Published date: Oct 24 2019

Journal Title: Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research

Issue title: October–December 2019, Volume 14, Issue 4

Pages: 530–531

DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v14i4.5473

Tirth J. ShahCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa

Majid MoshirfarJohn A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; HDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA; Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT, USA

Phillip C. HoopesJohn A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; HDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA

This is a Letter to the Editor and does not have an abstract

Keywords: NA

1. Medtronic. Medical and dental procedures [cited 2018 Jun 6]. Available from: http://www.medtronic.com/us-en/ patients/electromagnetic-guide/medical-dental.html

2. L’Esperance FA Jr, Labuda EF, Johnson AM. Photocoagulation delivery systems for continuous-wave lasers. Br J Ophthalmol 1969;53:310–322.

3. Lakshmanadoss U, Chinnachamy P, Daubert PJ. Electromagnetic interference of pacemakers. In: Das MM, editor. Modern pacemakers-present and future. Norderstedt, Germany: BoD – Books on Demand.-1591682083- 1591682083.

4. Sher AN, Golben MP, Kresge K, Selznick L, Adabag S. An in vitro evaluation of electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and ophthalmic laser systems. Europace 2011;13:583–588.

5. Audoubert M, Ostiguy G, Nguyen D, Plante M, Dubuc M, Guerra P, et al. Resistance of the medtronic Micra leadless pacemaker to 60 Hz electric fields. Can J Cardiol 2017;33:S155.