Published date: Mar 10 2022

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences

Pages: 134–134

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v7i4.10521

Lara Promnitz-Hayashil-hayashi@u-keiai.ac.jpKeiai University, Chiba, Japan

Covid-19 has changed education as we know it. What we thought would be a temporary challenge has turned into what feels like an endless one. In 2020, education systems around the world were thrown into what could easily be classified as ‘chaos’. Many countries have seen education sectors shut down completely due to non-existent infrastructure to provide classes outside the physical classroom. While this is understandable in less developed countries, insufficient emergency remote education infrastructure in advanced countries is extremely surprising and disappointing. Some countries have had success though and been able to deliver education in alternative ways. The spread of Covid-19 saw tertiary institutions across Japan turn to emergency online learning; however, many were not prepared for this. Institutions do not always have sufficient online resources, and educators and students alike may not have technological proficiency, which hinders the learning experience. 2021 has seen a continuation of the pandemic and while some Japanese universities have continued to present lessons either online or on-demand, many have returned to the physical classroom. Face-to-face classes are not the same as pre-Covid-19. While students may be more content to see their classmates and teachers, there are numerous challenges that arise which can still hinder not only the learning process, but also the social aspect in class, as there are strict protocols which need to be adhered to and teachers must adapt their lessons to accommodate these. This research will discuss the positive and negative aspects of online classes in 2020, and compare them to the return to face-to-face classes in 2021. A number of activities undertaken in both formats will also be discussed.

Keywords: education in the time of Covid-19, computer-assisted language learning, online teaching methodology

