KnE Life Sciences
ISSN: 2413-0877
The latest conference proceedings on life sciences, medicine and pharmacology.
The Effectiveness of the Organic Fertilizer Formula of the PGPR and Biocontrol Agents Consortium on the Growth of Leeks and Reduction of Soft Rot Disease
Published date: Jun 07 2022
Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences
Issue title: The First Asian PGPR Indonesian Chapter International e-Conference 2021
Pages: 193–205
Authors:
Abstract:
The growing demand for organic leeks (Allium fistulosum L.) in the lowlands necessitates the introduction of organic fertilizers and disease-controlling biological agents. Erwinia sp. causes soft rot disease, which results in the loss of 12-40% of the plant’s weight. Because soil-infected pathogens are difficult to control, biological agents that live in the same niche as pathogenic bacteria are used to combat them. This study chose to examine Streptomyces sp. isolate CS1 and Trichoderma viride isolate TTA1 for their potential antagonistic abilities against Erwinia sp. Organic fertilizers and biological agents can be combined in a single-use formulation for maximum efficiency. The study’s primary objective was to see how effective the decomposer microbial consortium’s organic fertilizer formula and biological agents were at promoting leek growth and reducing soft rot disease. The five treatments used in the study were B0 (no pathogen control), B1 (PGPR consortium organic fertilizer = BIOMEG), B2 (BIOMEG + Streptomyces), B3 (BIOMEG + Trichoderma), and B4 (BIOMEG + Streptomyces + Trichoderma). Each experiment was carried out five times. The consortium fertilizer was made in the following manner: the organic matter was fermented for four weeks with a suspension of Bacillus megatrium, Bacillus ap., Pseudomonas sp., and Aspergillus niger, then for two weeks with a suspension of Streptomyces-CS1 and Trichoderma viride-TTA1. The leek seedlings were inoculated with E. caratovora and planted in a 1:4 mixture of consortium fertilizer and soil. The use of biological agents and the PGPR microbial consortium organic fertilizer formula reduced the incidence of soft rot disease in leeks better than the use of the PGPR microbial consortium organic fertilizer formula alone. The organic fertilizer formula of the microbial consortium PGPR + Streptomyces + Trichoderma produced the best results in terms of disease reduction and leek yield.
Keywords: Organic-fertilizer, PGPR, Leeks, Softrot-diseases
References:
[1] Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia. Productivity of horticulture sub-sector. Pertanian.go; November 23th, 2021. Available from: https://www.pertanian.go.id/home/?show=page&act=view&id=61
[2] Sutrisna N, Ishaq I, Suwalan S. Kajian rakitan teknologi budidaya bawang daun (Allium fistulosum L) pada lahan dataran tinggi di bandung, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian. 2003;6(1):64-72.
[3] Indonesia Centre for Horticultural Research & Development. Leeks Cultivation. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hortikultura. Indonesia Centre for Horticulture Research and Development publisher. Bogor; 2021. Available from: http://hortikultura.litbang.pertanian.go.id/teknologi-detail-41.html
[4] Cother EJ, Dowling V. Bacteria associated with internal breakdown of onion bulbs and their possible role in disease expression. Plant Pathology 1986;35:329-336.
[5] Watson RW, Hale CN. Bacteria associated with onion bulb spoilage. New Zealand Journal Experimental Agriculture 1984;12:351-355.
[6] Bustamam H, Hartal H. Perbandingan pupuk organik diperkaya Streptomyces dan sekam padi untuk pertanaman daun bawang di dataran rendah Bengkulu. Paper presented at: Buku Panduan & Abstrak Plant Protection Day dan Seminar Nasional (PPDSN); 2020 Oct 26-27; Bandung, Indonesia.
[7] Taha MDM, Jaini MFM, Saidi NB, Rahim RA, Shah UKM, Hashim AM. Biocontrol of papaya dieback disease using lactic acid bacteria consortium. Plos One 2019; 14(12):1-20 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224431
[8] Salem EA, Abd El-Shafea YM. Biological control of potato soft rot caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 2018;28(94) :1-5
[9] Duffy BE, Vogelsanger J, Schoch B, Holliger E. Biocontrol of Erwinia amylovora using a commercial yeast strain mixture. Acta Horticulture. 2006;704:363-366.
[10] Istiqomah C, Javandira, Toyibah ES. Biological control of potato soft rot disease (Erwinia carotovora) using Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Paper presented at: The 1st Annual International Conference in Taiwan, AISC Taiwan; April, 27-29th, ℎ, 2013; Taiwan.
