KnE Life Sciences
ISSN: 2413-0877
The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.
Community Perceptions on Conserving Watershed Areas
Published date: Mar 27 2024
Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences
Issue title: International Conference On Mathematics And Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Life Sciences
Pages: 301–308
Authors:
Abstract:
Conservation is one of the actions taken to maintain biodiversity and improve ecosystems. This study aimed to analyze the community’s view of conserving watersheds. The research method used is descriptive quantitative, involving the community as respondents to identify and analyze the proposed research instrument. Data were collected through a questionnaire, and community interaction data were collected through field observations and secondary data. The empirical data obtained was then analyzed and interpreted according to the research findings. The results of the research found that the community did not know much about conservation of biodiversity. Based on the community’s perception of conservation, it is necessary to emphasize to the community the importance of biodiversity as the basis for conservation to achieve disaster preparedness.
Keywords: conservation, biodiversity, ecosystem
References:
[1] Asdak C. Hidrologi dan pengelolaan daerah aliran sungai. 2020.
[2] Rahmawati D. Pengaruh aktivitas industri terhadap kualitas air sungai diwak di bergas kabupaten semarang dan upaya pengendalian pencemaran air Sungai. 2011.
[3] Anugrah N. Refleksi KLHK 2021: Capaian pemulihan daerah aliran sungai dan rehabilitasi hutan. 2021.
[4] Berkes F. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007 Sep;104(39):15188–93.
[5] Fisher RJ. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res. 1993;20(September):303–15.
[6] Bennett NJ. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):582–92.
[7] Abuzinada AH. The role of protected areas in conserving biological diversity in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Arid Environ. 2003;54(1):39–45.
[8] Martín-López B, Montes C, Ramírez L, Benayas J. What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biol Conserv. 2009;142(7):1370–80.
[9] Bowen-Jones E, Entwistle A. Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and local contexts. Oryx. 2002;36(2):189–95.
[10] Messalina L. Salampessy, Aisyah, and Indra G Febryano, “Persepsi masyarakat terhadap pengelolaan sumberdaya alam di daerah aliran sungai.” [ANR]. Talenta Conference Series: Agricultural and Natural Resources. 2019;2(1):11–7.
[11] Sukmadinata NS. Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya; 2005.
[12] Susanto I. Konservasi wilayah daerah aliran sungai (das) guna mendukung pembangunan wilayah das berkelanjutan.
[13] Tunas IG. Prediksi erosi lahan das bengkulu dengan Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG). SMARTek. 2005;3:137–45.
[14] Edriani AF. Analisis tingkat erosi dan kekritisan lahan menggunakan sistem informasi geografis di Sub DAS Bengkulu Hilir DAS Air Bengkulu. 2014.
[15] Lee HF, Zhang DD. Perceiving the environment from the lay perspective in desertified areas, northern China. Environ Manage. 2008 Feb;41(2):168–82.
[16] Ormsby A, Kaplin BA. A framework for understanding community resident perceptions of Masoala National Park, Madagascar. Environ Conserv. 2005;32(2):156–64.
[17] Mcclanahan T, Davies J, Maina J. Factors influencing resource users and managers’ perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. Environ Conserv. 2005;32(1):42–9.
[18] Bauer H. Local perceptions of Waza National Park, Northern Cameroon. Environ Conserv. 2003;30(2):175–81.
[19] Gillingham S, Lee PC. The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the selous game reserve, Tanzania. Environ Conserv. 1999;26(3):218–28.
[20] Mehta JN, Kellert SR. Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun conservation area. Environ Conserv. 1998;25(4):320–33.
[21] Ekawati S, Paimin P, Purwanto P, Donie S. Monitoring dan evaluasi kondisi sosial ekonomi dalam pengelolaan daerah aliran sungai: studi kasus di sub das progo hulu. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan. 2005;2(2):207–214.