KnE Life Sciences

ISSN: 2413-0877

The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.

Biodiversity Conservation in Botanical Gardens: The Collection of Pinaceae Representatives in the Greenhouses of Peter the Great Botanical Garden (BIN RAN)

Published date: Nov 25 2019

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: International Scientific and Practical Conference “AgroSMART – Smart Solutions for Agriculture”

Pages: 851–859

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i14.5682

Authors:

E M Arnautovaarnaoutova@mail.ruDepartment of Botanical garden, BIN RAN, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

M A YaroslavcevaDepartment of Botanical garden, BIN RAN, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Abstract:

The work researches the role of botanical gardens in biodiversity conservation. It cites the total number of rare and endangered plants in the greenhouse collection of Peter the Great Botanical garden (BIN RAN). The greenhouse collection of Pinaceae representatives has been analysed, provided with a short description of family, genus and certain species, presented in the collection. The article highlights the importance of Pinaceae for various industries, decorative value of plants of this group, the worth of the pinaceous as having environment-improving properties. In the greenhouses there are 37 species of Pinaceae, of 7 geni, all species have a conservation status: CR – 2 species, EN – 3 species, VU- 3 species, NT – 4 species, LC – 25 species. For most species it is indicated what causes depletion. Most often it is the destruction of natural habitats, uncontrolled clearance, insect invasion and diseases.

References:

[1] Arnautova, E.M. (2010). Rare and threatened plants the worlds flora in the greenhouses of the Botanic garden of the Komarov Botanical Institute RAS. Botanical gardens. Problems of the introduction, vol. 274, pp. 61–63.

[2] Deborah, R.L. (2002). In situ genetic conservation of Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don), Information and recommendations. Report no. 26. Genetic Resources Conservation Program, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of California, pp. 29–36.

[3] Kabelchuk, B.I. (2013). Biodiversity. Stavropol: ARGUS, 157 p.

[4] Katsuki, K., Shimada, T., Yoshimaru, H. (2011). Process to extinction and genetic structure of a threatened Japanese conifer species, Picea koyamae. Journal of Forest Research, vol. 16, pp. 292–301.

[5] Kumar, R. (2015). Pinus gerardiana: ecology, regeneration and propagation. Saarbrucken, Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, 142 p.

[6] Mishra, T., Singh, B., Gill, P.K. (2015). Ectropis deodarae and fungal pathogen: A potential threat to Cedrus deodara in the Himalayan forestry. International Journal of Agricultural Science Research, vol. 4(7), pp. 146–149.

[7] Potter, K.M., Campbell, A.R., Josserand, S.A., Nelson, C.D., Jetton, R.M. (2017). Population isolation results in unexpectedly high differentiation in Carolina hemlock (Tsuga caroliniana), an imperiled southern Appalachian endemic conifer. Tree Genetics & Genomes, vol. 13(5), pp. 1–20.

[8] The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Retrieved from: http://www.iucnredlist.org.

[9] The Plant List. Retrieved from: http://www.theplantlist.org.

[10] Threatened Conifers of the World: Introduction. Retrieved from: http:// threatenedconifers.rbge.org.uk

[11] Wang, S., Xie, Y. (2004). China Species Red List, vol. 1 Red List. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press, 224 p.

Download
HTML
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

235 Abstract Views

367 PDF Downloads