Published date: Apr 05 2021

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: DonAgro: International Research Conference on Challenges and Advances in Farming, Food Manufacturing, Agricultural Research and Education

Pages: 611–621

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v0i0.8997

Igor PorsevKurgan State Agricultural Academy named after T.S. Maltsev, 641300 Kurgan region, Russia

Andrey Sozinov savrey@ya.ruKurgan State Agricultural Academy named after T.S. Maltsev, 641300 Kurgan region, Russia

Valentina PolovnikovaKurgan State Agricultural Academy named after T.S. Maltsev, 641300 Kurgan region, Russia

Anna VyunikKurgan State Agricultural Academy named after T.S. Maltsev, 641300 Kurgan region, Russia

This article presents the results of studying the phytosanitary situation in the cultivation of 10 varieties of green pea in the Trans-Urals. We noted that the economic threshold of harmfulness by the soilborne and leaf-and-stem disease agents was crossed in the majority of the varieties. All varieties of the peas were affected by root rot above the economic threshold of damage (15%). In 2018, the level of root rot development was 55.5% on average in the varieties, or an excess of EPR by 3.7 times; and in 2019, the development of rot was 44.6% or an excess of EPR by 3 times. High rates of Fusarium blight were evident in the Zauralskiy 4, Kulon, Krepysh, and Samarius varieties, and bacterial blight in the Krepysh and Tomas varieties. Rust development varied on average over the two years from 10.5% to 16.5%, and 12% of the standard cultivar Aksayskiy Usatii 55 was affected. 11% of Samarius 13% of Agrointel and 11.5% of Zauralskiy 3 were affected. For all varieties, the development of powdery mildew was below the economic threshold of harmfulness (EPV = 15%). A higher percentage of disease development was noted in the Zauralsky 4 variety (11.0%) and in the Yamalsky 305 variety (13.5%). The productivity of the seeds treated with chemical fungicide increased 1.2-1.9 times as compared to the reference sample. The productivity growth of the seeds treated with biofungicides amounted to 1.09-1.11 times the reference. The authors recommend a pre-sowing treatment of pea seeds with preparations of symbiotrophic nitrogen fixers (such as nitragin, rhizotorfin), combined with their treatment with microelements: ammonium molybdate with 50% content of the active ingredient (250 g / t of seeds) and boric acid (250-300 g / t of seeds). Keywords: green pea, varieties, diseases, fungicide, yield.This article presents the results of studying the phytosanitary situation in the cultivation of 10 varieties of green pea in the Trans-Urals. We noted that the economic threshold of harmfulness by the soilborne and leaf-and-stem disease agents was crossed in the majority of the varieties. All varieties of the peas were affected by root rot above the economic threshold of damage (15%). In 2018, the level of root rot development was 55.5% on average in the varieties, or an excess of EPR by 3.7 times; and in 2019, the development of rot was 44.6% or an excess of EPR by 3 times. High rates of Fusarium blight were evident in the Zauralskiy 4, Kulon, Krepysh, and Samarius varieties, and bacterial blight in the Krepysh and Tomas varieties. Rust development varied on average over the two years from 10.5% to 16.5%, and 12% of the standard cultivar Aksayskiy Usatii 55 was affected. 11% of Samarius 13% of Agrointel and 11.5% of Zauralskiy 3 were affected. For all varieties, the development of powdery mildew was below the economic threshold of harmfulness (EPV = 15%). A higher percentage of disease development was noted in the Zauralsky 4 variety (11.0%) and in the Yamalsky 305 variety (13.5%). The productivity of the seeds treated with chemical fungicide increased 1.2-1.9 times as compared to the reference sample. The productivity growth of the seeds treated with biofungicides amounted to 1.09-1.11 times the reference. The authors recommend a pre-sowing treatment of pea seeds with preparations of symbiotrophic nitrogen fixers (such as nitragin, rhizotorfin), combined with their treatment with microelements: ammonium molybdate with 50% content of the active ingredient (250 g / t of seeds) and boric acid (250-300 g / t of seeds).

Keywords: green pea, varieties, diseases, fungicide, yield

[1] Toropova, Y. Y., et al. (2019). Pea Root Rot Etiology in Forest Steppes of Western Siberia and Transurals. Vestnik of Kurgan SAA, vol. 3, issue 31, pp. 34-37.

[2] Gorobey, I. M. and Konyaeva, N. M. (2014). Diseases of Leguminous Crops and their Phytosanitary Control in Western Siberia. Novosibirsk: State Scientific Institution SibNSKhB Russian Agricultural Academy.

[3] Postovalov, A. A. (2018). The Impact of Mineral Fertilizers on the Phytosanitary Condition of the Pea Rhizosphere. Vesting of Kurgan SAA, vol. 1, issue 25, pp. 45-47.

[4] Cousin, R. (1997). Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Field Crops Research, vol. 53, issue 1–3, pp. 111-130.

[5] Gorobey, I. M., Ashmarina, L. F. and Konyayeva, N. M. (2011). Fusarium Blights of Grain Legumes in Forest Steppes of Western Siberia. Plant Protection and Quarantine, vol. 2, pp. 14-16.

[6] Kozyavina, K. N. (2015). The Impact of Root Rot Causing Agents on the Growth and Development of Underground Pea Seedlings. Russian Agricultural Science Review, vol. 6, issue 6-1, pp. 191-192.

[7] McDonald, G. K. and Peck, D. (2009). Effects of Crop Rotation, Residue Retention and Sowing Time on the Incidence and Survival of Ascochyta Blight and its Effect on Grain Yield of Field Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Field Crops Research, vol. 111, issue 1-2, pp. 11-21.

[8] Kirik, N. N. and Pikovskiy, M. I. (2006). Fungoid Diseases of the Pea. Plant Protection and Quarantine, vol. 6, pp. 46-49.

[9] Kotova, V. V. (2011). Vetch and Pea Root Rots and Protective Measures. St. Petersburg: VIZR.

[10] Chulkina, V. A., et al. (2007). Phytosanitary Optimization of Agroecosystems in Western Siberia. Plant Protection and Quarantine, vol. 1, pp. 14-19.

[11] Dospekhov, B. A. (1985). Methods for Field Experiments. Moscow: Agropromizdat.

[12] Ganopoulos, I., et al. (2018). Microsatellite Genotyping and Molecular Screening of Pea (Pisum Sativum L.) Germplasm with High-Resolution Melting Analysis for Resistance to Powdery Mildew. Plant Gene, vol. 15, pp. 1-5.

[13] Barilli, E., et al. (2009). Identification of Resistance to Uromyces pisi (Pers.) wint. in Pisum spp. Germplasm. Field Crops Research., vol. 114, issue 2, pp. 198-203.

[14] Le May, C., et al. (2009). Ascochyta Blight Development on a New Winter Pea Genotype Highly Reactive to Photoperiod Under Field Conditions. Field Crops Research, vol. 111, issue 1-2, pp. 32-38.

[15] Lecoeur, J. and Sinclair, T. R. (2001). Nitrogen Accumulation, Partitioning, and Nitrogen Harvest Index Increase During Seed Fill of Field Pea. Field Crops Research, vol. 71, issue 2, pp. 87-99