KnE Social Sciences
ISSN: 2518-668X
The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.
Metaphors in Jason Mraz's Song Lyrics (An Ecolinguistic Perspective)
Published date: Jul 04 2022
Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences
Issue title: The 1st International Student Conference on Linguistics: Trends and Future Perspectives in Linguistics Study
Pages: 246-258
Authors:
Abstract:
This research was intended to analyze Metaphor in Jason Mraz’s song lyrics based on an Ecolinguistic perspective by Kovecess theory. The objective of this research was “To describe how metaphors delineation realized in Jason Mraz’s song lyrics based on the common source domain and the common target domain”. This research used a descriptive qualitative method. The researcher used the metaphor theory by Kovecess to analyze the data. The source of the data in this research was taken from Jason Mraz’s song lyrics such as The World as I See it, Back to the Earth, and Wise Woman. The data was collected through downloading, reading, classifying, coding, describing, and interpreting the data to get a complete conclusion of the Metaphor in Jason Mraz’s song lyrics based on an Ecolinguistic perspective. The researcher analyzed lyrics that show metaphor based on the common source domain and the common target domain in the lyrics. The result showed that the metaphor delineations were revealed from the analysis process by using the mapping common source domain and common target domain by Kovecess. The researcher found 19 Metaphors include the common source domain and the target domain. It showed the condition of the world that has a remarkable place, the beauty of ecology, our role as a part of nature. The three songs also convey an implicit message about how protecting and loving the environment create harmony and live peacefully because humans and nature have an interrelation.
Keywords: metaphor, ecolinguistics, kovecses, sog lyrics, source domain and target domain
References:
[1] Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2014.
[2] Dey I. Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge; 1993.
[3] Fill AAPM. The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology, and environment. New York: Continuum; 2001.
[4] Haugen E. The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment. New York: Continuum;2001.
[5] Kovcses Z. Metaphor. New York: Continuum; 2010.
[6] Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphor we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980.
[7] Mbete AM. Refleksi ringan tentang problematika keetnika dan kebahasaan dalam perspektif ekolinguistik. makalah seminar budaya etnik III. Medan: USU; 2009.
[8] Sidu N. Ekoleksikon ke-kaghati-an bahasa muna. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa. 2017;2(2):328-349. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.2.2.64.328-349
[9] Stibbe A. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology, and the stories we live by. New York: Routledge; 2015.