KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Negotiation Strategy to Persuade Students in an International Class

Published date: Jun 22 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 1st International Office Conference

Pages: 96-104

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i11.11329

Authors:

Riefki Fajar G.W.riefki.fajar.wiguna@uii.ac.idCulture and Learning Center, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Imam SahroniDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Abstract:

The word “persuasion” carries both good and bad connotations. Teaching as a form of persuasion needs strategies to persuade and negotiate with students. The negotiations are aimed at making students actively involved in the teaching and learning process. This article analyzes several persuasion strategies used in the classrooms to negotiate with students. For this purpose, the author observed the ESP (English for Specific Purposes) class for university students at International Program Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII). It was observed that during interpersonal communication between a teacher and students, the language used contained interpersonal function as the communication that aims to educate students has a lasting effect and also affects how well the students comprehend information or acquire the message. The persuasion that the teacher applies should consider several negotiation strategies. The study showed how certain acts of speech can influence students’ minds and drive their actions.

Keywords: negotiation, persuasion, classroom interaction

References:

[1] Philips SU. A comparison of Indian and Anglo communicative behavior in classroom interaction. Intercultural Discourse and Communication: The Essential Readings. 2005;4(16):291–303.


[2] Schultz K, Jones-Walker CE, Chaikkatur AP. Listening to students, negotiating beliefs: Preparing teachers for urban classrooms. Curriculum Inquiry. 2008;2(38):155–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00404.


[3] Kostogriz A, Peeler E. Professional identity and pedagogical space: Negotiating differences in teacher workplaces. Teacher Education. 2007;18(2):107–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210701325135


[4] Brown AV. Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. Modern Language Journal. 2009;93(1):46–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x


[5] Robin L. Persuasive discourse and ordinary conversation. Deborah T, editor. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press; 1982.


[6] H.P. G. Logic and conversation in pragmatics. Cole and M. New York: Academic Press; 1975. 41–58 p.


[7] Lewicki R, Barry B, Saunders D. Essentials of negotiation. 6th ed. New York: McGrawHill Education; 2015. p. 2–8.


[8] Levinson S. Living with Manny’s dangerous idea. Discourse Studies. 2006;7:431–53.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461445605054401


[9] Rank H. Persuasion analysis: A companion to composition. Illinois: CounterPropaganda Press; 1988.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

236 Abstract Views

234 PDF Downloads