Published date: Mar 15 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 2021 Annual Conference of Indonesian Association for Public Administration

Pages: 153–170

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i5.10547

Nanik Lestarinaniklestari100@mail.ugm.ac.idDepartment of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada

Yeremias T. KebanDepartment of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada

Bevaola KusumasariDepartment of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada

Ely SusantoDepartment of Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Universitas Gadjah Mada

This article aimed to review how the policy adoption process occurs based on published case studies, and explain the conceptualization of policy adoption, adding a theoretical overview to the conceptual definition. This study was conducted through a literature review. The researchers found 37 relevant articles to map the development of policy adoption. Qualitative descriptive analysis was used. Terms mapping was carried out using VoSviewer. Policy adoption was defined by general conceptualization. The findings showed that policy adoption is a part of the decision to choose policy alternatives after the policy formulation process. Mostly, the policy adoption process is influenced by internal and external determinants, often called policy diffusion. These determinants are each associated with elements that influence a government’s decision to adopt a policy.

Keywords: policy adoption, public policy, policy diffusion

[1] Berry FS, Berry WD. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review. 1990;84(2):395–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526

[2] Yi H, Feiock RC. Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Review of Policy Research. 2012;29(2):193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00548.x

[3] Walker JL. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. Princeton Readings in American Politics. 1969;1967:212–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1mjqv11.16

[4] Gray V. Competition, emulation, and policy innovation. New Perspectives on American Politics. 1994; 54(3):650–666

[5] Berry F, Berry W. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Sabatier P, editor. Boulder: Westview Press; 2007. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research

[6] Mooney CZ. Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly. 2001;54(1):103–24.

[7] Elliott RH. The policy adoption-implementation spiral. International Journal of Public Administration. 1981;3(1):113–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900698108524398

[8] Canon BC, Baum L. Patterns of adoption of tort law innovations: An application of diffusion theory to judicial doctrines. American Political Science Review. 1981;75(4):975–987. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962297

[9] Feiock RC, West JP. Testing competing explanations for policy adoption: Municipal solid waste recycling programs. Political Research Quarterly. 1993;46(2):399–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299304600211

[10] Ingle WK, Cohen-Vogel L, Hughes R. The public policy process among southeastern states: Elaborating theories of regional adoption and hold-out behavior. Policy Studies Journal. 2007;35(4):607–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00239.x

[11] Shipan CR, Volden C. The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52(4):840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x

[12] Matisoff DC. The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants? Review of Policy Research. 2008;25(6):527-546

[13] Pitt D. The impact of internal and external characteristics on the adoption of climate mitigation policies by us municipalities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. 2010;28(5):851–871. https://doi.org/10.1068/c09175

[14] Pitt D. Harnessing community energy: The keys to climate mitigation policy adoption in US municipalities. Local Environment. 2010;15(8):717–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.509388

[15] Nowlin MC. Theories of the policy process: State of the research and emerging trends. Policy Studies Journal. 2011;39(suppl.1):41–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541- 0072.2010.00389_4.x

[16] Wang R. Adopting local climate policies: What have California cities done and why? Urban Affairs Review. 2013;49(4):593–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412469348

[17] Fowler L, Breen J. The impact of political factors on states’ adoption of renewable portfolio standards. Electricity Journal. 2013;26(2):79–94.

[18] Massey E, Biesbroek R, Huitema D, Jordan A. Climate policy innovation: The adoption and diffusion of adaptation policies across Europe. Global Environmental Change. 2014;29:434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.002

[19] De Lancer Julnes P, Holzer M. Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Perform Meas Build Theory, Improv Pract Build Theory, Improv Pract. 2014;166–89

[20] Biesenbender S, Tosun J. Domestic politics and the diffusion of international policy innovations: How does accommodation happen?. Global Environmental Change. 2014;29:424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.001

[21] da Conceição RH, Börner J, Wunder S. Why were upscaled incentive programs for forest conservation adopted? Comparing policy choices in Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru. Ecosystem Services. 2015;16:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.004