[11] Doolotkeldieva T, Bobusheva S, Suleymankisi A. Biological control of Erwinia carotovora ssp. carotovora by Streptomyces species. Advances in Microbiology. 2016;6:104-114.
[12] Sulaiman MM, Yass STA, Aish AA, Yasir LB, Abdullah SJ, Youssef SA. Activity of Trichoderma spp. against Erwinia carotovora causal agent of potato tuber soft rot. Plant Archives. 2020;20(Supplement 1):115-118.
[13] Wahyuni H, Bustamam H, Sutrawati M. Efektivitas konsosrsium pupuk hayati dan agensia hayati terhadap pertumbuhan dan pengendalian penyakit busuk lunak bawang daun. Paper presented at: Buku Abstrak Seminar Nasional Kemajuan Invensi dan Hilirisasi Inovasi Mendukung Pertanian Maju, Mandiri dan Modern; 2021 Apr 7-8. Padang, Indonesia.
[14] Al-Jeboory HHN, Al-Ani RA. Isolation and identification of Erwinia carotovora sp. atroseptica the causal agent of potato black stem and tuber rot. Al-Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2010;8(3):302-307.
[15] Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiological Research. 2008;163(2):173-181.
[16] Chaiharn M, Lumyong S. Screening and optimization of indole-3-acetic acid production and phosphate solubilization from rhizobacteria aimed at improving plant growth. Current Microbiology. 2011;62:173-181.
[17] Pikovskaya RE. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in concentration with vital activity of some microbial species. Microbiologiya. 1948;17:362-377.
[18] Patten CL, Glick RR. Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Canada Journal of Microbiology. 1996;42:207–20. https://doi.org/10.1139/m96 -032
[19] Marwanto M, Wati SP, Romeida A et al. Bio-fortified compost as a substitute for chemical N fertilizer for growth, N accumulation, and yield of sweet corn. Akta Agrosia. 2019;22(2):84-94.
[20] Marwanto M, Bustaman H, Handajaningsih M, Supanjani S, Murcitro BG. Qualitative in vitro evaluation of plant growth promoting activity of selected microbial isolates used for biofertilizer application. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Promoting Local Resources for Sustainable Agriculture and Development (ISPLRSAD 2020); Advances in Biological Sciences Research. 2020;13:299-309.
[21] Gordon SA, Weber RP. Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiology. 1951;26:192-195.
[22] Ruegger MJS, Tauk-Tornisielo SM. Cellulase activity of fungi isolated from soil of the Ecological Station of Jureia- Itatins, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 2004;27:205–211.
[23] Ten LN, Im WT, Kim MK, Kang MS, Lee T. Development of a plate technique for screening of polysaccharide-degrading microorganisms by using a mixture of insoluble chromogenic substrates. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2004;56:375–382.
[24] Beguin P, Aubert JP. The biological degradation of cellulose. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 1994;13:25– 58.
[25] Dias MP, Bastos MS, Xavie VB, Astarita EC, Santarém ER. Plant growth and resistance promoted by Streptomyces spp. in tomato. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017;118:479-493.
[26] Konappa N, Krishnamurthy S, Arakere UC, Chowdappa S, Ramachandrappa NS. Efficacy of indigenous plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and Trichoderma strains in eliciting resistance against bacterial wilt in a tomato. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 2020;30(106):1-13.
[27] Singh P, Sharma DP. Response of Trichoderma viride and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on growth and yield of chilli cv. Arka lohit. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2009;8(5):2486-2488.
[28] Ortíz-Castro R, Valencia-Cantero E, López-Bucio J. Plant growth promotion by Bacillus megaterium involves cytokinin signaling. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2008;3(4):263-265.
[29] Porcel R, Zamarreño A, García-Mina JM, Aroca R. Involvement of plant endogenous ABA in Bacillus megaterium PGPR activity in tomato plants Rosa. BMC Plant Biology. 2014;14(36):1-12.
[30] Lubna SA, Hamayun M, Gul H, In-Jung L, Hussain A. Aspergillus niger CSR3 regulates plant endogenous hormones and secondary metabolites by producing gibberellins and indoleacetic acid. Journal of Plant Interaction. 2018;13(1):100–111.
[31] Siddiqui ZA, Akhtar MS. Effects of antagonistic fungi, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alone and in combination on the reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita and growth of tomato. Journal of General Plant Pathology. 2009;75(2):144-153.
[32] Setälä H, McLean MA. Decomposition rate of organic substrates in relation to the species diversity of soil saprophytic fungi. Oecologia. 2004;139(1):98-107.
[33] Strigul NS, Kravchenko LV. Mathematical modeling of PGPR inoculation into the rhizosphere. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2006;21(8):1158-1171.