KnE Life Sciences

ISSN: 2413-0877

The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.

UTILIZING OF DARK MEAT TUNA FISH (Thunnus sp. ) AND TRASH FISH SURIMI IN THE PROCESSING OF FISH BURGER

Published date: Feb 01 2015

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: International Symposium on Aquatic Product Processing (ISAPPROSH) 2013

Pages: 53-62

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v1i0.86

Authors:

Fredy PattipeilohyDepartment of Fish Processing Technology Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Pattmura University, Ambon

Angcivioletta MoniharaponPeneliti Baristand Manado

Abstract:

Trash fish as by-catch includes a wide variety of species caught in shrimp fishing and usually is under utilizied while produced in a great number. Weakness of trash fish are small in measure with bone system, big husk and scale which resulting amount of yield flesh to be utilized relative small. So that, in processing a product require addition of order fish flesh. The objectives of this research were to study the amount of yield of minced fish that can utilizied for fish burger, quality and calory value of the product, and the level of panelists acceptance. Fish burger made from trash fish, used 2 (two) species as gulamah / Silver Pennah Croaker (Argyrosomus amoyensis), senangin / Fourfinger Threadfin (Elentheroma tetradactylum), and dark meat of Tuna (Thunnus sp). Minced fish of these two species was mixed with tuna flesh by ratio 1:1 (gulamah tuna) (A1), 1:2 (senangin tuna) (A2), 1:3 (gulamah tuna) (A3), 1:4 (senangin tuna) (A4), trash minced fish (gulamah senangin) (A5) and dark meat tuna minced fish (A6) as control. Research design applied was Complete Randomized Design with 4 replications. The result showed that amount of yield of minced fish are 47.8 % gulamah), 33.9 % (senangin) and 4.4 % (dark meat of tuna). The quality of fish burger products water content 46.00-53.93 %, protein content 12.78- 20.84%, fat content 12.83-19.52%, ash content 2.32-3.33%, and carbohydrate content 11.61- 17.36% (by-difference). Calory value 253.8-286.9 kcal. Sensory/orgaoleptic test value of this product is 7,04. 7,93 (aspire). Treatment of minced of gulamah mixed with tuna 1:3 (A3), the fish burger with the best quality as it was by indicated by the water content 50.22%, protein content 20.84% and fat content 12.83%.

Keywords : Dark meat tuna, trash fish, minced fish, amount of yield, fish burger 

References:

Arifudin, R. 1993. Fish Stick dan Fish Burger. Di dalam kumpulan Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Pasca Panen Perikanan. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perikanan. Badan Penelitian dan pengembangan Pertanian, Jakarta
Auliana, R., 2001. Gizi Dan Pengolahan Pangan. Adicita Karya Nusa.

Clucas I.J and A.R. Ward. 1996. Post-Harvest Fiheries Development: A Guide to Handling, Preservation, Processing and Quality, Cathham Maritime, Kent ME44TB, United Kingdom.

Desroiser, N.W. 1977. Teknologi Pengawetan Pangan. Penerjemah Mujoharto, M. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.
Fardiaz, D. 1985. Kamaboko, Produk Olahan Ikan yang Berpotensi Untuk Dikembangkan. Media Teknologi Pangan Vol. 1 (2) : 1-7.
Gaspersz, V. 1994. Metode Perancangan Percobaan Untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik, dan Biologi. Penerbit Armico Bandung.
Gaspersz, F.F., dan F. Pattipeilohy. 2011. Pengembangan Teknologi Surimi dan Diversifikasi Produk Olahan dengan Memanfaatkan Limbah Produksi Tuna Loin. Laporan Laporan Penelitian Hibah Penelitian Strategi Nasional. Universitas Pattimura. Ambon.
Grantham, G.J. 1981. Minced Fish Technology: A Review. FAO of the United Nations. Rome
Huda, N. 1994. Pengolahan Daging Lumat Ikan Laut Berukuran Kecil Menjadi Berbagai Jenis Tepung Ikan: Evaluasi Nilai Gizi dan Sifat Fungsional Protein. Tesis Program Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Huss, H.H. 1988. Fresh Fish Quality and Quality Changes. FAO/DANIDA. Training Manual; Roma FAO of the United Nations.
Ilyas, S., S. Nasran dan H.E. Irianto. 1988. Penelitian Pendahuluan Pengolahan Daging Lumat Ikan Pari (Trygon sephan). Jurnal Penelitian Pasca Panen Perikanan No. 60 : 39-46.
Miyake, Y.,Y. Hirasawa and M. Miyanebe, 1985. Technology of Manufacturing. Info Fish Marketing Digest. 5: 29-32.
Nasran, S dan P.R. Tambunan, 1974. Penelitian Pendahuluan Pemanfaatan Trash Fish. Dalam Laporan Penelitian Teknologi Perikanan No.2/1974. Jakarta.
Pattipeilohy, F. 2004. Pengolahan Bakso Ikan dengan Memanfaatkan Ikan Rucah. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional dan Kongres PATPI 2004, 17 – 18 Desember 2004, di Jakarta.
Setiabudi, E,. S. Bustaman dan D. Suryanto. 1984. Pemanfaatan Ikan Rucah dari Hasil Samping Pukat Jendela. LPTP No. 26/1984. Jakarta.
Sribhibhadh, A. 1985. Prospect in Developing on Production. In: Proceeding of the International Symposium on Engineered Seafood Including Surimi. R.E. Marthin (ed.). Collete R.L and National Fisheries Institute. Seattle. Washington DC.
Suparno dan A. Dwiponggo, 1993. Ikan-ikan yang Kurang Dimanfaatkan sebagai Bahan Bergizi Tinggi. Di dalam Prosiding Widyakarya Nasional Pangan dan Gizi V, 20 – 22 April 1993. LIPI Jakarta.
Suzuki T, 1981. Fish and Krill. Protein Processing Technology. Applied Science Publisher, Ltd. London.
Tanikawa, E. 1971. Marine Product In Japan. Technology and Research. Koseiha – Koseikaku Company, Tokyo.
Tan Sen Min; Ng Mui Chung, T. Fujimara, Hooi Kok Kuang and H. Hasegawa. 1987. Hand Book on the Processing of Frozen Surimi and Fish Jelly Product in South East Asia. MFRD/SEAFDEC. Singapore.
Wayne, D.N. 1989. Statistik Non Parametrik. Penerjemah Alex W Kontjoro. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.
Winarno. F.G. 1980, Kimia Pangan. PT. Gramedia. Jakarta.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

1246 Abstract Views

372 PDF Downloads