Published date: May 20 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 3rd International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science (ICoGPASS)

Pages: 1158–1182

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i9.11010

Neneng Sri Rahayunenengsrirahayu@stialan.ac.idPoliteknik STIA LAN Jakarta

Alih Aji NugrohoPoliteknik STIA LAN Jakarta

Rima Ranintya YusufPoliteknik STIA LAN Jakarta

Indonesia produces and exports the most palm oil in the world. In practice, palm oil farmers are regarded as one of the most important contributors to the global palm oil industry chain’s trajectory. Farmers were actively involved in the Core-Plasma Plantation mechanism with the Member Primary Credit Cooperative (KKPA) scheme. However, putting this ideal picture into practice proved difficult, resulting in a slew of issues. Conflicts frequently arose as a result of the KKPA in Riau Province, home to Indonesia’s largest palm oil plantation. Community advocacy teams in three villages in Tambang District, Kampar Regency, informed the Regent about the polemics that occurred in the KPPA nucleus-plasma scheme involving village unit cooperatives, the community, and parent companies. The goal of this article was to investigate how the KKPA was implemented, and how it resulted in smallholders being excluded. This qualitative study relied on interviews with cooperative management, farmer groups, PTPN (a state-owned enterprise in the plantation sector) as the core company, plantation officers and farmers in Riau Province. The study was conducted from May to June 2021, and it revealed that the KKPA’s implementation was far from ideal. Farmers were excluded from the development of the palm oil industry. Parties’ rights and obligations were subject to asymmetrical information or bias. Farmers have lost control of their own land as a result of the size of the deduction from their harvest. The data on the debts and total instalments that have been paid must be made public so that the public is aware of the shortfall and timeframe.

Keywords: exclusion of palm oil smallholders, nucleus-people plantations, KKPA

[1] Agustira, M. A., Amalia, R., & Nurkhoiry, R. (2015). Program Sawit Untuk Rakyat ( Prowitra ) Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Produktivitas , Pemberdayaan , Keberlanjutan , Dan. Jurnal Penelitian Kelapa Sawit, 25(1), 315–324.

[2] Agustira MA, Amalia R, Nurkhoiry R. Palm oil program for the people (Prowitra) as an effort to increase productivity, empowerment, sustainability. Journal of Palm Oil Research. 2015;25(1):315–324.

[3] Ansel C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2007;18(4):543-571.

[4] Chalil D, Barus R, Khrisnamurti B. Indonesian palm oil smallholders in an inclusive global supply chain. Indonesia: ETFRN. 2018. Page 31-38.

[5] Figuerora NG. Stakeholders collaboration in community-based organizations (CBOs): The case of sanitation CBO working in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Finland: Aalto University; 2015.

[6] Horntvedt MET, Nordsteien A, Fermann T, Severinsson E. Strategies for teaching evidence-based practice in nursing education: A thematic literature review. BMC Medical Education. 2018;18(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909- 018-1278-z

[7] Li TM. Centering labor in the land grab debate. Journal of Peasant Studies. 2011;38(2):281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559009

[8] Liang C, Chang WS, Yao SN, King JT, Chen SA. Stimulating the imaginative capacities of agricultural extension students. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension [Iinternet]. 2016 [cited 2021 March 01] ;22(4):327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2015.1133434

[9] Nugroho, A. A. (2018). Ironi di Balik Kemewahan Industri Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit. Jurnal Pembangunan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 8(1), 24–30.

[10] No I. Exploring inclusive palm oil production. ETFRN: Wageningen, the Netherlands. 2019. ETFRN NEWS Issue No.59, April 2019.

[11] Pacheco, Gnych, Dermawan, Komarudin. Okarda. The palm oil global value chain: Implications for economic growth and social and environmental sustainability: Bogor, Indonesia; CIFOR. 2017. Working Paper 220.

[12] Rival A, Levang P. Palms of controversies: Palm oil and development challenges. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR; 2014. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/004860

[13] Sari, D. (2017). Evaluasi Program Kredit Koperasi Primer Anggota (KKPA) PT Perkebunan Nusantara V. Sosio E-Kons, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.30998/sosioekons.v9i1.1683

[14] Sheil D, Casson A. Meijaard E. et al. The impacts and opportunities of palm oil in Southeast Asia: What do we know and what do we need to know? Bogor, Indonesia; CIFOR. 2009. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/002792

[15] Zubir, Z., Petani, P., Sejarah, J., Ilmu, F., Universitas, B., Padang, A., Bulak, K., & Mada, U. G. (2016). PENGUASA, PENGUSAHA, DAN PETANI: Kapitalisme Perkebunan. Sawit, Distorsi Sosial Ekonomi, dan Perlawanan Petani di Indragiri Hulu, Riau, 1978– 2010.