Published date: Mar 25 2021

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: The 2nd International Scientific Meeting on Public Health and Sports (ISMoPHS 2020)

Pages: 71–80

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v0i0.8869

Farah Paramitafarah.paramita.fik@um.ac.idDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Sport Science, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Yayuk HartriyantiDepartment of Health Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Susestyowati .Department of Health Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Luftan LazuardiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Hospital nutritional care requires a timely, accurate and complete information delivery to the patients. Some barriers found in the documentation process include incomplete documentation and errors in calculating patient’s nutritional needs. We developed NUCAPRO (NCP Electronic), a computer-based system, to document the nutritional care process and help dietitians in calculating a patient’s nutritional needs. This computer system was compared with a manual system to find out which of the two provided more accurate and complete documentation. This pre-experimental study used a pre–post-test design. Eight dietitians were recruited from the Internal Medicine Department Hospital in Malang to perform the documentation of the nutritional care of 40 diabetes mellitus patients. The documentation was performed using a manual system and NUCAPRO. The completeness and accuracy of documentation were compared between the two systems. Statistical analysis was done using McNemar. The results showed no difference in terms of completeness and accuracy of documentation between the two systems (p < 0.05). However, the error in calculation using NCP Electronic was found to be lower than the manual system. We suggest developing an alert feature for the system so that the process is more efficient.

Keywords: dietetics, documentation, medical informatic application, completeness, accurate, error

[1] Sitepu, Roslenni. (2005). Evaluasi Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit Di RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara.

[2] Riana, Apit. (2006). Evaluasi Kinerja Sistem Informasi Manajemen Ditinjau dari Aspek Persepsi Pengguna dalam Mendukung Proses Manajemen di Rumah Sakit PKU Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

[3] Lacey, K. and Pritchett, E. (2003). Nutrition Care Process and Model: ADA Adopts Road Map to Quality Care and Outcomes Management. Journal of the American Dietetic Association., vol. 103, issue 8, pp. 1061–72.

[4] Utami, Nanda Gita. (2011). Analisis Beban Kerja dan Kinerja Dietisien dalam Melaksanakan Nutrition Care Process di Ruang Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

[5] Skouroliakou, M., et al. (2009). The Development and Implementation of a Software Tool and its Effect on the Quality of Provided Clinical Nutritional Therapy in Hospitalized Patients. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association., vol. 16, issue 6, pp. 802–5.

[6] Molyneux, J. (2001). Interprofessional Teamworking: What Makes Teams Work Well? Journal of Interprofessional Care, vol. 15, issue 1, pp. 29–35.

[7] Lau, F., et al. (2010). A Review on Systematic Reviews of Health Information System Studies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association., vol. 17, issue 6, pp. 637–45.

[8] Rossi, M., Campbell, K. L. and Ferguson, M. (2014). Implementation of the Nutrition Care Process and International Dietetics and Nutrition Terminology in a Single-Center Hemodialysis Unit: Comparing Paper Vs Electronic Records. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics., vol. 114, issue 1, pp. 124–30.

[9] Boo, Y., et al. (2012). A Study of the Difference in Volume of Information in Chief Complaint and Present Illness between Electronic and Paper Medical Records. Health Information Management Journal., vol. 41, issue 1, pp. 11–6.

[10] Tang, P. C., Larosa, M. P. and Gorden, S. M. (1999). Use of Computer-Based Records, Completeness of Documentation, and Appropriateness of Documented Clinical Decisions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association., vol. 6, issue 3, pp. 245–51.

[11] Ekawati, M. E. (2012). Rekam Medis Elektronik Tidak Menjamin Kelengkapan Dokumentasi Kesehatan Pasien. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.

[12] Floor-Schreudering, A., et al. (2009). Documentation Quality in Community Pharmacy: Completeness of Electronic Patient Records after Patients’ First Visits. Ann. Pharmacother., vol. 43, issue 11, pp. 1787–94.

[13] Lazarus, R., et al. (2009). Electronic Support for Public Health: Validated Case Finding and Reporting for Notifiable Diseases Using Electronic Medical Data. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association., vol. 16, issue 1, pp. 18–24.

[14] Pringle, M., Ward, P. and Chilvers, C. (1995). Assessment of the Completeness and Accuracy of Computer Medical Records in Four Practices Committed to Recording Data on Computer. British Journal of General Practice., vol. 45, issue 399, pp. 537–41.

[15] Jang, J., et al. (2013). The Effects of an Electronic Medical Record on the Completeness of Documentation in the Anesthesia Record. International Journal of Medical Informatics., vol. 82, issue 8, pp. 702–7.

[16] Avidan, A. and Weissman, C. (2012). Record Completeness and Data Concordance in an Anesthesia Information Management System Using Context-Sensitive Mandatory Data-Entry Fields. International Journal Medical Informatics., vol. 81, issue 3, pp. 173–81.

[17] Skouroliakou, M., et al. (2005). Computer Assisted Total Parenteral Nutrition for Pre-Term and Sick Term Neonates. Pharmacy World and Science., vol. 27, issue 4, pp. 305–10.

[18] Lehmann, C. U., Conner, K. G. and Cox, J. M. (2004). Preventing Provider Errors: Online Total Parenteral Nutrition Calculator. Pediatrics, vol. 113, issue 4, pp. 748–53.