KnE Engineering
ISSN: 2518-6841
The latest conference proceedings on all fields of engineering.
The Relationship Between THE PROTAGONISTS AND THEME in the Novel ``THE TREE OF MAN'' By Patrick White As Australian Best Seller Author
Published date: Mar 07 2024
Journal Title: KnE Engineering
Issue title: Jakarta International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies towards Creative Industries (JICOMS)
Pages: 561–575
Authors:
Abstract:
It is interesting to see the relationship between Stan and Amy and their different characteristics from which arise the conflicts in facing life in order to create the intact theme. By looking at Stan’s first appearance in the novel, it seems White has a preconceived role or set of characteristics he wants to apply to Stan’s character. His bitter experience makes him become well-known as a “pretty stubborn man” by the people around him. In the meantime, Amy’s characteristics have also been prepared by White through the function of three things which were given to her by the Parson’s wife at the wedding party. Those three things are: a bible, a blouse as good as new, and a little silver nutmeg grater. Of course, they are given to Amy, but there is an impression that both Stan and Amy will have to adopt those kinds of characteristics in life. For further analysis, let us see the appearance of the protagonists as symbolized by the three things in expressing the theme.
Keywords: novel, protagonist, theme, relationship
References:
[1] Robert EV. Writing theme about literature. Prentice Hall, ]nc, U.S.; 1959, pp. 21
[2] Edgard, Op .Cit, pp.11–12.
[3] English Teacher Association of N.S., pp. 6–7. 57.
[4] English? Op .Cit, pp. 21.
[5] Dutton G. Australian writers and their work. Landsdowne Press Nelbourne; 1963. p. 36.
[6] Morley PA. The mystery of unity. University of Queensland Press; 1972. p. 103.
[7] Perrine L. Story and structure, Harcourt, Brace and World Inc. New York, 1959. p. 4.
[8] Scott V, Madden D. Studies in the short story. 5th ed. Hart Rinehart & Winston; 1954. p. 3.
[9] Kenney W. How to analyze fiction. New York: Monarch; 1966. p. 94.
[10] Laurence, Op .Cit, pp. 64
[11] Walsh W. Patrick White’s fiction. Sydney, London, Boston: George Allen & Unwin; 1977. p. 36.
[12] Alexander F. Australia since federation. Fully revised edition. A narrative and critical analysis; 1967.
[13] Brook C, et al. An approach to literature. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, mc; 1975.
[14] Dutton G. Autralian writers and their work. Patrick White, Lansdowne Press Melbourne; 1961.
[15] O’grady J. Aussie English, an explanation of the Australian Idiom, Sydney, 1965.
[16] Kenney W. How to analyze fiction monarch. New York; 1966.
[17] Kinross SG. Australia’s writers, An illustrated guide to their lives and their work, Sydney; 1972.
[18] Morley A. Patricia, the mystery of unity, theme and technique in the novel of Patrick White. University of Queenslnad Press; 1972.
[19] Perrine L. Story and structure, Harcourt, Brace and World mc, New York, 1959.
[20] Robert V. Edgard, writing theme about literature. Prentice Hall, mc, New York; 1955.
[21] Scott V, Madden D. Studies in the short story. 5th ed. New York: Hart Rinehart & Winston; 1954.
[22] Walsh W. Patrick White’s fiction. Sydney, London, Boston: George Allen & Unwin; 1977.
[23] Ward, Russel and John Robertson, Such was life, selected documents in Australia social history, N.S.W Australia, Vol. 1,11,111. 1978.
[24] White, Patrick, The tree of Man, Australia, 1955 White, Patrick, Flaws in the Glass, a self-portrait, Jonathan Cape Thirty Bedford Square London, 1981.
[25] White P, Red DJ. The Last Expatriate. Sydney; 1976.
[26] Wilkes. Melbourne: GA, Ten Essays on Patrick White, Angus and Robertson; 1970.