Published date: May 20 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 3rd International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science (ICoGPASS)

Pages: 381–396

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i9.10952

Wahyu Nurdiansyah Nurdinwahyu.nurdiansyah28@gmail.comPolytechnic of STIA LAN Makassar

Rahmat RahmatPolytechnic of STIA LAN Makassar

Public sector innovation is currently a central issue in the provision of public services. One example is innovation in the licensing services sector, which has been carried out and assessed by a number of local governments with the aim of helping to improve the quality of public services and public welfare. This innovation is not going well and there are several things that have hindered its implementation. The purpose of this research was to identify and analyze the inhibiting factors of the innovation in public services program carried out by One Gate Integrated Service and Investment Agency. A qualitative approach was used. The data were obtained through observations, interviews, and document analysis. The results showed that a number of licensing services innovations carried out by the Pare-Pare City Investment and One Gate Integrated Service Office were hampered due to factors including: employees’ lack of skills in information technology and telecommunications, budget factors, lack of education and training, lack of incentives, and resistance of the relevant agencies towards the technical team.

Keywords: obstacles, innovation, public services, Pare-Pare

[1] Asropi, Asropi. Budaya inovasi dan reformasi birokrasi. Jurnal IlmuAdministrasi.2008;5(3):23-30.

[2] Fadel M. Reinventing local government: Pengalaman dari daerah. Jakarta: Gramedia; 2009.

[3] Martin J. Innovation strategies in Australian local government. Queensland University of Technology; Brisbane: Australia. 2000.

[4] Dwiyanto A. Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press; 2006.

[5] Hartley J. Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. CIPFA. Public Money Management. 2005;25(1):27–34.

[6] Neuman WL. Basic of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approach. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc; 2007.

[7] Salusu J. Pengambilan keputusan stratejik untuk organisasi publik dan organisasi non-profit. Jakarta: Grasindo; 2004.

[8] Mulgan G., and Albury, D. Innovation in the public sector. Admiralty Arch, The Mall, London SW1A 2WH, UK 2003.

[9] UNDESA. Innovations in governance and public administration: Replicating what works. New York: United Nations Publication; 2006.

[10] Robbins SP. Organizational behavior. 12th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2007.

[11] Akomofale CO. Managing innovations in educational system in Nigeria: A focus on creating and sustenance of culture of innovation. Journal Emerging Trends Educational Research Policy Study. 2011;2(1):4752.

[12] Behn RD. The adoption of innovation: The challenge of learning to adapt tacit knowledge. Washington DC.: Brookings Institution Press; 2008.

[13] Sumartono, Sumartono. Reformasi administrasi pelayanan publik. Malang: Naskah Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar FIA Unibraw; 2007.

[14] Borins S. Public management innovation: Toward a global perspective. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 2001;31(1):5– 21.