[22] Bromley-Trujillo R, Butler JS, Poe J, Davis W. The spreading of innovation: State adoptions of energy and climate change policy. Review of Policy Research. 2016;33(5):544–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12189

[23] Fay DL, Wenger JB. The political structure of policy diffusion. Policy Studies Journal. 2016;44(3):349–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12122

[24] Marier P. The politics of policy adoption: A saga on the difficulties of enacting policy diffusion or transfer across industrialized countries. Policy Sciences. 2017;50(3):427– 448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9269-6

[25] Carley S, Nicholson-Crotty S, Miller CJ. Adoption, reinvention and amendment of renewable portfolio standards in the American states. Journal of Public Policy. 2017;37(4):431–458. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X15000379

[26] Boyer MA, Meinzer M, Bilich A. The climate adaptation imperative: Local choices targeting global problems?. Local Environment. 2017;22(1):67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1160372

[27] Mitchell JL. Does policy diffusion need space? Spatializing the dynamics of policy diffusion. Policy Studies Journal. 2018;46(2):424–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12226

[28] Fay DL. Moves and countermoves: Countermovement diffusion of state constitutional amendments. Policy Studies Journal. 2018;46(2):354–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12214

[29] Kalafatis SE. Comparing climate change policy adoption and its extension across areas of city policymaking. Policy Studies Journal. 2018;46(3):700–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12206

[30] Linkous E, Laurian L, Neely S. Why do counties adopt transfer of development rights programs? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2019;62(13):2352– 2374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1559044

[31] Le Mat MLJ, Altinyelken HK, Bos HMW, Volman MLL. Mechanisms of adopting and reformulating comprehensive sexuality education policy in Ethiopia. Journal of Education Policy. 2020;35(5):692–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1618918

[32] Yeganeh AJ, McCoy AP, Schenk T. Determinants of climate change policy adoption: A meta-analysis. Urban Climate.2020;31

[33] Ugyel L, Daugbjerg C. Successful policy transfer and public sector reform in developing countries. Policy and Politics. 2020;48(4):603–618. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15786631116992

[34] Burstein P. The determinants of public policy: What matters and how much. Policy Studies Journal. 2020;48(1):87–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12243

[35] Haupt W. How do local policy makers learn about climate change adaptation policies? Examining study visits as an instrument of policy learning in the European Union. Urban Affairs Review. 2020;0(0):1-33. doi:10.1177/1078087420938443

[36] Kavanagh MM, Parish K, Gupta S. Drivers of health policy adoption: A political economy of HIV treatment policy. Policy and Politics. 2021;49(3):343–368. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16108172938639

[37] Abel D. The diffusion of climate policies among German municipalities. Journal of Public Policy. 2021;41(1):111–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X19000199

[38] Adnane S. Economic Freedom and Women’s Emancipation in the MENA Region. Economic Affairs. 2015;35(3):416–27.

[39] Franzese Jr RJ. Electoral and partisan cycles in economic policies and outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science. 2002;5:369–421.

[40] Jordan A, Bauer MW, Green-Pedersen C. Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Polic. 2013;20(3):795-805.

[41] Cazals A, Sauquet A, Cazals A, Sauquet A. When does cooperation win and why ? E´tudes et Documents n?20. 2013.

[42] Holzinger K, Knill C. Cross-national policy convergence: Causes, concepts and empirical findings. Journal of European Public Policy. 2005;12:764–774.

[43] Holzinger K, Knill C, Sommerer T. Environmental policy convergence: The impact of international harmonization, transnational communication, and regulatory competition. International Organization. 2008;62:553–587.

[44] Magnani E. The environmental kuznets curve: Development path or policy result? Environmental Modelling and Software. 2001;16:157–165. [45] Gilardi F. Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science. 2010;6(1):1-17.

[46] Dobbin F, Simmons B, Garrett G. The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology. 2007;33:449–72.