Published date: Jan 01 2016

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: International conference on Agro-industry (ICoA) 2015

Pages: 55-60

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v3i3.408

Ibnu Wahid Fakhrudin Azizibnu.wahid@gmail.comDepartment of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Flora No.1 Bulaksumur 55281

The industrial sector in Bantul, Yogyakarta potential is still dominated by small industries. There are lack of synergy between many parties, both government and private sectors in developing and empowering small businesses making it difficult to achieve the goal of creating small businesses are resilient and competitive. Thus, the need for a study of alternative priority needs of small industries which results can be used as a reference in formulating policy of development of the small industry. This analysis is used to make decisions effective output over the decision making process. The main tools Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a functional hierarchy with the main input of human perception. By hierarchy, a complex and unstructured problems solved in their groups, and the groups are arranged into a hierarchy form. Small industries were chosen as research sample includes melinjo chips industry, rice crackers industry, bakery industry, peyek cracker industry, and snack food industry. Food industries are scattered in the district of Bantul, Yogyakarta Province. The result was two things: (1) the ineffectiveness of the direction of development; (2) the lack of a uniform indicators of success, because each agency builder seeks to pursue the goals and targets in accordance with the criteria that they have set themselves. Factors that influence the activity / operating a small food industry in order are processes, products, labor, and then raw materials. The need for an industrial to an alternative support is the cornerstone of determining the appropriate policy applied to each different industries. Priority factors in every industry are factors that influence the selection of alternatives that may need assistance in the form of training, equipment, technical, capital and then marketing.

Keywords: Analytical Hierarchy Process, Policy making, Small Scale Food industries 

Anonim. 2008. Bantul dalam Angka 2008. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bantul. Bantul
Djarwanto dan Pangestu Subagyo. 1990. Statistik Induktif. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
Erickson, B.H. dan T.A. Nosanchuk,. 1987. Memahami Data (Statistika untuk Ilmu Sosial). LP3ES. Jakarta
Forman, Ernest H. and Mary Ann Selly, 2001, Decision by Objectives.
Gaspersz, Vincent,. 1992. Analisis Sistem Terapan. Tarsito. Bandung
Mangkusubroto, K. dan C.L. Trisnadi. 1978. Analisa Keputusan : Pendekatan Sistem dalam Manajemen dan Proyek. Ganeca Exact. Bandung
Perwitasari, Yudita,. 1999. Upaya Pengembangan Industri Kecil Kerajinan Bambu Melalui Identifikasi FaktorFaktor Kelayakan Usaha. Skripsi. Jurusan TIP. FTP UGM. Yogyakarta.
Saaty, Thomas L,. 1986. Decisions Making for Leader : The Analitical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in A Complex World. RWS Publications. Pittsburgh.
Suryadi, Kadarsan dan Ramdhani Ali. 1998. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan : Suatu Wacana Idealisasi dan Implementasi Konsep Pengambilan Keputusan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung