(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9752.2007.00542.x

[35] Pusat asesmen dan pembelajaran, badan penelitian dan pengembangan dan perbukuan, kementrian pendidikan dan kebudayaan. Asesmen Nasional: Lembar Tanya Jawab; Jakarta; Indonesia. 2020.

[36] Ma’mun Z, Shalahudin I, Qiqi YZ. Policy analysis of implementation of minimum competency assessment as an effort to improve reading literacy of students in schools. Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan. 2021;11(1):83-91.

[37] Aifah F, Enur FDS, Babang R. Analisis pemahaman guru sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) mengenai asesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2021;3(4):1550–58.

[38] Anas M, Mochamad M, Sugiono S, Forijati R. Pengembangan kemampuan guru ekonomi di kediri melalui kegiatan pelatihan asesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM). Rengganis Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat. 2021;1(1):48-57. DOI