KnE Life Sciences

ISSN: 2413-0877

The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.

Concept of Productivity Levels in Modeling Sugar Beet Yields

Published date: Apr 05 2021

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: DonAgro: International Research Conference on Challenges and Advances in Farming, Food Manufacturing, Agricultural Research and Education

Pages: 161–171

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v0i0.8930

Authors:

Igor Fetyukhin f14091972@gmail.comDon State Agrarian University, Persianovsky, Russia

Aleksei AvdeenkoDon State Agrarian University, Persianovsky, Russia

Svetlana AvdeenkoDon State Agrarian University, Persianovsky, Russia

Natalia RiabtsevaDon State Agrarian University, Persianovsky, Russia

Abstract:

Various approaches have been used to model the productive potential of sugar beets under the conditions of unstable moistening of the steppe zone of Russia. This paper considers the general theoretical approach to the functional description of most of the processes of plant growth and development in ontogenesis, as well as of any organism, which is determined by the conversion of bioclimatic resources into the biological mass of plants. Through mathematical modeling, the potential productivity of sugar beets in the absence of limiting factors, with optimal provision of plant life factors, was determined. The second level of modeling sugar beet productivity was performed for the conditions of unstable moistening in the steppe zone of Russia, where soil moisture is a factor limiting the productivity of the crop. To predict productivity in conditions of moisture deficiency, the study used plant organs and soil processes as a model, since they determine the availability of water and nutrients for the plant root system. Given the practical applications of the data for real production conditions, the data obtained in the first and second levels of crop productivity modeling were compared with the actual yield data obtained empirically. The maximum rates of dry matter accumulation for the conditions of the steppe zone of Russia in the absence of limiting factors was not limited to the supply of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and could produce up to 16 t/ha of dry matter root crops. With a moisture deficit during the beginning of row closing (from the 45th to the 75th day of the growing season), there was almost no increase in the dry matter of the plant mass, which reduced the potential productivity of sugar beets by 50%.

Keywords: crop modeling, sugar beet, potential crop, photosynthesis, moisture supply

References:

[1] Gagarin, A. G. and Rogachev, A. F. (2018). Prediction of Yield Based on Analysis of Cross-Regional Data. News of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex, vol. 2, issue 50, pp. 339-346.

[2] Bukhovets, A. G., et al. (2016). Modern Approaches and Methods in Predicting the Yield of Certain Types of Crops. Voronezh: Voronezh State Agrarian University.

[3] Rakhmanov, S., et al. (2020). Econometric methods for solving problems of analysis and forecasting dynamics of yield of agricultural crops. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 614, issue 1

[4] Penning de Vries, F. V. T. and De Wit, K. T. (1986). System Analysis and Crop Growth Models: Modeling Crop Growth and Productivity. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat.

[5] Fetyukhin, I. V. and Litvinov, G. G. (2012). Theoretical and Empirical Estimation of Winter Rape Productivity in the Azov zone of the Rostov region. Bulletin of the Don State Agrarian University, vol. 1, pp. 32-37.

[6] Ignatiev, V. M. (2016). Simulation of Crop Yields. International Research Journal, vol. 2, issue 50, pp. 26-29.

[7] Panfilova, A. (2020). Modeling the impact of weather and climatic conditions and nutrition variants on the yield of spring barley varieties (Hordeum vulgare L.). Agronomy Research, vol. 18, issue 2, pp. 1388-1403.

[8] France, J. and Thornley, J. (1987). Mathematical Models in Agriculture. Moscow: Agropromizdat.

[9] De Wit, C. T. and Goudriaan, J. (1978) Simulation of Assimilation, Respiration and Transpiration of Crops. In Simulation Monograph. Wageningen: PUDOC.

[10] Schilling, G. (1987). Pflanzenernährung und Düngung. Teil II-Düngung. Berlin: Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag.

[11] Edwards, J. and Walker, D. (1986). Photosynthesis of C3 and C4 Plants: Mechanisms and Regulation. Moscow: Mir.

[12] Goodriaan, J. (1986). Processes that Determine Potential Productivity: Modeling Crop Growth and Productivity. Leningrad: Hydrometeoizdat.

[13] Tooming, X. G. (1967). The Relationship of Photosynthesis, Plant Growth and the Geometric Structure of Foliage of the Vegetation Cover with the Regime of Solar Radiation at Different Latitudes. Botanical Magazine, vol. 52, issue 5, pp. 606-616.

[14] Heldt, G.-V. (2014). Biochemistry of Plants. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy.

[15] Fedulov, Y. P. and Podushin, Y. V. (2019). Photosynthesis and Plant Respiration: A Training Manual. Krasnodar: KubSAU.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

313 Abstract Views

267 PDF Downloads