Published date: Jul 04 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 1st International Student Conference on Linguistics: Trends and Future Perspectives in Linguistics Study

Pages: 82-104

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i10.11277

Desak Made Icha Agustina Putriichadesak14@gmail.comMaster of Linguistics, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia

Aron Meko MbeteMaster of Linguistics, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia

I Nyoman MulianaMaster of Linguistics, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia

Mirsa UmiyatiMaster of Linguistics, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia

Ecolinguistics examines the whole nature of the relationship between language and the environment which is an expression of the entire reality of human life. GSB is an educational environment that preserves nature with the concept of local wisdom with a natural perspective. Lexicons derived from local, national, and global languages are widely used in naming buildings, academic activities, and daily activities. This study aimed to describe the ecolexicon and ecotext found in the bale sangkep in GSB. There were 2 research focuses, first, to describe the form, meaning, and grammatical categories of the ecolexicon; second, to describe the tridimensional ecotext social praxis found in the bale sangkep in GSB. The research was conducted with a descriptive approach with qualitative methods. Data collection is done through observation, documentation, and interview methods. The data were analyzed by applying the identity method and the distributional method. The results of the study showed that there are 89 lexicons related to the bale sangkep GSB. Lexicons are identified based on grammatical categories, meanings, and the existence of their environment. The total lexicons found were 69 lexicons which categorized as nouns consisted of 19 nouns in the form of basic words, 3 nouns in the form of derivatives, 1 noun which is a compound word, and 46 other noun lexicons in the form of noun phrases. Meanwhile, the other 20 lexicons were lexicons categorized as verbs, where 1 lexicon is a basic verb, and 19 lexicon is a derivative verb. The tridimensional of the ecotext were viewed from: the biological dimension, the speaker’s understanding of the physical entity of the lexicon; sociological dimension, the closeness of speakers through the use and way of implementing the lexicon entity; and ideological dimensions, collective relations, cognitive and psychological systems of speakers in the form of beliefs and beliefs about lexicon references. It can be concluded that this study reveals the richness of the lexicon in GSB as supporting data for ecolinguistics.

Keywords: ecolinguistics, ecolexicon, ecotext, Bale sangkep, grammatical category, social practice

[1] Alisjahbana. S Takdir. Arti bahasa, pikiran, dan kebudayaan dalam hubungan sumpah pemuda 1928. Jakarta: Ui-Press; 1979.

[2] Bang J, Door J. Eco linguistics - A framework. Odense: University of Odense; 1993.

[3] Lindo A. Vibeke., Bundsgaard J. The dialectics of ecological morphology-or the morphology of dialectics. Odense: University of Odense; 2000.

[4] de Saussure F. Pengantar linguistik umum. Hidayat RS, editor. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press; 1985.

[5] Door J, Bang C. Ecology, ethics, & commnunication: An essay in ecilinguistics. University of Odense; 2000.

[6] Fill A, Mühlhäusler P. The ecolinguistics reader. Language, Ecology and Environment. Language & Communication. 2004;24 (2). 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271- 5309(02)00015-0

[7] Halliday MA. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. 4th ed. London; Routledge; 2014.

[8] Haugen E. The ecology of language. Stanford; Stanford University; 1972.

[9] Keraf G. Tata bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta; Nusa Indah; 1984.

[10] Kridalaksana H. Kamus linguistik. Gramedia; 2001.

[11] Mbete A. Penuntun singkat penulisan proposal penelitian ekolinguistik. Denpasar; Vidia; 2014.

[12] Mbete AM. Ekolinguistik. Perspektif kelinguistikan prospektif. Denpasar; Universitas Udayana; 2009.

[13] Mbete AM. Masalah kebahasaan dalam kerangka pelestariannya: Perspektif ekolinguistik. Jurnal Tutur. 2015;1(2):181–188.

[14] Moloeng L. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung; PT. Remaja Rosdakarya; 2010.

[15] Nuzwaty. Pengenalan awal ekolinguistik. Medan; Sastra UISU Press; 2019.

[16] Quirk. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London; Longman; 1985.

[17] Rejistha IGNA. Beblabadan bahasa bali dalam perspektif ekolinguistik. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa. 2017;2(1):79-94. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.2.1.50.79-94

[18] Sudaryanto S. Metode linguistik. Yogyakarta; Gajah Mada University Press; 1992.

[19] Thompson G. Introducing functional grammar. 3rd ed. London; Routledge; 2001.

[20] Umiyati M. Ketahanan khazanah lingual pertanian guyub tutur bahasa bima dalam perspektif ekolinguistik kritis. International Seminar “Language Maintanance and Shift”. pp. 81-85. 2011.

[21] Verhaar JW. Pengantar linguistik. Yogyakarta; Gajah Mada University Press; 1998.

[22] Wardoyo IM. Kajian pendidikan agama hindu dalam tradisi sangkep krama adat pada anggarkasik di pura dalem banjar adat desa poh buleleng. Widyalaya: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 1 (2). 160-171; 2020.

[23] Widanti, T. (2014). Inilah Green School. Yayasan Kul-kul.

[24] Widanti, T. (2020). Khazanah Ekoleksikon “Green” di Green School Bali. Universitas Warmadewa.