Published date: Sep 28 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE)

Pages:

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i14.11947

Husni Mubarokhusni@unisnu.ac.idUniversitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara.

Nina SofianaUniversitas Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Jepara.

This study discusses the planning, implementation, and assessment processes of English language teaching based on the national curriculum of Indonesia. Evaluative research was conducted using the CIPP model, which stands for context, input, process, and product. The subjects of this study were 30 English teachers from 15 schools in three municipalities in Central Java Province, Indonesia. Data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, and surveys. There are four variables in this research with six sub-variables (school policy, lesson plan, resources and learning facilities, media selection, teaching phases, and assessment). The results of the study show that learning English in both public and private schools has been going well at all levels. The authors recommend that while making a policy on English language teaching in Indonesia, two aspects must be considered – an English learning program based on the applicable curriculum and an extracurricular English learning program.

Keywords: English Language Teaching (ELT), national curriculum

[1] Haris A, Ghazali MI. Implementation of teacher learning in physical education curriculum at the junior school in Makassar Indonesia. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2016;1[1]:683–687. http://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.s1110

[2] Chamisijatin L, Suparto CYM, Sunaryo H, Eriyanti WR, Sugiyono J. Curriculum development (pengembangan kurikulum). Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti; 2010.

[3] Mcnulty B. Curriculum and assessment. Missouri: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education; 2013.

[4] Maba W, Bagus I, Mantra N. The primary school teachers’ competence in implementing the 2013 curriculum. SHS Web of C; France; EDP Science; 2018;.

[5] Natsir Y, Yusuf YQ, Nasution UF. The rise and fall of curriculum 2013: Insights on the attitude assessment from practicing teachers. SHS Web of Conferences; France; EDP Science;2018.

[6] Roza Y, Satria G, Siregar SN. The development of e-tutorial on implementation national curriculum 2013 for mathematics teacher the development of e-tutorial on implementation national curriculum 2013 for mathematics teacher. IOP Conference Series; Journal of Physics. 2017;1;1-7

[7] Ahmad D. Understanding the 2013 curriculum of English teaching through the teachers’ and policymakers’ perspectives. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Education Development (IJERED). 2014;2(4):6–15.

[8] Maba W. Teachers’ perception on the implementation of the assessment process in 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Sciences and Humanities. 2017;1[2]:1–9.

[9] Ahn VTK. Evaluation models in educational program: Strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Foreign Studies. 2018;34(2);140-150.

[10] Reswari GPA. Teaching English in the KTSP curriculum and 2013 curriculum simultaneously: A case study of a senior high school in Semarang Central Java Indonesia. Belfast: Queens’ University Belfast; 2018.

[11] Widodo HP. Language policy in practice: Reframing the English language curriculum. English Language Education Policy in Asia. 2016;1[11]:127–51. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0

[12] Hawanti S. Implementing Indonesia’s English language teaching policy in primary schools: The role of teachers’ knowledge and beliefs. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning. 2014;9[2]:162–170.

[13] Kemdikbud K. Silabus mata pelajaran bahasa inggris SMP/MTs. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI; 2016.

[14] Suyanto S. On school readiness - A reflection on the implementation of a new curriculum in Indonesia: A crucial problem on school readiness slamet Suyanto. AIP Conference Proceedings 1868, 100008 (2017); http://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995218

[15] Retnawati H, Hadi S, Nugraha AC. Vocational high school teachers’ difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction. 2016;9[1]:33–48.

[16] Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. New York: Routledge; 2007.

[17] Stufflebeam DL, Shinkfield AJ. Systematic evaluation. Boston: Kluwer Nijhof Publishing; 1985.

[18] Vidyawati N. An evaluation of English learning program in Muhammadiyah Junior High Schools Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University; 2019.

[19] Widoyoko EP. Penilaian hasil pembelajaran di sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2014. DOI