KnE Life Sciences
ISSN: 2413-0877
The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.
Evaluating Quality of Work Life as Base of Working Condition Improvement Based on Participatory Ergonomic: Case Study on Workers in Small Industry of Gamelan XYZ at Bali, Indonesia
Published date: Jun 19 2018
Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences
Issue title: International Conference of Occupational Health and Safety (ICOHS 2017)
Pages: 372–383
Authors:
Abstract:
Small Industry of XYZ Gamelan in Bali Province is a heritage industry. Currently, the existence of small industry of Gamelan has become serious cause of attention for the local government; this makes the gamelan industry one of the interesting tourist objects in Bali. The demand of quality of life improvement of worker is a will of all
workers, but nevertheless, some cultures, local tradition, and the value of community life are becoming constraint to changing the local character. The objective of this research is to evaluate four domain qualities of life as base of initial information of working condition improvement based on user need (participatory ergonomic). The sampling technique used is non-probability sampling with accidental sampling design, that is, choosing sample based on immediacy of subject to population. A questionnaire was given to subjects based on inclusion criteria randomly. Data collection was done by parameter of quality of life questionnaire developed by WHO, that is, WHOQOL100, which contains 26 questions in total. It was a self-report questionnaire, where
subjects are requested to respond as conditions in 4 latest weeks. Data was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Result showed that the quality of life of workers in small industry on XYZ Gamelan at Bali Province on physical health domain has a score of 54, meaning good;psychological score of 44, meaning less social; relationship domain had a score of 75, meaning good; and environment domain 44, meaning less good. Since physical health and environmental domain had lowest scores, thus improvement that considering human as the main indicator is a must. Improvement could be conducted by redesigning work facility, work load adjustment, and worker performance, and evaluating worker and company productivity.
Keywords: quality of life, participatory ergonomic, physic, psychologic, social relationship, environment
References:
[1] William, W. B. and Keith, D. (1996). Human Resources and Personal Management (5th edition). Boston, USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[2] Sutikno, E. (2011). Relationship between family function and elderly’s life quality (Written in Indonesian). Indonesia Medical Journal, vol. 2, no. 1.
[3] Grandjean, E. and Kroemer. (2000). Fitting the Task to the Human—A Texbook of Occupational Ergonomics (5th edition). Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
[4] Manuaba, A. (2000). Occupational ergonomics, health, and safety (Written in Indonesian), in S. Wignyosoebroto and S. E. Wiranto (ed.) Ergonomics National Seminar Proceeding 2000, 1–4. Surabaya: Guna Widya.
[5] Grandjean, E. (1993). Fitting the Task to the Man (4th edition). London: Taylor & Francis.
[6] Manuaba, A. (2003). Ergonomics application with holistic approach is necessary, for more sustainable and excellent result (Written in Indonesian). Paper Presented at National Scientific Conference and Deliberation of the Occupational Safety and Health of Ergonomics. Jakarta: Sahid Hotel.
[7] Manuaba, A. (1999). The application of ergonomic participation in enhancing industry performance (Written in Indonesian). Paper Presented at Ergonomic National Seminar, Reevaluation of Ergonomics Application in Enhancing Industry Performance. Surabaya.
[8] Manuaba, A. (1998). The Application of Occupational Health of Ergonomics in Household (Written in Indonesian). Bunga Rampai Ergonomi. Denpasar: Work Ergonomics-Physiology Department of Universitas Udayana. 1: 38-48.
[9] Widyanti. A. (2011). Cultural ergonomics: Current development in ergonomics discipline (Written in Indonesian). Proceeding National Seminar ”Industrial Services”. Industrial Engineering Department, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Cilegon.
[10] Chaplanis, A. (1974). National and cultural variables in ergonomics. Ergonomics, vol. 17, pp. 153–175.
[11] Kroemer, K. H. E. (2009). Workload and stress, in Fitting the Human, Introduction to Ergonomics, 235–245. USA: Taylor and Francis.
[12] Manuaba, A. (2005). Total ergonomic enhancing productivity, product quality and customer satisfaction (Written in Indonesian). Paper Presented at National Seminar II The Quality Enhancement of Manufacture and Service System. Industrial Engineering Communication Forum, Yogyakarta.
[13] Manuaba, A. (2006). A total approach in ergonomics is a must to attain humane, competitive and sustainable work system and products, in Adiatmika and D. W. Putra (ed.) Proceeding Ergo Future 2006: International Symposium On Past, Present And Future Ergonomics, Occupational Safety and Health, 1–6. 28–30th August. Denpasar: Department of Physiology Udayana University- School of Medicine.
[14] Manuaba, A. (2003). Total ergonomic approach to enhance and harmonize the development of agriculture, tourism and small scale industry, with special reference to Bali. Dalam, in W. Purwanto, L. I. Sugema, and M. Ushada (ed.) Proceedings of the National Seminar on Ergonomics (Written in Indonesian). Yogyakarta: Indonesian Association of Ergonomics and Faculty of Agricultural Technology Universitas Gadjah Mada (h16-21).
[15] Sutjana, I. D. P. (1996). Improvement of working posture increase productivity of roof tile home industry workers at Darmasaba Village, Badung Regency. Journal Human Ergology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 62–65.
[16] Manuaba, A. (2004). Holistic ergonomics approach as a requirement in automation for achieving work process and humane, competitive and sustainable products (Written in Indonesian). Paper Presented at Ergonomics National Seminar, the Application of Ergonomics in Industry. Yogyakarta: Industrial Engineering Communication Forum Yogyakarta and Indonesia Ergonomics Association. 27 March.
[17] Kunz, N. C., Moran, C. J., and Kastelle, T. (2013). Conceptualising “coupling” for sustainability implementation in the industrial sector: A review of the field and projection of future research opportunities.
[18] Isahak, M., Loh, M. Y., and Susilowati, I. H. (2017). The association of workplace exposures on quality of life in small and medium enterprises workers: A crosssectional study in four ASEAN countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 315–327.
[19] Susilowati, I. H., Fitria, L., Low, W. Y., et al. (2017). Predictive factors for quality of life among small and medium enterprise workers in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Applied Science, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 116–125.