[1] Salim A, Azra A. Shari’a and politics in modern Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies; 2003.
[2] Salvatore A, Eickelman DF. Public Islam and the common good. Leiden: Brill. 2004;
[3] Munabari F. Islam in contention: Rethinking Islam and state in Indonesia. Ota, Atsushi, Masaaki, Okamoto, Suaedy A, editors. Kyoto, Taiwan, Jakarta: CSEAS Kyoto University, CAPAS Taiwan National University, The Wahid Institute; 2010. Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia: The rhetorical struggle for survival; p. 173–217.
[4] Munabari F. Reconciling sharia with “Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia”: The ideology and framing strategies of the Indonesian Forum of Islamic Society (FUI). International Area Studies Review. 2017;20(3):242–63.
[5] Munabari F. The quest for sharia in Indonesia: The mobilization strategy of the Forum of Islamic Society. Contemporary Islam. 2018;12(3):229–49.
[6] Munabari F, Larasati NU, Ihsan R, Nurhadiyanto L. Islamic revivalism in Indonesia: The caliphate, sharia, NKRI, democracy, and the nation-stateJurnal Politik. 2020;5(2):281– 312.
[7] Munabari F. Ideologi dan strategi gerakan filantropi Islam: Studi kasus hilal merah Indonesia. Sospol J Sos Polit. 2021;7(1).
[8] Kailani N. Forum Lingkar Pena and Muslim youth in contemporary Indonesia. Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs. 2012;46(1):33–53.
[9] Munafar LO. Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran. Yogyakarta: Gaul Fresh; 2018.
[10] Oberschall A. Social movements: Ideologies, interests, and identities. New York: Routledge; 2017.
[11] Gamson WA, Meyer DS. Comparative perspectives on social movements, political opportunities. McAdam D, McCarthy JD, Zald MN, editors. New York: Cambridge University Press...; 1996. Framing political opportunity; p. 275-90
[12] Tarrow S. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. https://doi.org/101017/cbo9780511813245
[13] Tilly C. Social movement: 1768–2004. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers; 2004.
[14] Boroujerdi M. Iran: political culture in the Islamic Republic. New York: Routledge; 1992. Gharbzadegi: The dominant intellectual discourse of pre and post- revolutionary Iran; p. 30–56.
[15] Wiktorowicz Q. Islamic activism: A social movement theory approach. Indiana University Press; 2004.
[16] Taji-Farouki S. A fundamental quest: Hizb al-Tahrir and the search for the Islamic caliphate. London: Grey Seal; 1996.
[17] McAdam D. Conceptual origins, current problems, et al. Comp Perspect Soc Movements. Cam-bridge Cambridge University Press; 1996.
[18] Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran berpandangan sempit? [Internet]. BBC News Indonesia; 2016 Aug 16. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah/2016/08/160815_trensosial_pacaran
[19] Hidayat R. Bisnis dan kontroversi gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran [Internet]. Tirto; 2018 May 28. Available from: https://tirto.id/bisnis-dan-kontroversi-gerakan- indonesia-tanpa-pacaran-cK25
[20]Adisya E. Gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran: Menikah solusi paling baik, jangan dipersulit [Internet]. Magdalene; 2018 Apr 3. Available from: https://magdalene.co/story/gerakan-indonesia-tanpa-pacaran-menikah-solusi- paling-baik-jangan-dipersulit
[21] Indonesia [Internet]. Available Tanpa Pacaran. Profil gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran; 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 19]. from: https://indonesiatanpapacaran.com/2017/01/21/profil- gerakanindonesiatanpapacaran
[22] Hefner RW. Civil Islam. Princeton University Press; 2011.
[23] Elson RE. Nationalism, Islam, ‘secularism’ and the state in contemporary Indonesia. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2010;64(3):328–43.
[24] Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. Syariah Islam dan kebijakan publik. Jakarta: HTI Press; 2006.
[25] Malia I. Eksklusif: Mengenal gagasan gerakan Indonesia Pacaran [Internet]. IDN Times; 2018 Apr 17. Available https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/indianamalia/eksklusif-mengenal- gagasan-gerakan-indonesia-tanpa-pacaran-1
[26] Munafar LO. Jangan dengar ceramah ka ode, dia dari [Internet]. Facebook; 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 20]. Available https://web.facebook.com/LaOdeMunafar/posts/723195544393414 Tanpa from: HTI from:
[27] Munafar LO. Sejak kelas 2 SMA, memang saya ngaji bersama Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) [Internet]. Facebook; 2014 [cited 2019 Nov 19]. Available from: https://web.facebook.com/LaOdeMunafar/posts/643387629040873
[28] Munafar LO. Menyambut muktamar khilafah dengan tema perubahan besar menuju khilafah [Internet]. Facebook; 2013 [cited 2019 Nov 17]. Available from: https://web.facebook.com/munafar.laode/posts/618588054837201
[29] Latouche S. The Westernization of the world: Significance, scope and limits of the drive towards global uniformity. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1996.
[30] Robertson R. Globalization: Social theory and global culture. 1992;16.
[31] Giddens A. The consequences of modernity. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
[32] Wiktorowicz Q. Radical Islam rising: Muslim extremism in the West. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2005.
[33] Ali. Ribuan pemuda hadiri talk show Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran di GOR asahan [Internet]. Dakwah Sumut; 2018 Aug 5. Available from: https://www.dakwahsumut.com/2018/08/ribuan-pemuda-hadiri-talk-show.html
[34] Haqq A. Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran, kampanye nikah dini dan masalah sosial kita [Internet]. Kompasiana; 2019 Jul 26. Available from: https: //www.kompasiana.com/amrul48335/5d3b16180d82301b04459935/indonesia- tanpa-pacaran-kampanye-nikah-dini-dan-problem-sosial-kita?page=all
[35] Asyari Y. Aksi tolak Valentine Day: Jangan tukar cokelat dengan kehormatan [Internet]. Jawa Pos; 2018 Feb 15. Available from: https://www.jawapos.com/jpg- today/15/02/2018/aksi-tolak-valentine-day-jangan-tukar-cokelat-dengan- kehormatan/
[36] Gunadha R. Sering sweeping, gerakan Indonesia Tanpa Pacaran resahkan warga depok [Internet]. Suara; 2019 Apr 20. Available from: https://www.suara.com/news/2019/04/20/213307/sering-sweeping-gerakan- indonesia-tanpa-pacaran-resahkan-warga-depok?page=all
[37] Osman MN. Reviving the caliphate in the Nusantara: Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia’s mobilization strategy and its impact in Indonesia. Terrorism and Political Violence . 2010;22(4):601–22.
[38] Wiktorowicz Q, Farouki ST. Islamic NGOs and Muslim politics: A case from Jordan. Third World Quarterly. 2000;21(4):685–99.