Published date: Mar 15 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 2021 Annual Conference of Indonesian Association for Public Administration

Pages: 37–50

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i5.10538

Ririn Purbaririnpurba2@gmail.comThe Research Center And Development Of Social Welfare Services Yogyakarta-Social Ministry of Republic Indonesia

Chatarina RusmiyatiThe Research Center And Development Of Social Welfare Services Yogyakarta-Social Ministry of Republic Indonesia

Soetji AndariThe Research Center And Development Of Social Welfare Services Yogyakarta-Social Ministry of Republic Indonesia

Suryani SuryaniThe Research Center And Development Of Social Welfare Services Yogyakarta-Social Ministry of Republic Indonesia

Muh. Ulil AbsorThe Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta

The National Disaster Management Agency reported that 383 out of 514 districts/municipalities throughout Indonesia are prone to natural disasters. Social capital is seen as one of the community strengths in disaster mitigation strategies. This study examined the model of community-based disaster mitigation, the level of knowledge and the social capital of the communities in disaster-prone areas in Semarang Municipality and Situbondo District. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, interviewing 120 respondents. We found that men had better knowledge of disaster mitigation than women. The involvement of men in awareness-raising about disaster mitigation activities was also higher than women. As a result, women are more vulnerable during a disaster. This study also found a variation in community understanding regarding disaster mitigation and social capital in the two locations. Respondents in Semarang, which is an urban community, reported a lower level of knowledge on disaster mitigation and social capital. Respondents from Situbondo reported higher social capital in four dimensions, including trust, norms, values, and networks. The geographical location and culture likely explain the variation. This reflects that urban areas are more vulnerable than rural areas in disaster mitigation.

Keywords: community knowledge, disaster, mitigation, social capital

[1] Jati R. Sebanyak 2.925 bencana alam terjadi pada 2020 di tanah air, bencana hidrometeorologi mendominasi. 2020 Dec 29. Available from: https://www.bnpb.go.id/berita/sebanyak-2-925-bencana-alam-terjadi-pada-2020-ditanah- air-bencana-hidrometeorologi-mendominasi (accessed date 4 April 2021)

[2] Raharjo TE. Waspada dikala jeda (Mitigasi bencana gempa bumi di kota bengkulu). Yogyakarta: Citra Media; 2014.

[3] Putnam RD. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American of Prospect. 1993;13:35-42.

[4] Syahra R. Modal sosial: Konsep dan aplikasi. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya. 2003;5(1):1-22. DOI: 10.14203/jmb.v5i1.256

[5] Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology. 1988;94:95-120.

[6] Lin N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

[7] Hariadi U, Suratman S, Gunawan T, Arwan, A. Kearifan lokal komunitas sebagai modal sosial dalam manajemen bencana alam. Majalah Geografi Indonesia. 2019;33(2):1-8. DOI: 10.22146/mgi.48548

[8] Evendi Z, Sayuti RH, Pneumatica O. Modal sosial masyarakat pulau maringkik dalam menghadapi bencana. RESIPROKAL. 2021;3(1):1-21, DOI: 10.29303/resiprokal.v3i1.57

[9] Gadeng AN, Maryani E, Rohmat D. The value of local wisdom smong in tsunami disaster mitigation in Simeulue Regency, Aceh Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 145, The 1st UPI International Geography Seminar 2017, Bandung, Indonesia: 8 August 2017. Canada: IOP Publishing Ltd; 2018.

[10] Aldrich DP, Meyer MA. Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist. 2014;59(2):354-269, DOI: 10.1177/0002764214550299.

[11] Nuriana D, Rusyidi B, Ferdyansyah M. Mitigasi bencana berbasis sensitive gender. Share: Social Work Journal. 2020;9(2):179-194. DOI: 10.24198/share.v9i2.25562

[12] Husen AH, Suhardi S, Rahman I, Nur A. Pelatihan kesiapsiagaan dan mitigasi bencana anggota taruna siaga bencana (TAGANA) di kota tidore kepuluauan. Jurnal Pengamas. 2021;2(1):6-21. DOI:10.33387/pengamas.v3i1.1462

[13] Hayudityas B. Pentingnya penerapan pendidikan mitigasi bencana di sekolah untuk mengetahui kesiapsiagaan peserta didik. Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal. 2020;1(1):94- 102.

[14] Susanti E, Khotimah N. Partisipasi masyarakat dalam mitigasi bencana di kawasan rawan bencana iii gunung merapi desa mranggen. Geomedia: Majalah Ilmiah Dan Informasi Kegeografian. 2016;14(1):65-75. DOI: 10.21831/gm.v14i1.13778

[15] Lestari S, Nugraha AL, Firdaus HS. Pemetaan risiko tanah longsor kabupaten semarang berbasis sistem informasi geografis. Jurnal Geodesi Undip. 2019;8(1):160- 169.

[16] Nurbayani S, Utami L. Modal sosial berbasis kearifan lokal dalam mitigasi bencana. Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA). 2019;2(1):1-9, DOI: 10.32734/lwsa.v2i1.628

[17] Pranita E. Kenali 7 tanda angin puting beliung. Kompas.com. 2020 Sept 25. Available from: https://www.kompas.com/sains/read/2020/09/25/093100823/kenali- 7-tanda-datangnya-angin-puting-beliung?page=all (accessed date 7 July 2021)

[18] Rusy R, Fathy F. Modal sosial: Konsep, inklusivitas dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi. 2019;6(1):1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v6i1.47463