Published date: Mar 10 2019

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: The UGM Annual Scientific Conference Life Sciences 2016

Pages: 326–332

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i11.3878

T A Kusumastutitriaksp@yahoo.co.id

R Widiati

S Nurtini

S Paramitasari Syahlani

M A Ummul Muzayyanah

Livestock manure is a potential for soil fertility and increases the income of farmers. This research is to identify characteristic farmers and utilization of manure and the factors that influence the choice of farmers in carrying out manure treatment. The research was conducted in Kulon Progo Regency as a production center Ettawa Crossbred goats and taken one location the Village Ngargosari Samigaluh District of implementing mixed farming crops and livestock. The numbers of the sample were 65 respondents. The survey method was used to collect data using questionnaires to respondents. The data were analyzed quantitatively using Binomial Logistic Regression models. The results showed that the views of characteristic respondent had productive age (48.75
yr), have similar primary school education (51.00 %), business experience (22.63 yr) and dominance in the on-farm jobs (80.00 %). Average livestock ownership as much as 4.88 goats or 0:55UT. Utilization of manure for plants was 89.00 % and the remaining 11.00 % for fertilizer plants and sold. A total of 70.80 % of farmers did not do a manure treatment through fermentation. The independent variable number of livestock is the most influential factor positive and significance of the choice of farmers in implementing waste treatment (P < 0.05), the age of farmers positive and significant (P < 0.1), and the number of family members negative and significant (P < 0.1). This is due in goat raising is still dominated household. The implication of this research is the need for
socialization understanding of the importance of manure treatment to improve the intangible benefits at the household of farmers.

Keywords: Fermentation, Intangible benefit, Ettawa crossbred, Income, Manure treatment

[1] Pirisi A, Lauret A, Dubeuf JP. Basic and incentive payments for goat and sheep milk in relation to quality. Small Ruminant Research 2007;68(1–2):167–178 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921448806002501


[2] Sodiq A, Tawfik ES. The Role and breeds, management systems, productivity and development strategies of goats in indonesia: A review. Journal.of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 2003;104 (1):71–89 https://www. jarts.info/index.php/jarts/article/view/19


[3] Mishima S, Leon A, Eguchi S, Shirato Y. Livestock waste, potential manure production and its use in Japan in 1980 and 2010. Compost Science and Utilization 2017; 25(1):43–52. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1065657X.2017.1362674?needAccess=true#aHR0cHM6 Ly93d3cudGFuZGZvbmxpbmUuY29tL2RvaS9wZGYvMTAuMTA4MC8xMDY1NjU3WC4yMDE3LjEzNjI2N zQ/bmVlZEFjY2Vzcz10cnVlQEBAMA==


[4] Nasiru A, Ismail N, Ibrahim MHI. Vermicomposting: Tool for sustanaible ruminant manure management. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Waste Management 2013; pp.1–7. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jwm/2013/732759/


[5] Budisatria IGS, Udo, H.M.J., Eilers, C.H.A.M., van der Zijpp, A.J. Dynamics of small ruminant production: a case study of Central Java. Indonesia. Outlook on Agriculture 2007;3(2):145–152 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 40104796_Dynamics_of_small_ruminant_production_A_case_study_of_Central_Java_Indonesia


[6] Ferichani M, The Potential of ettawa goat manure and urine management to support the productive and sustainable farming. Journal of Crop and Weed 2013;9(2):76–80 http://www.cropandweed.com/vol9issue2/pdf2005/13.pdf


[7] Suranindyah Y, Widi TSM, Sumadi, Tarmawati NH, Dwisepta U. Production Performance of Etawah Cross Bred Goats In Turi – Sleman. Yogyakarta. Paper presented in: 2009 The 1st International Seminar on Animal Industry. November 23–23, 2009. Bogor, Indonesia. p: 314–318 https://isai.ipb.ac.id/file/113/download?token=gy1p8SSz


[8] Orskov ER, Kustantinah A. Dairy goat milk and composition in socalled developing countries. Proceeding The 2nd Asian-Austrlasian Dairy Goat Conference. April 25–27, 2014. Bogor, Indonesia. p.37–38 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ghulam_Rafique2/publication/303840498_Pathological_Studies_of
_Caseous_Lymphadenitis_in_Small_Ruminants_Muhammad_Younus1_Ghulam_Mustafa_2_Muti_Ur_Rehman2
_Aftab_Anjum_3_Muhammad_Raza_Hameed1_Iahtasham_Khan1/links/575797a308ae5c6549042b5d/
Pathological-Studies-of-CaseousLymphadenitis-in-Small-Ruminants-Muhammad-Younus1-Ghulam-Mustafa-2-MutiUr-Rehman2-Aftab-Anjum-3-Muhammad-Raza-Hameed1-Iahtasham-Khan1.pdf


[9] Gujarati DN, Porter DC Basic econometrics. Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill Printed, Singapore; 2003. p. 595–614. https://isbnsearch.o,rg/isbn/9780073375779


[10] Mittelhammer,R.C, G.C.Judge, and D.J. Miller. Econometric foundations. First Published. Cambridge University Press; 2000. p.571–572. https://www.barnesandnoble. com/.../econometric foundations...mittelhammer/110095


[11] Guntoro B, Rakhman AN, Suranindyah YY. innovation adoption of dairy goat farmers in Yogyakarta. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research 2016;2(2):98–109 http://www.ijoear.com/Paper-February-2016/IJOEARJAN-2016-33.pdf


[12] Indarwati R, Herawati, Endang A. strategic planning to develop good dairy farming practices in smallholder dairy farms in Batu city, East Java. Jurnal Pembangunan dan Alam Lestari [Indonesian Journal of Environment and Sustanable Develpment] 2015; 6(2):163–170 http://jpal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jpal/article/view/202