Published date: Apr 25 2022

Journal Title: KnE Medicine

Issue title: The International Online Seminar Series on Periodontology in conjunction with Scientific Seminar

Pages: 208-214

DOI: 10.18502/kme.v2i1.10853

Martin William Handokomartinwhandoko@gmail.comDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Vincensia Maria KarinaDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Background: Tooth mobility is a common problem in dentistry and usually occurs due to periodontitis. Mobile tooth can often be treated using dental splinting to avoid extraction. Fiber-reinforced composite is widely used to splint tooth, but it is difficult to be placed neatly and interferes mastication. Nowadays, fiber-reinforced splint is placed using silicone palatal index and planned using wax-up methods.

Objective: To illustrate the features and clinical applications of splinting fiber-reinforced composite using silicone palatal index.

Case Report: An elderly female with significant bone loss on the maxillary central incisor on left side was treated. A die cast was shaped and contoured using wax-up method to adjust a good occlusion with the opposite tooth. The silicone palatal index was made using clear polyvinyl siloxane above the wax-up. A fiber-reinforced splint was placed on the palatal surface of the maxillary anterior teeth from 11 to 23 using silicone palatal index.

Results: The silicone palatal index ensured predictable final contour and the position of fiber splint. This method provided promising results to achieve good occlusion and masticatory comfort.

Conclusion: Silicone palatal index represents a useful tool for fiber-reinforced splint on maxillary teeth in periodontally compromised patients. Planned occlusion are necessary to reduce trauma occlusion and risk of breakage.

Keywords: chronic periodontitis, intracoronal splint, fiber-reinforced composite, silicone palatal index

[1] Heier E, De Smit A, Wijgaerts A, Adriaens A. Periodontal implications of bonded versus removable retainers. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1997;81:607-616.

[2] Strassler HE, Serio FG. Stabilization of natural dentition in periodontal cases using adhesive restorative materials. Periodontal cases using adhesive restorative materials. Periodontal Insights. 1997;4:4-10.

[3] Artun J, Urbye, KS. The effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1988;93:143-148.

[4] Rubenstein BM. A direct bond maxillary retainer. Journal of Clinical Orthodonics. 1976:10:43-43.

[5] Kneilrim RW. Invisible lower cuspid to cuspid retainer. The Angle Orthodontist. 1973;43:218-219.

[6] Beam DR. Bonded orthodontic retainer: A review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995;81:207-213.

[7] Zachrison BU. Excellent in finishing. Journal of Clinical Orthodonics. 1986;20:460- 482.

[8] Zachrison BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Journal of Clinical Orthodonics. 1983;17:838-844.

[9] Zachrison BU. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer. Journal of Clinical Orthodonics. 1995;29:39-48.

[10] Artun J, Zachrisson BU. Improving the handling properties of a composite resin for direct bonding. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1982;81:269-276.

[11] Artun J. Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers.