KnE Life Sciences

ISSN: 2413-0877

The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.

DNA Markers for Meat Quality of Pigs

Published date: Apr 05 2021

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: DonAgro: International Research Conference on Challenges and Advances in Farming, Food Manufacturing, Agricultural Research and Education

Pages: 361–373

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v0i0.8967

Authors:

Alexander Maksimov MaksimoVVV2014@mail.ruCandidate of agricultural sciences, associate professor of the department of breeding farm animals and zoohygiene named after academician P.E. Ladana, Federal State Budget Educational Institution “Don State Agrarian University”, Russia

Victor FedyukDoctor of agricultural sciences, professor of the department of breeding farm animals and zoohygiene named after academician P.E. Ladana, Federal State Budget Educational Institution “Don State Agrarian University”, Russia

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of determining genotypes of 3-breed pig hybrids (Landrace x Yorkshire x Duroc) by marker genes MC4R (melanocortin receptor-4 gene), IGF2 (insulinoid growth factor-2), POU1F1 (pituitary transcription factor), H-FABP (protein gene binding fatty acids), GH (growth hormone gene), LEP (leptin gene) and their interrelation with meat productivity. Allele frequencies for the studied genes were determined (MC4R: А = 0.58, G = 0.42; IGF2: Q = 0.96, q = 0.04; POU1F1: Е = 0.66, F = 0.34; H-FABP: D = 0.38, d = 0.62; GH: А = 0.26, G = 0.74; LEP: С = 0.27, Т = 0.73). The study showed that 3-breed hybrids did not have the highest level of heterozygosity in most allelic genes. MC4R (AG = 48%), POU1F1 (EF = 68%) and H-FABP (Dd = 52%) genes had the greatest number of heterozygotes; IGF2 (QQ = 92%), GH (GG = 58%) and LEP (TT = 56%) genes had the greatest number of homozygotes. The data showed that the breeds used to obtain three-breed hybrids were selected for analogous (meat quality) traits and that they had a higher frequency of the desired Q (IGF2), G (GH) and T (LEP) gene alleles, which were lost from hybrids in the homozygous condition. We identified the most desirable genotypes for the studied genes (GGMC4R, AGMC4R, QQIGF2, EFPOU1F1, DDH-FABP, AAGH, CTLEP) which are recommended for pig selection as well as for selection of parent pairs for producing commercial hybrids with high meat productivity.

Keywords: gene-dependent selection, slaughter and meat qualities of pigs, marker genes, MC4R, IGF2, POU1F1, H-FABP, GH, LEP

References:

[1] Bruun, C. S., et al. (2006). Evaluation of the Porcine Melanocortin 4 Receptor (MC4R) Gene as a Positional Candidate for a Fatness QTL in a Cross Between Landrace and Hampshire. Animal Genetics, vol. 37, issue 4, pp. 359-362.

[2] Getmantseva, L., et al. (2014). The Single and Combined Effect of MC4R and GH Genes on Productive Traits of Pigs. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, vol. 12, issue 1, pp. 28-32.

[3] Van Den Broeke, A., et al. (2015). An Invention Study Demonstrates Effects of MC4R Genotype on Boar Taint and Performances of Growing-Finishing Pigs. Journal of Animal Science, vol. 93, issue 3, pp. 934-43.

[4] Clark, D. L., et al. (2014). Effects of the Porcine igf2 intron 3-g3072a Mutation on Carcass Cutability, Meat Quality, and Bacon Processing. Journal of Animal Science, vol. 92, issue 12, pp. 5778-5788.

[5] Karpushkina, T. V., et al. (2016). Production Traits of LW Pigs Related IGF2 and CTSD Genotype. Achievements of Science and Technology AIC, vol. 30, issue 6, pp. 82-85.

[6] Getmantseva, L. V. (2012). Influence of MC4R, IGF2 and POU1F1 on Production Traits of Pigs. (Thesis for a Master’s degree in Agriculture, Persianovski Don State Agrarian University, 2012).

[7] Kostunina, O. V., Kramarenko, C. C. and Svezhentseva, N. A. (2015). IGF2 gene Association with Production Traits of LW Pigs (Sus Scrofa) with Regard to Sex Differentiation. Agricultural Biology, vol. 50, pp. 736-745.

[8] Kim, G. W., Yoo, J. Y. and Kim, H. Y. (2014). Association of Genotype of POU1F1 intron 1 with Carcass Characteristics in Crossbred Pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, vol. 56, art. num. 25

[9] Getmantseva, L., et al. (2017). Effect of Polymorphisms in Intron 1 of the Swine POU1F1 Gene on Growth and Reproductive Traits. Turkish Journal of Veterinary Animal Science, vol. 41, pp. 643-647.

[10] Tyra, M., et al. (2011). H-FABP and LEPR Gene Expression Profile in Skeletal Muscles and Liver During Ontogenesis in Various Breeds of Pigs. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, vol. 40, issue 3, pp. 147-154.

[11] Goncharenko, G. and Grishina, N. (2010). Production Traits of Pigs Evaluated Through the Use of Immunogenetic and DNA-markers. Chief Zoo Engineer, vol. 3, pp. 10-13.

[12] Polozyuk, O. N., et al. (2014). Gene Markers Influencing Production of Pigs. Swine Breeding, vol. 4, pp. 35-36.

[13] Maksimov, G., Maksimov, A. and Lenkova, N. (2015). DNA-genotyping on RYRI, ESR and H-FABP alleles and Meat Production of pigs. Chief Zoo Engineer, vol. 1, pp. 24-31.

[14] Bižienė, R., et al. (2011). Association between Growth Hormone Gene Polymorphism and Economic Traits in Pigs. VETERINARIJA IR ZOOTECHNIKA (Vet Med Zoot), vol. 56, issue 78, p. 27.

[15] Balatsky, V., Bankovska, I. and Ramona, N. (2016). Polymorphisms of the Porcine Cathepsins, Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone and Leptin Receptor Genes and their Association with Meat Quality Traits in Ukrainian Large White breed. Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 43, pp. 517–526.

[16] Liu, D., et al. (2011). Identification and Genetic Effects of a Novel Polymorphism in the Distal Promoter Region of Porcine Leptin Gene. Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 38, issue 3, pp. 2051-7.

[17] Pérez-Montarelo, D., et al. (2012). Joint Effects of Porcine Leptin and Leptin Receptor Polymorphisms on Productivity and Quality Traits. Animal Genetics, vol. 43, issue 6, pp. 805-809.

[18] Pérez-Montarelo, D., et al. (2013). Transcriptional Characterization of Porcine Leptin and Leptin Receptor Genes. PLoS One. vol. 8 (6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066398

[19] Petuchov, V. L., et al. (2007). Genetics: Textbook. (2nd ed.). Novosibirsk: NSTU Publishing, p. 628.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

383 Abstract Views

279 PDF Downloads