Published date: Mar 15 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 2021 Annual Conference of Indonesian Association for Public Administration

Pages: 610–622

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i5.10582

Aulia Suminar Ayuauliasumi@staff.uns.ac.idCommunication Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Novita HaryonoCommunication Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Andrine Prima Afneta ArzilCommunication Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Sri HastjarjoCommunication Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Widyantoro .Communication Department, Social and Political Sciences Faculty, Universitas Sebelas Maret

The interconnected world creates a post-truth society. Everyone stands for their truth, whether it has a strong basis in facts or not. The COVID-19 pandemic created uncertainty due to its novelty. Tempo is one of Indonesia’s media outlets and it is affiliated with the International Fact Checking Network, which is committed to promoting media literacy. This article aimed to conduct a framing analysis about how Tempo combats hoaxes about vaccines in Indonesia through its Instagram account. Data were collected from Tempo’s Instagram postings related to vaccines in Indonesia from January 2021 to September 2021 (n = 25). Gamson-Mogdialni’s framing analysis was used in this study. Aspects that were analysed in this framing analysis included metaphors, examples, catchphrases, depictions, visual images, roots, and appeals to principles. According to the results, most of the hoax information referred to health workers, the government, and conspiracy theories. Moreover, the results suggested that a fact checking system could provide a reference for mass media framing, which could increase public trust about an issue, especially COVID-19 vaccine safety.

Keywords: infodemic, fact-checking, post-truth, framing analysis, Instagram

[1] Zarocostas J. How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet. 2020;395(10225):676.

[2] Finset A, Bosworth H, Butow P, et al. Effective health communication – A key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient Education and Counseling. 2020;103(5):873.

[3] Henry R. Etymologia: Coronavirus. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2020;26(5):1027.

[4] Harb AM, Harb SM. Corona COVID-19 spread-a nonlinear modeling and simulation. Computers & Electrical Engineering. 2020; 88:106884.

[5] Quinn EK, Fazel SS, Peters CE. The Instagram infodemic: Cobranding of conspiracy theories, coronavirus disease 2019 and authority-questioning beliefs. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2021, 24.8: 573-577. [6] Purwaningtyas MPF. Ketidakpercayaan dan eskapisme kaum muda menghadapi paparaninformasi Covid-19. ETTISAL: Journal of Communication. 2021;5(2):161-182.

[7] Islam MS, Sarkar T, Khan SH, et al. COVID-19-related infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2020;103(4):1621–1629.

[8] Periksa fakta tempo.co diakui internasional fact-checking network dalam. Tempo.co; 2018 Aug 18. Available from: https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1118285/periksa-faktatempo- co-diakuiinternational-fact-checking-network

[9] Roy Roy Anda tengah menanti vaksin COVID-19? Jokowi: Sabar, saya juga dalam. CNBC Indonesia. 2021 Januari 7. Available from: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20210107115053-37-214138/anda-tengahmenanti- vaksin-covid-19-jokowi-sabar-saya-juga

[10] Barua Z, Barua S, Aktar S, Kabir N, Li M. Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science. 2020; 8:100119.

[11] Vardavas C, Odani S, Nikitara K, et al. Public perspective on the governmental response, communication and trust in the governmental decisions in mitigating COVID-19 early in the pandemic across the G7 countries. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2021;21:101252.

[12] Rakhmadani R. Objektivitas media di tengah pandemi Covid-19: Analisis isi berita tentang penerapan new normal di Indonesia pada media tirto.id. Jurnal Audiens. 2020;1(2):243-252.

[13] Eriyanto Eriyanto. Analisis framing: Konstruksi, ideologi, dan politik media. Yogyakarta: LKiS Yogyakarta; 2002.

[14] Sobur A. Analisis teks media: Suatu pengantar untuk analisis wacana, analisis semiotik, dan analisis framing. Bandung: Rosdakarya; 2001. [15] Imawan T. Media surabaya mengaburkan makna: Kasus pemilihan walikota. Surabaya: Pantau; 2000.

[16] Siahaan HM. Pers yang gamang: Studi pemberitaan jajak pendapat timor timur. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi Perubahan Sosial; 2001.

[17] Littlejohn SW, Foss KA. Encyclopedia of communication theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication; 2009.

[18] Foster S. Political communication. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2020.

[19] Brent RD, Stewart LP. Communication and human behavior. United States: Allyn & Bacon; 2006.

[20] Brown J, Gaudin P, Moran W. PR and communication in local government and public services. London: Kogan Page Publishers; 2013.

[21] Instruksi presiden nomor 9 tahun 2015 tentang pengelolaan komunikasi publik.

[22] Gamson WA, Modigliani A. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology. 1989;95(1):1-37.

[23] Graves L, Amazeen MA. Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.

[24] Hapsari DT. Inovasi jurnalis daring dalam kolaborasi tim cek fakta selama pemberitaan pilpres 2019. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. 2020; 9(1):51-63.

[25] Juditha C. Interaksi komunikasi hoax di media sosial serta antisipasinya. Jurnal Pekommas. 2018;3(1):31-44. [26] Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press; 1995.

[27] Arendt H. Crisis of the republic, lying in politics, civil disobedience on violence, thoughts on politics, and revolution. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1972.